Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallFujitsu Europe CEO Paul Patterson was reported by Parliament’s Business and Trade Committee to be moving to a non-executive role managing Fujitsu’s response to the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry. The committee said the move would follow his appearance before MPs. Its account does not say he left Fujitsu, give the full terms or effective date of the role, or explain his personal reasons.
Which CEO stepped down after the Post Office scandal?
The reported executive is Paul Patterson, Fujitsu Europe’s chief executive—not a Post Office chief executive. The parliamentary committee described a move to a non-executive position “managing the company’s response” to the inquiry. That is the committee’s description of the role, not a statement from Patterson. The report establishes a change in role; it does not establish that he quit Fujitsu or disclose his complete subsequent status.
The role change should not be treated as an admission of liability, a settlement, or evidence that Fujitsu contributed to compensation. The cited parliamentary account does not specify those matters.
Why the Horizon scandal is described as a miscarriage of justice
Horizon, a computer system used in Post Office branches, was implicated in the wrongful suspension, termination and prosecution of sub-postmasters over more than two decades. The Criminal Cases Review Commission describes the scandal as “the most widespread miscarriage of justice the CCRC had ever seen” and “the biggest single series of wrongful convictions in UK legal history.”
#1 Best Overall
The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry is an independent statutory inquiry examining the system’s implementation and failures. Its first volume of the final report, published on 8 July 2025, focused on the human impact of the scandal and redress.
How much compensation has been paid—and how many are still waiting?
In a report published on 13 March 2026, Parliament’s Business and Trade Committee said more than 11,300 claimants had received payments and £1.44 billion had been distributed. Those are figures in the committee’s report snapshot, not an October 2026 live total. The committee also reported that thousands were still waiting and said serious structural failings in redress persisted.
These figures describe claimant payments across the reported redress process; they do not establish that every affected person has been paid or that every claim has been resolved. The committee’s report, Post Office Horizon IT scandal: ‘serious structural failings persist’ in redress, sets out its findings.
What has happened since the inquiry’s first report?
- 8 July 2025: The inquiry published Volume 1 of its final report, on human impact and redress.
- 12 February 2026: The Department for Business and Trade published the government’s response to Volume 1. It accepted a recommendation to explain what “full and fair” redress means and described further consideration of how redress should be delivered.
- 13 March 2026: The Business and Trade Committee reported on payments, people still waiting and structural failings in redress.
- 19 June 2026: The committee published the government’s response to its later report, recording that the government accepted fully or partly 11 of 14 recommendations. The report also noted continuing disagreement over compensation arrangements.
- 8 July 2026: The inquiry’s reports and statements index recorded a Chair’s update on the remainder of the final report. This was an update, not publication of the remaining report itself.
The inquiry’s first volume, the government’s response, and the committee’s scrutiny address related but distinct stages: findings, implementation and parliamentary oversight. The inquiry index and Department for Business and Trade’s Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry collection provide the relevant official material.
What does Patterson’s role change mean for Fujitsu accountability?
Fujitsu’s role in Horizon and the Post Office’s responsibility for prosecutions and redress are separate lines of accountability. Patterson’s reported move puts him in a non-executive role overseeing Fujitsu’s inquiry response, but the cited report does not establish the full scope of his responsibilities or the company’s definitive financial contribution to redress. The role change alone cannot answer either question.
There is no direct, named-person explanation of Patterson’s decision in the cited official account. Readers should therefore distinguish what Parliament reported about his role from claims about why he moved or what Fujitsu may owe.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
