What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
No $109 billion damages award followed Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI. On May 18, 2026, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers dismissed the case after adopting a jury’s finding that Musk waited too long to sue. The ruling did not order OpenAI to pay damages, reverse its commercial structure, or remove Sam Altman.
What Musk alleged about OpenAI
Musk helped co-found and fund OpenAI as a nonprofit organization intended to develop artificial intelligence for broad human benefit. He later alleged that Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and OpenAI-related entities shifted the organization toward a profit-driven structure in breach of its founding commitments. His claims also challenged OpenAI’s commercial relationship with Microsoft and alleged unjust enrichment and related misconduct. Those were Musk’s allegations, not findings that the court ultimately made.
The case, Musk v. Altman et al., was filed on August 5, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It was assigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. The official court case page provides the case record and docket access; the case is also indexed at GovInfo.
Where the $109 billion figure came from
The figure was a damages expert’s estimate tied to the alleged value OpenAI and Microsoft obtained from the conduct Musk challenged. It was not a court judgment, a confirmed debt, or a guaranteed recovery. One account described a broader expert range of approximately $78.8 billion to $135 billion; another identified roughly $109 billion as the upper figure the judge allowed Musk’s expert to present. Coverage also used figures around $130 billion, $134 billion or $150 billion for different descriptions of Musk’s damages theory at different stages. These figures are not interchangeable. The Information’s account of the expert estimate describes the $109 billion figure in the context of the trial.
#1 Best Overall
- OpenAI develops a unified AI platform designed to act as a proactive assistant for daily life. OpenAI provides advanced reasoning, multimodal search, and agentic workflows that simplify complex tasks to expand what individuals and teams can build.
- OpenAI is for entrepreneurs, teachers and students, artists and scientific researchers. OpenAI is for those building AI-native projects, creating art, or working with data workflows who need a digital agent to accelerate learning and project completion.
- Lightweight, Classic fit, Double-needle sleeve and bottom hem
Musk’s theory concerned alleged gains, not simply OpenAI’s company valuation. A private company’s valuation does not automatically establish legally recoverable damages. Musk’s expert also attributed disputed portions of alleged gains to Microsoft and OpenAI; those calculations were not findings that either company owed the sums claimed.
Why the judge dismissed the case
The decisive question at trial was whether Musk brought his claims within the applicable time limits. The jury found that he waited too long. It served in an advisory role, and Judge Gonzalez Rogers adopted its finding and dismissed the claims on May 18, 2026. The Associated Press’s trial account describes the limitations issue and the jury’s role; its report on the result covers the dismissal.
Rank #2
- OpenAI develops a unified AI platform designed to act as a proactive assistant for daily life. OpenAI provides advanced reasoning, multimodal search, and agentic workflows that simplify complex tasks to expand what individuals and teams can build.
- OpenAI is for entrepreneurs, teachers and students, artists and scientific researchers. OpenAI is for those building AI-native projects, creating art, or working with data workflows who need a digital agent to accelerate learning and project completion.
- Lightweight, Classic fit, Double-needle sleeve and bottom hem
In this case, the limitations analysis turned on when Musk knew or should have known about the alleged conduct and on the rules applicable to particular claims. Reporting described different periods for different theories, including three years for a charitable-trust theory and two years for unjust-enrichment claims. Those periods should not be treated as a universal deadline for every lawsuit involving OpenAI or as a ruling that all possible claims are time-barred.
Because the case ended on timeliness grounds, the court did not calculate damages or order OpenAI to pay the estimated amount. The judgment resolved Musk’s claims in this action; it was not a comprehensive decision declaring every OpenAI restructuring decision lawful or every allegation factually false.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Rank #3
- OpenAI develops a unified AI platform designed to act as a proactive assistant for daily life. OpenAI provides advanced reasoning, multimodal search, and agentic workflows that simplify complex tasks to expand what individuals and teams can build.
- OpenAI is for entrepreneurs, teachers and students, artists and scientific researchers. OpenAI is for those building AI-native projects, creating art, or working with data workflows who need a digital agent to accelerate learning and project completion.
- 8.5 oz, Classic fit, Twill-taped neck
What Musk had asked the court to do
Musk’s requested relief went beyond a personal damages payment. Reports described a request for any monetary recovery to go to OpenAI’s charitable or nonprofit arm, along with measures aimed at the organization’s governance and commercial structure. The requested remedies also included removing Altman or other executives from leadership and restoring a nonprofit-oriented mission. CBS News’s account of the dismissal describes the remedies at issue.
None of those remedies was ordered: there was no damages award, no order unwinding OpenAI’s commercial structure, and no order removing Altman.
Rank #4
- OpenAI develops a unified AI platform designed to act as a proactive assistant for daily life. OpenAI provides advanced reasoning, multimodal search, and agentic workflows that simplify complex tasks to expand what individuals and teams can build.
- OpenAI is for entrepreneurs, teachers and students, artists and scientific researchers. OpenAI is for those building AI-native projects, creating art, or working with data workflows who need a digital agent to accelerate learning and project completion.
- Lightweight, Classic fit, Double-needle sleeve and bottom hem
What the result means for OpenAI, Microsoft and Musk
OpenAI
The judgment did not require OpenAI to reverse its commercial arrangements or restructure its organization. It left those matters undisturbed in this lawsuit, but does not by itself resolve separate governance, nonprofit-law, regulatory or other legal questions.
Microsoft
Musk alleged that Microsoft benefited from OpenAI’s shift toward a commercial structure. The amounts attributed to Microsoft were disputed litigation estimates, not a finding of liability or an order to pay.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Best Value
- OpenAI develops a unified AI platform designed to act as a proactive assistant for daily life. OpenAI provides advanced reasoning, multimodal search, and agentic workflows that simplify complex tasks to expand what individuals and teams can build.
- OpenAI is for entrepreneurs, teachers and students, artists and scientific researchers. OpenAI is for those building AI-native projects, creating art, or working with data workflows who need a digital agent to accelerate learning and project completion.
- Lightweight, Classic fit, Double-needle sleeve and bottom hem
Musk and xAI
OpenAI’s defense argued that Musk’s lawsuit was partly motivated by competition with xAI, the AI company he founded in 2023. That was the defense’s characterization, not an established finding by the court. The case also brought public attention to OpenAI’s nonprofit origins, governance and Microsoft relationship, but those broader issues are distinct from the ruling on when Musk sued.
What remains open after the judgment
The May 18 judgment ended the trial-level case. An appeal, if pursued, would be a separate phase. The available reporting does not establish whether Musk filed a notice of appeal, so the current status should be checked on the court docket.
The decision also does not settle every question about OpenAI’s history or corporate structure. It means Musk could not obtain relief on these claims in this action after the court accepted the finding that they were filed too late. Other claims by other parties, or separate regulatory and governance issues, are not decided merely by this judgment.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
