Kroger (NYSE: KR) and Albertsons Companies (NYSE: ACI) sell groceries and pharmacy products directly to shoppers; United Natural Foods (NYSE: UNFI) is a distributor whose exposure would be indirect, through retailers’ orders. All three could be connected to spending by Social Security beneficiaries, but none is established as a “COLA winner”: the available evidence does not quantify beneficiaries’ purchases or show that an annual benefit adjustment lifts these companies’ sales, earnings, or share prices.
As of October 11, 2026, the Social Security Administration had not announced the 2027 cost-of-living adjustment (COLA). A 3.5% to 3.6% figure cited for 2027 is an estimate, not an official adjustment. The latest published COLA was 2.8%, effective for benefits payable in January 2026.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
What is known about Social Security’s 2027 COLA?
The 2027 adjustment was still pending as of October 11, 2026. The SSA’s COLA summary said the next adjustment would be announced in October 2026, while its latest adjustment page listed a 2.8% COLA for benefits payable in January 2026.
Simply Wall St’s October 11, 2026 article estimated a 3.5% to 3.6% adjustment for 2027. That range is a forecast, not an SSA determination, and the cited material does not provide a separate forecast to validate it. Check the SSA announcement before relying on any projected percentage.
#1 Best Overall
How the SSA calculates a COLA
The SSA ties the adjustment to the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). It compares the average CPI-W for the third quarter of the current year with the third-quarter average from the last year a COLA took effect. If the index has increased, the adjustment reflects that increase. The calculation concerns benefit purchasing-power adjustments; it does not predict how recipients will spend the added income or how any company will perform.
How a benefit increase could connect to these stocks
The proposed link is straightforward but unproven: beneficiaries may spend part of their benefits on recurring essentials, including food, prescriptions, and household goods. More cash in a household budget does not necessarily mean more spending at a particular chain. Housing, food, healthcare, and other expenses compete for that money, and the Simply Wall St article raised Medicare premiums as a possible offset. The cited evidence does not establish a finalized 2027 Part B premium or quantify how much of a COLA retirees might retain after premiums.
The distinction between direct and indirect exposure matters. Supermarkets and pharmacies serve shoppers themselves; a distributor depends on purchases and orders made by retail businesses. The source material does not quantify Social Security recipients’ spending at any of the three companies, isolate COLA-related sales, or establish an earnings effect.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Three stocks associated with the essentials-spending thesis
| Company | How it fits the thesis | Exposure | What is not established |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kroger (NYSE: KR) | U.S. supermarket and pharmacy retailer selling groceries, prescriptions, and household goods. | Direct: beneficiaries can shop at its stores for everyday essentials. | No quantified share of sales from Social Security recipients or measured effect from a COLA. |
| Albertsons Companies (NYSE: ACI) | Supermarket and pharmacy chains selling groceries, prescriptions, and everyday essentials. | Direct: the proposed connection is grocery and pharmacy traffic from shoppers. | No quantified beneficiary spending or demonstrated causal link between a COLA and company results. |
| United Natural Foods (NYSE: UNFI) | Distributor of natural, organic, and conventional groceries and wellness products to supermarkets and other retail chains. | Indirect: stronger retailer demand could, in theory, feed through to wholesale orders. | No evidence that senior spending or a COLA changes its sales volumes or earnings. |
The company descriptions and the stock thesis come from Simply Wall St’s October 11, 2026 article. The direct-versus-indirect distinction follows from those business descriptions; it is not a measured ranking of COLA sensitivity.
Rank #3
What investors should—and should not—infer
Retailers have a more direct path, not a guaranteed benefit
Kroger and Albertsons have a direct consumer-facing route: beneficiaries could use their stores for food, prescriptions, and other essentials. That makes the connection easier to describe than UNFI’s, but it does not show that the companies would capture incremental spending. A COLA is not necessarily discretionary income, and the evidence does not isolate the spending decisions of Social Security recipients.
UNFI’s connection depends on retailers
UNFI sits upstream. Any potential benefit would depend on retail customers’ demand and wholesale orders, rather than a direct transaction with a beneficiary. That is a supply-chain inference, not evidence that a COLA would increase UNFI’s volumes.
A COLA thesis is not a company forecast
The cited article raises questions about retailer margins and wholesale economics, but the evidence available here does not independently verify company-specific operating risks or quantify their impact. A plausible demand story alone cannot establish revenue growth, margin improvement, earnings sensitivity, or a share-price response.
Quick Recap
How to assess the claim before investing
- Separate official figures from forecasts. Use the SSA’s announced adjustment rather than treating an estimate as final.
- Account for household costs. The proposed spending channel can be weakened when benefit increases are absorbed by essentials or premiums; no cited figure establishes the net amount available to spend.
- Distinguish the business models. KR and ACI sell directly to shoppers; UNFI’s possible exposure depends on retail demand and wholesale orders.
- Look for company-specific evidence. The cited material does not show beneficiary sales, COLA-linked revenue, or earnings sensitivity for any of these stocks.
- Do not treat the connection as a stock recommendation. The thesis describes a possible demand channel, not a demonstrated catalyst or assurance of investment returns.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
