Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsThe 11-project list is a snapshot of partnership claims published by Michael Draper on HackerNoon on December 18, 2018—not a current ranking or proof that every relationship is still active. It mixes consortium membership, announced collaboration, customer relationships, and reported deployments, so “partner” does not mean the same thing in every entry.
Below, the original examples are kept in their historical context, with newer primary-source details included where available. The evidence does not establish the current status of every relationship.
How to read this 2018 roundup
Draper’s article used “partnerships and collaborations” broadly. A company listed in a consortium is not necessarily a customer; an announcement may describe a pilot or planned work rather than a live service; and a vendor case study is not independent verification. The original list is useful as a record of high-profile blockchain activity discussed at the time, but it should not be read as a present-day endorsement or directory.
The figures below are claims in the 2018 HackerNoon article unless explicitly labeled otherwise. The current EEA directory and later company materials offer context for selected examples, but they do not refresh all 11 entries.
#1 Best Overall
The 11 projects and relationships cited
1. Hyperledger: an enterprise open-source project
The 2018 article described Hyperledger as a collaborative open-source enterprise project and named corporate participants. It cited more than 250 members at the time. That historical membership figure is not a current count, and membership should not be mistaken for a commercial partnership with every participant. Source: Michael Draper, HackerNoon, December 18, 2018.
2. Ethereum and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance: consortium membership
The article presented the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (EEA) as a consortium connecting companies and Ethereum developers, and reported more than 300 members in 2018. The EEA’s current member directory describes a neutral, member-led organization and lists 38 organizations. Its page says members participate in working groups, research, events, and institutional programs. That current directory is a separate snapshot; it does not verify the old count or show that 2018 members remain members. EEA member directory.
3. Stellar: collaborations and Stripe
Draper’s article said Stellar had more than 48 collaborations and highlighted Stripe, reporting that Stripe supported more than 100,000 businesses. Those are figures attributed to the 2018 article, not current measures of Stellar’s partner network or Stripe’s present role. The article’s description alone does not establish that every named relationship was a formal commercial agreement. Source: HackerNoon, 2018.
4. Ripple: banks and payment businesses
The roundup named banks and payment or remittance businesses, including Western Union, in connection with Ripple. It does not establish the current status, scope, or commercial terms of those relationships. Treat them as examples reported in 2018 rather than as a list of active Ripple customers. Source: HackerNoon, 2018.
5. Aergo: enterprise positioning and Blocko
The 2018 article associated Aergo with enterprise use and Blocko. Aergo’s current site describes AERGO as an open-source hybrid blockchain smart-contract platform for decentralized applications and reports 50+ enterprise clients and 43 current use cases. Those are company-reported figures; the site does not independently verify the specific Blocko-related claims in Draper’s article. Aergo.
6. VeChain: supply-chain focus
Draper characterized VeChain as focused on supply chains and named companies including BMW and PICC. The article cited 24 partner companies. That is a historical claim from 2018, not a verified current partner count, and the roundup does not establish that each company had the same kind or depth of relationship. Source: HackerNoon, 2018.
Rank #3
7. ICON: interoperability initiative and LINE
The article referenced the Blockchain Interoperability Alliance announced by ICON, Wanchain, and Aion, and also described a relationship with LINE. Its claim that LINE had more than 200 million users was a 2018 article figure. Neither that figure nor the article establishes that the alliance or LINE arrangement remains active today. Source: HackerNoon, 2018.
8. Qtum: an AWS-related offering
Draper described an Amazon Web Services-related offering involving an Amazon Machine Image and smart-contract development. The available sources do not establish whether that offering remains available or what its current terms are. The example should therefore be understood as a description in the 2018 article, not a present-day AWS availability claim. Source: HackerNoon, 2018.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →9. OmiseGo: distinguish it from Omise
The article discussed OmiseGo as a payment platform while explicitly distinguishing it from Omise. That distinction matters: merchant relationships associated with the parent company Omise should not automatically be described as direct OmiseGo partnerships. The 2018 roundup does not establish the current status of the cited relationships. Source: HackerNoon, 2018.
Rank #4
10. Brave: Dow Jones Media Group and a publishing experiment
Brave’s April 18, 2018 announcement said Dow Jones Media Group would offer premium content to a limited number of Brave users and test blockchain technology in digital publishing. Barron’s and MarketWatch were to become verified publishers on BAT. This describes a limited offer and an experiment, not evidence that the arrangement continues today. Brave’s announcement, April 18, 2018.
Brave’s January 2019 recap also listed Dow Jones Media Group among its 2018 partnerships. In that recap, Brave reported 5.5 million monthly active users and more than 28,000 verified publishers at the end of 2018; those are company-reported figures from that period, not current user or publisher counts. Brave’s 2018 year-in-review, published January 2019.
11. Powerledger: BCPG and peer-to-peer energy trading
On December 18, 2018, Powerledger announced an agreement with BCPG for peer-to-peer renewable-energy trading in Bangkok. BCPG President Bundit Sapianchai said at the time: “Innovation is at the heart of BCPG. And we are excited to be working with Power Ledger.” The quotation reflects his contemporaneous statement in the announcement, not a current assessment. Powerledger announcement, December 18, 2018.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
A later Powerledger case study says BCPG and Thailand’s Metropolitan Electricity Authority use its software to trade rooftop solar energy across buildings and describes expansion of the T77 project. Powerledger’s current offerings page also lists the Thailand BCPG project. These are vendor-published descriptions, useful for understanding the reported project but not independent audits of its operation or results. Powerledger’s T77/O77 case study; Powerledger offerings.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the evidence does—and does not—show
The examples range from membership directories and announced experiments to company-described operating projects. They should not be combined into a single count of active commercial partnerships. In particular, the 2018 roundup’s counts for Hyperledger, the EEA, Stellar, VeChain, and LINE are historical claims, while later details for Brave and Powerledger have their own dates and source limitations.
For anyone assessing a blockchain relationship now, check the project and counterpart’s current statements for the relationship’s scope, date, geography, and status. Look for whether the evidence describes membership, a pilot, a customer, or a production deployment. The sources cited here do not verify current status across all 11 projects.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
