The Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) was reorganised into seven wholly government-owned Defence Public Sector Undertakings (DPSUs), which began business on 1 October 2021. The change transferred production units into companies grouped by manufacturing area; it was a corporatisation, not a privatisation. The government said the new structure was intended to increase autonomy, accountability and efficiency, but those aims are not proof that performance improved.
What did the splitting of OFB mean?
The Cabinet Committee on Security approved converting OFB production units into seven DPSUs on 16 June 2021. The companies commenced business on 1 October 2021. The Ministry of Defence described the reorganisation as covering 41 units. Rather than retain the production network under one board, the government allocated factories and related functions to separate corporate entities, while assigning some central functions to a Directorate of Ordnance. The Ministry’s transfer statement lists the receiving companies for production and specified non-production units, including training institutes, safety and marketing units.
The companies were described as 100 percent government-owned. The change therefore altered the organisation of state-owned defence production; it did not, by itself, sell the factories or companies to private owners. In a July 2021 parliamentary reply, the Ministry said there was then “no proposal of privatization” of DPSUs under the Department of Defence Production. That statement records the government’s position at that time, not a guarantee about future or current policy. Read the July 2021 reply.
What are the seven new defence companies?
The Ministry’s 2021 mapping groups the inherited factory footprint by business area. The listed allocations add up to 41 factories.
#1 Best Overall
| Successor company | Stated business area | Factories in Ministry’s 2021 list |
|---|---|---|
| Munitions India Limited (MIL) | Ammunition and explosives | 12 |
| Armoured Vehicles Nigam Limited (AVANI) | Vehicles | 5 |
| Advanced Weapons and Equipment India Limited (AWE India) | Weapons and equipment | 8 |
| Troop Comforts Limited (TCL) | Troop comfort items | 4 |
| Yantra India Limited (YIL) | Military-grade components and ancillary products | 8 |
| India Optel Limited (IOL) | Opto-electronics | 3 |
| Gliders India Limited (GIL) | Parachutes | 1 |
The Ministry’s 2021 list includes the individual factory names and headquarters. A 2023 Ministry reply uses “Advanced Weapons and Equipment India Limited (AWEIL)” instead of “AWE India”; the naming varies by source, so the forms should not be silently treated as identical wording. See the 2023 reply. The company allocation and business descriptions above follow the Ministry’s 2021 mapping. See the mapping and transfer list.
Why did the government corporatise OFB?
The Ministry presented corporatisation as a way to give the successor entities greater functional and financial autonomy and accountability, with the aims of improving efficiency, competitiveness, innovation and self-reliance in defence preparedness. These were policy objectives, not findings that the outcomes had already been achieved. The Ministry’s June 2021 announcement describes the approval and rationale.
Rank #2
At the October 2021 dedication event, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said: “The objective of this restructuring is to transform Ordnance Factories into productive, and profitable assets; improve expertise in product range; increase competitiveness; improve quality; enhance cost-efficiency and ensure self-reliance in defence preparedness.” The statement explains the intended direction of the reform; it is not an evaluation of later results. The event release records his remarks.
What happened to employees and central functions?
A November 2021 Ministry statement said Group A, B and C employees in production units and identified non-production units were transferred en masse on deemed deputation, initially for two years from the appointed date of 1 October 2021. During that arrangement, central-government service rules and conditions—including pay, allowances, leave, medical facilities and career progression—were to continue. The statement separately assigned OFB headquarters, the New Delhi office, schools and hospitals to the Directorate of Ordnance (Coordination & Services), also initially for two years. These describe the announced initial arrangements; the cited release does not establish current employment terms. Read the November 2021 statement.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
How large was the transition?
Official figures describe different measures at different dates, so they should not be combined into a single current snapshot.
- 41 units: the Ministry’s December 2021 reply says 41 production units were converted into seven DPSUs, effective 1 October 2021. Source: December 2021 reply.
- More than 75,000 employees: the October 2021 event release described the reform as involving this number of employees. Source: October 2021 release.
- More than ₹79,000 crore in assets: the October 2021 event release gave this asset figure. A later Ministry reply in July 2022 reported transfer of assets valued at over ₹90,000 crore. These are separately dated government figures and should not be collapsed into one undated estimate. October 2021 figure; July 2022 figure.
- More than ₹65,000 crore in order book: this was the figure used in the Prime Minister’s October 2021 event remarks, not a current order-book measure. Source: October 2021 event release.
Does the change show that defence production improved?
The decision, ownership structure, factory allocation and stated policy goals are documented. They do not, on their own, establish that the companies later became more efficient, profitable, competitive or successful at replacing imports. Demonstrating those outcomes would require comparable company-level financial and operating results against a defined pre-reorganisation baseline, with changes in orders, accounting and market conditions taken into account.
Rank #4
- Soldiers
- WW II
- Rescue
- Mission
- Phillipines
For context, the Ministry reported defence exports of ₹9,115.55 crore in 2019–20, ₹8,434.84 crore in 2020–21 and ₹12,814.54 crore in 2021–22. Those totals include exports by both DPSUs and private defence companies, so they cannot be attributed to the seven successor companies alone. The Ministry also reported ₹1,191.01 crore for 2022–23 through the first quarter, based on authorisations issued to private firms; that partial figure is not directly comparable to full-year totals. Source: Ministry of Defence reply, July 2022.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
