October DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsClean PCRecommendedOne scan can reveal what keeps slowing WindowsLook for cleanup and repair opportunities.Run ScanOctober DealsAmazon USDeal season is back - check today's better picksAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.See Picks×
Skip to content
The Finance Base
The Money Desk · Blog
Re:

Why Industrial Companies Are Struggling to Scale Emerging Technology

EY’s November 2024 survey suggests enterprise interest in emerging technology is outpacing active deployment, with respondents reporting challenges around integration, security, skills and suppliers.
From TheFinanceBase Team4 min to read
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

EY’s 2025 study points to a gap between enterprise investment in emerging technologies and the ability to put them into active use. The findings cover multiple industries—not manufacturing alone—and suggest that scaling and integration, alongside security, data governance, skills and supplier coordination, remain reported challenges.

What EY’s study measured—and what it did not

EY’s Reimagining Industry Futures Study 2025 was based on an online survey of 1,635 enterprise respondents fielded in November 2024. Respondents had to describe themselves as at least moderately knowledgeable about their organization’s emerging-technology initiatives. The survey covered multiple industries and geographies, including sustainability, enterprise spending and adoption, AI and 5G-IoT use cases, supplier capabilities and supplier ecosystems. Manufacturing accounted for 12% of respondents.

That makes the findings a cross-industry snapshot with industrial representation, not a census or audit of industrial companies worldwide. They reflect respondents’ reports at the time of the survey and cannot establish why a particular company’s project stalled or prove that any one obstacle caused slow deployment. The detailed figures below were reported by Computer Weekly from EY’s study; they are survey responses, not independently audited deployment data. Computer Weekly’s February 18, 2025 coverage and EY’s official study page provide the source context.

Investment figures exceed active deployment figures

EY’s survey, as reported by Computer Weekly, shows why investment should not be read as proof that a technology is in routine production use. The figures describe different adoption stages: whether respondents reported investing in a technology, and whether they reported active deployments.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Technology Reported investment Reported active deployment
Generative AI 47% in EY’s November 2024 survey, versus 43% in the prior survey year 1% in EY’s November 2024 survey
Internet of Things (IoT) 43% in EY’s November 2024 survey 16% in EY’s November 2024 survey, compared with 19% in the 2024 survey
5G 33% in EY’s November 2024 survey Not stated in the cited Computer Weekly coverage
Edge computing Not stated in the cited Computer Weekly coverage 22% in EY’s November 2024 survey, flat year-on-year

Investment can include spending or intent to invest; an active deployment is a later stage. Neither figure alone says whether a technology is used broadly across operations, integrated with other systems, or delivering a particular business outcome. The especially large gap between reported GenAI investment and active deployment is consistent with interest outpacing implementation, but the survey does not establish the status of individual projects.

Why moving from trial to production is difficult

Scaling and integration

EY’s coverage describes difficulty scaling use cases and integrating new systems into existing environments. A successful trial may work in a limited setting without being ready for production across sites, teams or workflows. Connecting new tools to established systems can also demand coordination beyond the technology team.

Security and data governance for GenAI

Among respondents discussing GenAI impediments, 50% cited cybersecurity and data protection as a leading concern, while 46% cited improving data governance. These reported concerns point to questions companies need to resolve before broader use—such as how data is protected and governed—but do not prove that security or governance was the cause of any particular deployment delay.

Skills and organizational change

Adoption also depends on employees being able to use new systems and on teams across business functions working together. EY’s discussion emphasizes upskilling and collaboration, as well as leadership involvement. A technical pilot can therefore remain isolated if the organization has not made the operational changes needed to use it at scale.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Supplier coordination

Emerging technology projects may involve multiple vendors and partners. In EY’s survey, as reported by Computer Weekly, 73% said they needed a better understanding of the changing supplier landscape, and 56% reported limited awareness of their technology suppliers’ partners. Those responses suggest that navigating the ecosystem is itself a challenge for some enterprises.

Why combining technologies matters

Companies may miss value when technologies remain isolated experiments rather than working together in operations. Rob Atkinson, EY area managing partner for UK and Ireland TMT, told Computer Weekly: “As well as posing a challenge to unlocking long-term value, a failure to progress beyond the trial phase means businesses risk missing out on the combined impact of different technologies deployed together, an area where four in five (79%) organisations are looking to achieve more.” The 79% figure is attributed to the article’s account of the study, not to a manufacturing-only result.

For example, IoT data, connectivity and analytics may need to fit into existing workflows and systems before they can support an operational use case. The study’s findings do not prescribe specific equipment or establish that a particular combination will succeed; they underline the distinction between testing a component and embedding connected technologies in business processes.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What the findings mean for industrial companies

The survey does not diagnose any one firm, but its reported barriers suggest practical questions for organizations trying to move beyond pilots:

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
  • Define the deployment stage. Separate budget or investment plans from pilots, active deployments and scaled operational use.
  • Plan integration early. Identify how a new system will connect to existing infrastructure and workflows, and which teams own those connections.
  • Set governance and security requirements. For GenAI, clarify data protection and governance expectations before expanding use.
  • Prepare people and processes. Include employee training, cross-functional collaboration and leadership in rollout planning.
  • Map the supplier ecosystem. Know which vendors and partners contribute capabilities, and how responsibilities fit together.
  • Evaluate combined use cases. Consider whether technologies need to work together to deliver the intended operational value, rather than treating each pilot as an isolated endpoint.

An industrial IoT gateway is one possible connectivity component in an IoT or edge architecture, but EY’s study neither evaluates gateways nor recommends particular hardware. The survey is evidence about reported enterprise adoption and challenges, not equipment-buying guidance.

How to read the headline carefully

“Stunted” describes the reported difficulty of progressing emerging technologies into deployment; it should not be read as a measured verdict on every industrial firm. The study’s respondents came from varied sectors and geographies, only 12% were in manufacturing, and fieldwork took place in November 2024. Its results are useful for understanding the reported gap between investment and deployment at that point in time, not as a measure of adoption in 2026 or a forecast of what every company will do.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More post from the Money Desk

  1. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase07 MAR 2625 minWhat Is a 457 Plan?
  2. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase07 MAR 2621 minTime Value of Money: What It Is and How It Works
  3. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase07 MAR 2627 minAre You Living in One of These Top 10 Most Expensive Cities to Retire?
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They SpreadFree repair scan
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?Free driver scan

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.