Hardware FixRecommendedDevice not working? Your driver may be the problemCheck updates for common hardware issues.Fix DriversOctober DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsPC HealthRecommendedCrashes, freezes, slowdowns? Check your PC nowSpot repairable issues before they interrupt work.Check PC×
Skip to content
The Finance Base
The Money Desk · Blog
Re:

Post Office inquiry: Is Paula Vennells lying? What the evidence shows

The evidence raises serious questions about what Paula Vennells knew about Horizon. Here is what her inquiry evidence and Alice Perkins’s testimony do—and do not—establish about whether she knowingly lied.
From TheFinanceBase Team3 min to read
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

The evidence raises serious questions about what former Post Office chief executive Paula Vennells knew about Horizon and how she described it. But the material available here does not establish as a settled finding that she knowingly lied. A statement being wrong is not, by itself, proof that its speaker knew it was wrong or intended to mislead.

What Vennells said under inquiry questioning

Her answer about an earlier Post Office response

Vennells gave evidence to the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry on 24 May 2024. While being questioned about an earlier Post Office response to a television programme, she said: “I don’t think I say anything there that we didn’t say in our statement to the programme.”

That was Vennells’s answer about whether her response matched the Post Office’s statement at the time. It does not, on its own, establish whether the statement was accurate, what she personally knew when it was made, or whether she intended to mislead anyone.

What an incorrect statement does—and does not—show

In an earlier inquiry transcript, Vennells described statements as incorrect because people had answered based on what they understood at the time. This acknowledges that statements were wrong, but leaves a separate question: what did Vennells know, or have reason to know, when each statement was made?

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

To call a particular statement a lie is to claim more than inaccuracy. It means asserting that the speaker knew it was false or intended to mislead. Establishing that requires evidence about the specific words, when and to whom they were said, and the information available to the speaker then.

What Alice Perkins said about Vennells’s knowledge

On 19 July 2024, former Post Office chair Alice Perkins was asked what she thought Vennells knew. Perkins said that, on the basis of evidence emerging in the inquiry, she thought Vennells knew there were faults in Horizon.

That is Perkins’s opinion as a witness. It is relevant to the question of Vennells’s knowledge, but it is not itself a formal finding by the inquiry chair or proof that Vennells knowingly made a false statement.

What the inquiry has formally reported so far

As of 4 October 2026, the inquiry website reports that Volume 1 of its final report has been published. That volume focuses on human impact and redress. The remaining volumes are still being prepared; the inquiry says their size and complexity have affected the timetable.

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

So far, that publication status does not amount to a final resolution of every question about individual knowledge or intent. Witness evidence, including a witness’s view about what someone knew, should not be presented as a formal finding unless the inquiry has made that finding.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

How to judge a claim that she lied

Assess any specific allegation against the contemporaneous record, rather than treating every inaccurate statement as proof of deliberate deception. The relevant checks are:

  • The exact words and date: Identify the statement being challenged and when it was made.
  • The audience and context: Establish who received it and what question or issue it addressed.
  • What was known at the time: Examine which documents, warnings or other information were available to Vennells by that date.
  • What she later said: Compare her inquiry evidence with the earlier statement, without treating her explanation as independently verified merely because she gave it under questioning.
  • Corroboration and findings: Weigh other witness testimony and records, and distinguish evidence or opinion from a formal inquiry conclusion.

Without that statement-by-statement comparison, a broad yes-or-no verdict would claim more than the cited evidence establishes.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More post from the Money Desk

  1. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 267 minMortgage Escrow FAQs: Taxes, Insurance, Shortages, and Refunds
  2. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow Mortgage Escrow Accounts Work and What Homeowners Pay For
  3. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow to Read a Stock Chart, Volume and Market-Cap Data
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You DownFree scan - exact matches
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?Free scan - under a minute

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.