Tesla attorney Tyree P. Jones Jr. argued that context matters when assessing use of the N-word, distinguishing friendly use among Black people from a white person directing the slur at a Black person. That argument is part of an ongoing California civil-rights case over alleged workplace discrimination; it is not a court finding that any conduct was lawful or unlawful.
What is the California case about?
California Civil Rights Department v. Tesla Inc., Alameda County Superior Court No. 22CV006830, is a state civil-rights case brought by California’s Civil Rights Department (CRD). The department says it sued in 2022 after about three years of investigation. The bench trial opened September 21, 2026, before Judge Peter Borkon, according to Bloomberg Law. As of October 3, 2026, the proceeding was underway, with no reported finding on liability.
CRD alleges that Black employees faced racial harassment, discriminatory job assignments and pay, and retaliation. The department says its allegations include racial slurs used in the workplace, including in the presence of or by supervisors and managers, and that workers used “plantation” to refer to Tesla’s Fremont factory. Those are the agency’s allegations, not findings established by the court.
What did Tesla’s lawyer say about the slur?
Bloomberg Law reported that Jones argued the state’s presentation of the N-word lacked context. He distinguished a white person directing the slur at a Black person from Black people using it with one another in a friendly way. Complex quoted Jones telling the judge: “This trial is not about the N-word — the N-word is not on trial here.”
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
Bloomberg Law also quoted Jones saying, “By this action, the state of California attacks the way that many Black people greet each other, express respect for each other, and express endearment and love for each other.” These statements describe Tesla’s lawyer’s argument, not a ruling by Judge Borkon.
Did Tesla argue that non-Black coworkers could use the slur against Black workers?
The reported argument does not support that interpretation. The Crosscheck’s September 30, 2026 fact-check describes Jones’s distinction as one between friendly use among Black people and a white person directing the slur at a Black person. It does not report him asserting a general right for non-Black coworkers or managers to direct the slur at Black employees. The Crosscheck also said published accounts it reviewed did not establish a count of how many times Jones used the word in his opening, so no count should be treated as confirmed.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
How do the parties differ on the wider workplace claims?
The slur dispute is only one part of the case. The parties’ reported positions extend to whether the claims show a company-wide pattern and how Tesla handled complaints:
| Issue | CRD’s position or allegations | Tesla’s reported position |
|---|---|---|
| Workplace conduct | CRD alleges racial harassment, including slurs, alongside discriminatory assignments, pay, and retaliation. | Jones argued that the state lacked suitable evidence that racial harassment was Tesla’s standard operating procedure. |
| Complaints and response | The department’s case includes allegations of harassment involving supervisors and managers. | Bloomberg Law reported that Tesla argued its human-resources and employee-resources teams responded to complaints. |
Bloomberg Law reported that the case concerns more than 6,000 Black workers. That reported figure describes the population involved in the case; it is not a count of trial witnesses or, by itself, proof of a court-certified damages class.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What does the reported pay difference show?
CRD said one analysis of worker pay data from June 2018 through June 2024 found that Black workers received $1,533 less in monthly compensation than white workers. This is an agency-reported analysis for that stated period, not a finding adopted by the judge. The figure should not be read as a proven amount owed to any individual employee or as the outcome of the trial.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How is this different from Tesla’s earlier case involving Owen Diaz?
Owen Diaz’s federal case is separate from the CRD’s state trial. The Associated Press reported that a jury awarded Diaz $137 million in 2021, the judge reduced that award to $15 million, and a later retrial resulted in $3.2 million in damages. Diaz and Tesla settled in 2024 for an undisclosed amount. Those proceedings do not decide the allegations in the CRD case.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
