Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Drake did not win the federal lawsuit over Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us.” On October 9, 2025, U.S. District Judge Jeannette A. Vargas dismissed Drake’s claims against Universal Music Group (UMG), ruling that the lyrics, considered in the context of a heated rap battle, were nonactionable opinion—not statements a reasonable listener would understand as verifiable facts.
What did the judge rule in Drake’s lawsuit?
Judge Vargas granted UMG’s motion to dismiss Drake’s case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Drake, whose legal name is Aubrey Drake Graham, had sued UMG over the label’s publication and promotion of Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us.” The defendant in this federal case was UMG, not Lamar.
The complaint asserted defamation, harassment in the second degree, and a claim under New York General Business Law § 349. The dismissal was a district-court ruling on those claims; it was not a jury verdict.
Why did the court dismiss the claims?
The court assessed how an ordinary reasonable listener would understand the recording as a whole and in context. It treated the song as part of a heated rap battle marked by insults, hyperbole, and offensive accusations from both participants—not as a literal factual report separated from the exchange around it.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →#1 Best Overall
Vargas wrote in the October 9, 2025 opinion: “Although the accusation that Plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that ‘Not Like Us’ imparts verifiable facts about Plaintiff.”
That was the court’s legal conclusion about whether the challenged lyrics could support the claims. It was not a finding after trial that the accusation was true or false.
Rank #2
- INTERACTIVE FEATURES: Lifelike baby doll that simulates breathing, cooing, and heartbeat sounds for an incredibly realistic nurturing experience
- AUTHENTIC DESIGN: Created by Master Artist Linda Murray with RealTouch vinyl soft skin, hand-rooted hair, and fully poseable cloth body
- REALISTIC DETAILS: 19-inch doll is weighted to feel like a real baby and includes a gentle baby powder scent for added authenticity
- ADORABLE OUTFIT: Dressed in a pink ruffled floral sleeper with rosebud buttons and matching flowered hair bow
- BATTERY OPERATION: Requires 3 AA batteries (not included) to activate interactive breathing and sound features
Did Drake appeal?
Associated Press reported on October 9, 2025, that Drake’s legal team said it intended to appeal. That report establishes an stated intention, not whether an appeal was subsequently filed or how it was resolved.
The Second Circuit says appeals filed since 2010 are maintained in its CM/ECF system linked to PACER, and it provides a separate decisions search. Those access pages do not establish the status or outcome of this particular case. No later appellate ruling is confirmed here, so the district-court dismissal should not be described as a final appellate outcome.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
- INTERACTIVE FEATURES: Touch-activated baby doll responds to gentle touches or butterfly kisses on her cheek with realistic cooing sounds, creating an engaging interactive experience
- LIFELIKE DESIGN: Handcrafted with baby-soft RealTouch vinyl skin, hand-painted features, hand-rooted curls, and realistic fingernails and toenails for amazing realism
- ARTIST CRAFTED: Created by award-winning Master Doll Artist Waltraud Hanl, featuring fully poseable limbs and an expressive face that perfectly captures the artist's original sculpture
- COMFORT FEATURES: Soft cloth body specially designed for comfortable holding and cuddling, with a delightful baby powder scent for added realism
- CHARMING OUTFIT: Comes dressed in an exclusive one-piece outfit featuring pretty butterfly patterns and a matching red bow, measures approximately 19 inches in length
Sources and case scope
- Judge Vargas’s October 9, 2025 opinion and order, the primary source for the claims, reasoning, and dismissal.
- Associated Press coverage from October 9, 2025, reporting the dismissal and Drake’s stated intention to appeal.
- Second Circuit Dockets and the court’s Decisions search explain public appellate-record access; they are not a case-specific status update.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
