Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute“The Last Plantation” was a criticism, not an official USDA name. Black farmers and employees used the phrase to describe alleged and documented unequal treatment in federal agricultural programs and the agency’s handling of civil-rights complaints. The history centers on farm-loan access, delays, local administration, and the landmark Pigford v. Glickman case.
What “The Last Plantation” meant
The phrase conveyed a sharp accusation: that Black farmers faced discriminatory treatment by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), including barriers to loans and other farm benefits, while Black employees also faced discrimination inside the department. A 1997 Government Executive article reported the phrase as a criticism used by Black farmers and employees; it was not an official USDA designation. Jerry Hagstrom’s 1997 account covered the controversy and then-Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman’s stated focus on civil rights.
The phrase later appeared in government records. A 2021 Senate record linked it to historical disparities in farm-loan processing and described the nickname as arising from discrimination. That wording is the Senate record’s characterization—not a USDA self-description. The Congressional Record reports average processing times of 30 days for White farmers and 387 days for Black farmers in the 1980s and 1990s. Those figures describe that historical period, not current USDA processing times.
How unequal treatment affected farm programs
Federal farm programs can shape whether producers obtain credit, keep operating, and maintain land. The historical accounts describe complaints about delayed or denied farm loans, unequal access to program benefits, and how civil-rights complaints were handled. Local administration also mattered: federal programs were often delivered through local agricultural offices and boards, where decisions could determine whether an applicant received timely assistance.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
- non-fiction african american book set
- non-fiction black book set
- non-fiction african american children's book set
- non-fiction black children's book set
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights’ historical account documents discriminatory treatment and inferior or denied services in federally financed agricultural programs. Its account concerns historical evidence; it should not be read as a statement about current USDA procedures. The Commission’s Chapter 1 provides background on the discrimination documented in the Mississippi Delta.
What Pigford v. Glickman addressed
Pigford v. Glickman was a class action brought by Black farmers against USDA. The claims concerned discrimination in farm-loan and other benefit programs, as well as the department’s handling of race-discrimination complaints. The case and its settlement became a central part of the public record on the issue.
It is important to distinguish a settlement from a finding that every individual allegation was proven. Nor does the settlement, by itself, establish that every affected farmer received relief or that later concerns about discrimination and program access were resolved. A 2021 House hearing record recounts the lawsuit, settlement, and concerns raised by witnesses afterward; testimony and claims in a hearing should be attributed as such, rather than presented as court findings. The hearing record also discusses the broader state of Black farmers in the United States.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the history says—and what it does not
Government reports, congressional records, testimony, and journalism offer different kinds of evidence. A commission’s historical account documents its findings; a congressional record may report historical figures or characterize events; testimony records a witness’s account; and a news article reports and contextualizes developments. Keeping those categories separate helps avoid treating an allegation, a statistic, a settlement, and a formal finding as interchangeable.
Historical accounts connect unequal access to federal programs with land loss and a decline in Black farm operators. The House hearing discusses that relationship, but figures and estimates should be tied to the witness or source and census period they refer to. Black farm-operator statistics from one period are not current counts, and figures from different census years should not be combined as if they measure the same population under the same conditions.
The record explains why the phrase has enduring force: it became shorthand for a history of discriminatory treatment and failures in complaint handling. It does not establish the present-day rules, processing times, or status of USDA programs. Those can change, so historical claims should not be used as a guide to current application requirements.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- Hardcover coffee table book celebrating America's 250th Anniversary from 1776 to 2026 with a curated visual timeline of defining milestones and pivotal moments
- Crafted with a durable, museum-quality hardcover binding designed for long-lasting display. A timeless keepsake made to be shared, gifted, and preserved.
- Printed on premium semi-gloss archival paper to preserve vivid color, crisp detail, and long-term clarity. Each spread reads like a visual narrative through American history.
- Refined matte finish provides a sophisticated, glare-free presentation reminiscent of gallery and museum publications — perfect for coffee tables and offices.
- Ideal for veterans, collectors, educators, patriotic households, and anyone looking for a commemorative 250th Anniversary gift leading up to 2026.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
