In March 2000, ACT Manufacturing announced a plan to buy Thailand-based GSS Array Technology for $93 million in cash, giving ACT an Asian manufacturing operation as customers pressed it to build a regional presence. The deal was expected to close in August, according to the announcement coverage; that report does not establish whether it ultimately closed.
Why ACT wanted an operation in Asia
ACT’s stated rationale was customer demand. Chief executive John A. Pino said customers were asking the company to establish an Asian presence, and he described the acquisition as a move to compete among global contract electronics manufacturers: “You have to be large in this marketplace,” Pino said. “It’s a tier-one move for us.”
Buying an established Thailand operation offered a faster route to regional capacity than building a presence from scratch. The March 17, 2000 EE Times report by Claire Serant described GSS Array’s operation as having 22 surface-mount printed-circuit-board lines and 2,800 employees. It also said the acquisition would bring ACT 20 customers.
What the deal was expected to add
ACT announced a $93 million cash purchase. Pino said the acquisition could add $250 million to ACT’s revenue through RF amplifiers, telephone equipment, and power systems. That figure was a management expectation reported at the time, not a confirmed result.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →#1 Best Overall
The report said telecommunications accounted for about 50% of GSS Array’s business and computers for 15%. Those figures describe the business mix reported in 2000; they do not establish how the acquired operation later performed.
How the move fit the Asian competition
The report placed ACT’s planned expansion in a region where other contract electronics manufacturers were also building or using Asian capacity. It named Celestica and NatSteel Electronics as companies with Thailand facilities, and described Asian expansion by Flextronics, Jabil Circuit, and SCI Systems. The article did not provide comparable facility-level or financial figures for those peers, so it supports a comparison of strategic direction—not a quantitative ranking.
Analyst Jerry Labowitz of Merrill Lynch estimated that Asia’s contract-electronics market generated $5 billion in revenue in 1999 and forecast annual growth of 25% through 2003. That was a historical estimate and forecast, not a current market measure. SG Cowen Securities Corp. analyst Amy Lubas argued that ACT still had room to enter the region: “It’s not too late for them to be in Asia,” she said. She added, “Jabil was top-tier for many years and didn’t have an Asia operation.”
ACT’s financial position at the time
The same report put ACT’s 1999 revenue at $696.3 million, up from $592.5 million in 1998. Net income before extraordinary costs was $11.8 million in 1999, compared with $3.1 million the prior year. These are historical figures cited in the March 2000 coverage, not present-day financial information.
Rank #3
What the announcement does—and does not—show
The announcement established ACT’s planned purchase, the expected August closing, the operating capacity and customers attributed to GSS Array, and management’s hoped-for revenue contribution. It does not, by itself, establish that the transaction closed, what happened to the operation afterward, or whether the forecast contribution was realized.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
