On January 24, 2025, The Wall Street Journal reported that Elon Musk emailed X employees: “Our user growth is stagnant, revenue is unimpressive, and we’re barely breaking even.” Musk denied sending the message. Because X is privately held and no independently verifiable full copy was established in the available coverage, the email should be treated as a reported—but disputed—account, not an audited financial disclosure.
What was reported
The Wall Street Journal’s report connected the alleged internal message to news that banks were preparing to sell billions of dollars in loans used to finance Musk’s $44 billion purchase of Twitter in 2022. Contemporaneous coverage, including The Verge, quoted the message as saying: “Our user growth is stagnant, revenue is unimpressive, and we’re barely breaking even.”
The available reports did not establish that the message was sent to every X employee, nor did they publish an independently authenticated full copy of the email. It is therefore more accurate to call it a reported internal email than a confirmed company-wide announcement.
Musk denied sending it
Musk reportedly responded that he “did not send such an email,” according to follow-up coverage. That denial is central to the story. It means headlines saying Musk “admitted” that X was failing or losing money go beyond the available evidence.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstall#1 Best Overall
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
The strongest supported conclusion is: The Wall Street Journal reported the wording, but Musk denied sending the email, and the available coverage did not independently authenticate the complete message.
What does “barely breaking even” mean?
The phrase sounds like a precise financial result, but it is not an accounting metric by itself. Depending on what Musk allegedly meant, it could refer to:
- Operating break-even: revenue roughly matched ordinary operating expenses.
- EBITDA break-even: earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization were approximately zero.
- Cash-flow break-even: cash received roughly matched cash expenses during a period.
- Net-income break-even: the company was approximately profitable after interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other costs.
Those measures can produce very different results. X carried substantial acquisition debt, so it could potentially be operationally profitable while still losing money after interest expense. Conversely, positive EBITDA would not necessarily mean that X was generating cash after debt payments, restructuring costs, capital spending or other expenses.
Accordingly, the quote does not prove that X was insolvent, bankrupt or necessarily losing money. It also does not provide audited profit figures or identify an accounting period.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsRank #3
Why the debt sale mattered
Musk’s acquisition involved approximately $13 billion in debt arranged by banks, according to the debt-sale reporting summarized by Benzinga. Banks had expected to sell or syndicate the loans to other investors, but reportedly remained stuck holding them as uncertainty surrounding X’s business and valuation made the debt difficult to place.
In January 2025, banks were reportedly considering sales at about 90 to 95 cents on the dollar—roughly a 5% to 10% discount from face value. The mechanics were:
Rank #4
- Banks committed financing for the acquisition.
- They expected to distribute the loans to investors.
- Weak or uncertain business performance reduced demand for the debt.
- The banks remained exposed to X’s loans.
- A discounted sale could reduce that exposure, while potentially locking in a loss relative to face value.
A discounted loan price is a signal about lenders’ risk and market demand. It is not the same as a formal bankruptcy event, and it is not automatically a definitive valuation of X’s equity.
Why user growth and “record usage” are not the same
The reported email’s claim that user growth was stagnant appeared to conflict with Musk’s public claims about strong or record usage, including around major political and news events in 2024. Both statements could theoretically coexist because they may describe different measures.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Best Value
- Brand: Generic
- [0593418573] [978-0593418574] A book Unreasonable Hospitality: The Remarkable Power of Giving People More Than They Expect Hardcover Guidara 2022
- A major event can produce a short-term spike in activity without adding many lasting users.
- Daily active users, monthly active users, registered accounts, logged-in users and time spent are different metrics.
- Engagement can increase while advertising revenue declines.
- High usage is not proof that the usage is monetizable or that advertisers are paying higher rates.
The reported wording appears to distinguish durable user growth from short-term activity, although that interpretation is an inference rather than a directly stated explanation.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.The business context
X remained heavily dependent on advertising. After Musk’s takeover, large staff reductions and changes to content-moderation and brand-safety policies were followed by reports that major advertisers paused or reduced spending. Musk also publicly criticized advertisers during the dispute.
X introduced subscriptions and creator-revenue-sharing programs as alternative or additional sources of income. X’s official creator-revenue-sharing terms confirm that such a program exists, but they do not show how much revenue it generates or whether it is profitable. Revenue diversification, by itself, does not establish that lost advertising income had been replaced.
What can actually be concluded?
| Question | Best-supported answer |
|---|---|
| Was the email reported? | Yes. The Wall Street Journal reported the wording on January 24, 2025. |
| Is the complete email publicly authenticated? | Not by the available coverage. |
| Did Musk acknowledge sending it? | No. He denied sending it. |
| Does the phrase prove X was insolvent? | No. |
| Does it provide audited financial data? | No. The accounting measure and period are unknown. |
| Why was the report important? | It suggested internal concern about growth and revenue while banks were reportedly trying to reduce exposure to X acquisition debt. |
What happened afterward?
The January 2025 report is a historical account, not a current financial update. X’s private-company status limits the regular, independently reviewable financial disclosures available for a listed company. Later online claims about X’s valuation—including summaries suggesting a value of approximately $44 billion in March 2025—do not, without details about the transaction, valuation method and date, establish audited revenue or profitability.
Nor would a later valuation by itself prove that the reported email was false. Debt pricing, equity valuation, revenue, usage and cash flow measure different aspects of a private company’s condition.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
