A Forrester Consulting study commissioned by Paycom projects a 362% three-year return on investment for a modeled 500-employee organization using Paycom’s integrated human capital management (HCM) software. That is a financial-model result based on interviewed Paycom customers—not a measured return guaranteed to Paycom buyers generally. Its usefulness depends on how closely an employer’s workforce, systems and administrative workload resemble the model.
What the study found
Paycom announced the study on June 25, 2025. Forrester Consulting’s Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) analysis modeled a composite organization with 500 employees, six HR employees and 40 managers using Paycom tools across five product suites. The model projected these results:
| Modeled finding | How to interpret it |
|---|---|
| 362% three-year ROI | A projected return after accounting for modeled costs and benefits, for the composite organization—not a result established for every Paycom customer. |
| More than 45% annual HR time savings | A modeled reduction in HR time spent on covered activities. Time recovered is not automatically an equivalent cut in payroll expense or headcount. |
| 80% less time on compliance work | A modeled reduction in time spent on specified compliance and audit-related tasks, not elimination of legal obligations or compliance risk. |
| $1.4 million three-year NPV | The model’s net present value estimate over three years, not audited cash savings for all organizations. |
| $300,000 annual savings from data visibility and analytics | An annual benefit attributed in Paycom’s materials to improved data visibility and analytics in the model; it should not be treated as guaranteed cash savings. |
The announcement describes the study as a Forrester Consulting engagement commissioned by Paycom. Paycom’s study summary presents the composite-company assumptions and headline estimates. Those figures make the study a quantified business case, but its commissioned, modeled design matters when applying the numbers to a purchasing decision.
What Paycom’s automated HR technology covers
The analysis concerns more than payroll automation. It evaluates an integrated HCM environment spanning HR, payroll, time and labor, talent acquisition and talent management, with information shared across employee workflows. Paycom describes its HR-management software as operating from a single database rather than separate databases for each HR function.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
![Express Schedule Free Employee Scheduling Software [PC/Mac Download]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41yvuCFIVfS._SL160_.jpg)
- Simple shift planning via an easy drag & drop interface
- Add time-off, sick leave, break entries and holidays
- Email schedules directly to your employees
That design aims to reduce duplicate employee records, repeated data entry, manual reconciliation and inconsistent reporting. A single internal database does not mean an employer’s entire technology environment has no integrations: accounting, benefits carriers, identity management, scheduling and industry-specific systems may still need to connect.
How Forrester generated the estimates
Forrester interviewed representatives from organizations using Paycom, combined their experiences into a composite organization, and modeled costs, benefits, flexibility and risk over three years. The model risk-adjusted some benefits rather than assuming every potential gain would occur in full.
One compliance example shows how an estimate was built: the composite spent eight HR hours per week on compliance work, saved 80% of that time, and used a fully burdened HR hourly rate of $55. The model applied a 10% downward risk adjustment to that benefit. These are assumptions within the model, not measurements of every employer’s actual workload or wage costs. The detailed example appears in the Paycom-hosted TEI study.
This approach is more informative than an unsupported marketing claim because it lays out a modeled organization and quantified assumptions. But interviews and a composite model do not amount to a randomized experiment, a broad independent survey of all customers, or proof that Paycom alone caused each modeled improvement. The study qualification is important: the results represent a composite based on interviewed customers.
Where the projected value comes from
Less repetitive work across HR, managers and employees
Connected records and automated workflows may cut manual updates, follow-up, report preparation, corrections and routine approvals. Paycom’s promotional summary reports that the modeled organization saved more than 4,300 HR hours, more than 2,000 manager hours and about 6,000 employee hours annually. These are modeled estimates reported in Tech Times’ June 29, 2025 coverage, not independently established savings for the wider Paycom customer base.
Recovered time can be valuable even when it does not reduce spending: staff may handle more work, improve service or avoid future hiring. It becomes a direct cash saving only if the employer actually reduces an expense or avoids one it otherwise would have incurred.
Compliance and audit-related tasks
More consistent employee data and easier access to records can reduce the effort involved in assembling information for audits and recurring compliance work. The modeled 80% time reduction applies to the specified tasks and assumptions. Employers still need to interpret rules, validate records, review exceptions and meet their legal responsibilities.
Workforce data and analytics
Paycom attributes $300,000 in annual modeled savings to better data visibility and analytics. Potential uses described in coverage include examining turnover in particular roles, planning staffing, monitoring overtime, informing hiring and identifying possible grants or incentives. Those are proposed routes to value, not proof that an HCM platform will independently improve retention, profitability or growth.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Employee and manager self-service
Paycom highlights employee tools for payroll review through Beti®, benefits enrollment, personal-information updates and time-off requests, as well as manager functions such as timesheet approval and mobile access. Self-service can move routine tasks away from HR, but the work still has to be done: employees and managers take action, while HR remains responsible for governance, exceptions, support and oversight.
What the 362% ROI does—and does not—mean
ROI, net present value and time savings describe different things. The 362% figure is the model’s projected return over three years after its modeled costs and benefits. The $1.4 million NPV is a modeled value calculation over that period. Neither figure is revenue, a cash payment, or a promise of realized savings.
Likewise, a percentage reduction in time is not necessarily a matching reduction in labor costs. If saved hours are redeployed to other work, the organization may gain capacity or service quality without lowering its payroll. A buyer should separate hard-dollar savings, avoided future costs and capacity gains rather than combine them as if they were interchangeable.
The announcement also cites a separate Forrester study in which employers reported using an average of 6.17 HCM providers and 80% said disparate or duplicate employee data made accurate workforce reporting more difficult. Those statistics describe a different study; they are not part of the 362% ROI model and should not be read as results of the same experiment.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsWhich organizations may find the case most relevant
The composite’s 500 employees, six HR staff and 40 managers make it a more useful reference point for a mid-sized employer than for every organization. The projected benefits may be more relevant when a company has several hundred or more employees, multiple locations, complex payroll or timekeeping, substantial compliance reporting, and separate systems that require manual reconciliation.
The case may be less informative for a small employer with simple payroll, a company already using a well-integrated HCM platform, or an organization with specialized requirements not represented by the composite. A global, heavily unionized, seasonal or highly distributed workforce may also differ materially from the modeled business.
Trade-offs to weigh before consolidating systems
- Implementation effort: Data migration, payroll parallel testing, configuration, training, historical-data retention and internal change management all consume time and resources. Include them in the business case rather than treating the modeled return as implementation-free.
- Functional fit: Confirm support for the organization’s state and local payroll needs, pay groups, hourly and salaried employees, labor rules, benefits, timekeeping, recruiting, performance management, analytics, mobile use and integrations that cannot be retired.
- Governance and controls: Centralized data increases the importance of role-based permissions, approval flows, audit trails, data-quality checks, access reviews, security and recovery procedures. A data error in a central system can affect multiple workflows.
- Vendor dependence: Consolidation can simplify administration, but it can also raise switching costs, reduce best-of-breed flexibility and make a vendor outage more consequential. It may require broader adoption across departments than some teams prefer.
- Alternatives: Compare an integrated platform with a best-of-breed stack, an existing enterprise HCM suite, a payroll bureau, outsourced HR or a modular platform. The right approach depends on current fragmentation, functionality and the cost of changing—not on a single ROI headline.
Automation also does not remove HR accountability. Paycom’s own material says it is not a “set it and forget it” process and does not replace HR professionals; staff still need to review exceptions, correct inputs, validate payroll and handle unusual employment events. See Paycom’s discussion of holistic HR automation.
How to test the business case for your organization
Build a three-year estimate using your own workload and costs. Start with a baseline, then model a conservative case as well as an optimistic one; the study’s assumptions are a reference, not a substitute for your figures.
Quick Recap
- Measure current workload: Estimate weekly or annual HR, payroll, manager and employee hours spent on repetitive data entry, reconciliation, approvals, reporting and compliance tasks.
- Assign realistic costs: Use fully burdened hourly labor costs for the people doing the work. Separate hours that may be redeployed from hours that could actually reduce overtime, contract work or planned hiring.
- Inventory current spend: Add software subscriptions, integrations, support, payroll services and internal system-maintenance costs that a new platform would replace. Do not assume every existing tool can be retired.
- Include transition costs: Estimate implementation fees, internal project time, data cleanup, parallel payroll runs, training, integration work and temporary disruption.
- Use conservative benefit assumptions: Apply smaller time savings than the modeled figures unless your baseline and vendor demonstration support more. Keep capacity gains distinct from hard-dollar savings.
- Model three years and test sensitivity: Compare net benefits with total costs, then rerun the calculation with benefits cut in half and implementation taking longer than planned. Identify whether the case still works under those conditions.
Questions to ask Paycom and other vendors
- What is the total three-year cost, including implementation, support, integrations and any mandatory modules?
- Which payroll, time, benefits and HR functions are included, and which are separately priced?
- How long will implementation take for an organization with similar employee count and complexity?
- What is the plan for data migration, historical records and parallel payroll testing?
- Can the vendor provide customer references with a comparable workforce and system environment?
- How will automation savings be measured after deployment, and what baseline data is needed?
- Which integrations will remain necessary, and what happens if the platform or a connected system is unavailable?
- How are access controls, audit trails, data exports and an eventual transition away from the platform handled?
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
