Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteThe available reporting does not identify an IBM chemical-suit plaintiff who died at 63. It documents several distinct lawsuits involving alleged chemical exposure at IBM facilities, but none of the cited accounts verifies that age or connects it to a named plaintiff. The cases had different outcomes, and the settlements did not establish that IBM was liable.
Why the plaintiff cannot be identified
IBM chemical-exposure litigation was a group of cases, not one clearly identifiable lawsuit. Workers and family members brought claims connected to semiconductor, hard-disk, and clean-room operations at facilities including East Fishkill, New York, and San Jose, California. A 2001 Los Angeles Times report said more than 220 IBM employees and family members were involved in related litigation. The available case reporting does not establish which person the phrase “plaintiff dies at 63” refers to, or verify the death-at-63 detail.
The claims described in the reporting alleged exposure to chemicals used in manufacturing, including trichloroethylene, sulfuric acid, benzene, acetone, xylene, and formaldehyde. Plaintiffs alleged injuries including cancer, wrongful death, and birth defects. IBM disputed the allegations.
What happened in the reported cases
| Case or group | Claim described in reporting | Reported outcome |
|---|---|---|
| William Pfleging and his daughter Alyssa | Pfleging worked at IBM’s East Fishkill facility from 1973 to 1976. His family alleged workplace chemical exposure was connected to Alyssa’s severe congenital limb deformities; she was born on December 24, 1974. | New York courts dismissed the claims as time-barred. |
| Michael Ruffing and Faye Carlton | Former East Fishkill employees whose case concerned their son’s birth defects. | IBM settled in January 2001. The terms were not disclosed, and IBM admitted no liability. |
| Candace Curtis | A case involving alleged workplace-related injuries. | IBM settled in March 2004 on confidential terms. IBM said it believed it had no liability and that its workplace did not cause the injuries. |
| Alida Hernandez and James Moore | Cancer claims brought in California. | A jury found IBM not liable. After mediation, about 100 California IBM chemical cases were dismissed, according to EE Times in 2004. |
| Russell Woron | He alleged exposure at IBM East Fishkill and was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in September 1997. | An appellate court affirmed dismissal of his case as time-barred. |
These outcomes are not interchangeable: a settlement resolves a claim without necessarily deciding who was legally responsible, while a verdict or dismissal applies to the particular case and its record. The cited reporting does not establish that any one of these cases is the plaintiff described as dying at 63.
#1 Best Overall
What the reported settlements and dismissals do—and do not—show
Settlements were not admissions of liability
The terms of the Ruffing-Carlton settlement were undisclosed, and IBM admitted no liability. Curtis’s settlement was also confidential. In its 2004 statement about Curtis’s case, IBM spokesman Christopher Andrews said the company firmly believed it had no liability and that its workplace did not cause the plaintiff’s injuries, as reported by the Los Angeles Times.
Dismissals and a defense verdict had different procedural meanings
The Pfleging and Woron claims were dismissed as time-barred, according to the cited New York case reporting. That is a procedural outcome, not a finding that exposure did or did not cause the alleged injuries. In California, the jury found IBM not liable in Hernandez and Moore’s cancer claims. Separately, after mediation, about 100 California cases were dismissed; EE Times reported in 2004 that about 110 cancer and birth-defect cases remained pending in Westchester County, New York.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
What is known about deaths in the litigation
A 1998 Reuters report republished by the Los Angeles Times described five former IBM employees as having died of cancer in a California wrongful-death suit. That account does not identify any of them as a plaintiff who died at 63. Nor does the available reporting link that age to the named New York cases above. Without a case-specific obituary or court record establishing the connection, naming a person would risk conflating separate claims.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
