Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →A May 2006 EE Times article reported on an alleged counterfeit company that had appropriated NEC’s corporate identity and brand—not merely copied individual electronic devices. The account summarized a report in the International Herald Tribune; the allegations and details below are attributed to that reporting, not presented as independently verified findings.
What the 2006 report said
Peter Clarke’s May 4, 2006, EE Times article summarized an International Herald Tribune report about an alleged counterfeit NEC company. According to the account, the operation was based mainly in China and appeared to be controlled by entities in Japan and Taiwan. The report said the alleged company came to light after two years of investigation, but the article did not describe the investigation’s methods or identify those entities.
The story concerned the alleged appropriation of an entire company identity and brand. It was not limited to counterfeit versions of particular NEC products.
Products and reported business activity
The alleged company reportedly had a portfolio of about 50 counterfeit products. EE Times listed home entertainment systems, MP3 players, batteries, microphones and DVD players. It also reported that the operation copied NEC products and developed some products that were not part of NEC’s legitimate range. A 2007 EE Times retrospective repeated the approximate portfolio count and examples.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
#1 Best Overall
The 2006 article said the alleged company awarded manufacturing contracts and licensed Chinese companies to use its designs, all under the NEC brand. Those activities were reported allegations; the sources do not establish them through a court finding or provide underlying contracts.
What NEC’s legal executive said—and what remained undisclosed
EE Times quoted Fujio Okada, whom the article identified as NEC’s senior vice president and general manager of its legal division, describing the entities as “part of a sophisticated ring, coordinated by two key entities based in Taiwan and Japan, which has attempted to completely assume the NEC brand.” This was an attributed statement, not an independent determination of the alleged entities’ conduct.
Rank #2
- NEC Sharp 43" Ultra High Definition Commercial Display
The article said NEC declined to identify the alleged offenders for legal reasons and could not estimate the value of goods sold by the operation. The available accounts do not establish the entities’ names, sales total, any court outcome or what happened to the operation after publication. The figure of about 50 products is an approximate count reported by EE Times, not an independently audited inventory.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why this was more than ordinary product counterfeiting
Counterfeiting often means copying or mislabeling individual goods. In this account, the allegation went further: the company was said to have used NEC’s identity to present a portfolio under the brand, arrange manufacturing and license designs. That distinction describes the scope of the reported allegation; it does not resolve who controlled the operation or establish its legal status.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesQuick Recap
Best Value
- Slim Design and Integrated Speakers – the aesthetic design is pleasing to the eye and enables easy, low cost installation.
- Future Ready Connectivity – featuring multiple industry standard digital and analogue signal inputs for flexible integration into AV infrastructures.
- Effortless content playback – the integrated USB media player supports various image video file formats for effortless and standalone content playback.
Rank #4
- Panel technology IPS
- Aspect ratio 16: 9
- Pixel Pitch 0. 31 mm
- Viewable image size 27 "
- Native resolution 1920x1080
Rank #3
- Create pixel-perfect imagery at a cost-conscious price point with the new fully commercial SHARP
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
