Fujitsu Europe CEO Paul Patterson was due to leave that role in March 2026 and become non-executive chairman of Fujitsu UK, while continuing to manage the company’s response to the Post Office Horizon inquiry. The move was reported by Computer Weekly on 29 January 2026, which used the phrase “falls on his sword.” That was the report’s characterization, not a formal explanation from Fujitsu. The announcement did not specify a compensation agreement or payment.
What was changing in Patterson’s role?
Fujitsu said Patterson would move from CEO of Fujitsu Europe to non-executive chairman of Fujitsu UK in March 2026. The company said he would continue managing its response to the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry. The announcement described a change of role; it did not say that he was leaving Fujitsu or that a settlement with victims had been reached.
The distinction matters because the headline’s “before settling” wording can suggest that a settlement was imminent or completed. The dated statements available here establish neither. They show that the question of Fujitsu’s contribution to redress was still open in early 2026.
Has Fujitsu agreed to pay compensation?
No amount or completed settlement is established in the cited statements. On 6 January 2026, Patterson told MPs that he stood by his view that Fujitsu had a moral obligation to offer financial redress, but he did not give a figure, according to The Guardian’s account of his evidence.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →#1 Best Overall
Fujitsu said on 9 July 2025: “We have apologised for, and deeply regret, our role in sub-postmasters’ suffering, and we wish to reiterate that apology today.” Its statement also described engagement with government over compensation. An apology and discussion of an obligation are not the same as an agreed sum or a payment.
On 13 March 2026, the UK Parliament Business and Trade Committee said Fujitsu had “contributed nothing to the bill for redress.” That is the committee’s dated account; it does not establish Fujitsu’s position after that date.
What was the position on victims’ redress?
In its 13 March 2026 update, the Business and Trade Committee reported that more than 11,300 claimants had received £1.44 billion. The committee also said thousands were still waiting and identified continuing structural problems in the redress process. These figures describe the position reported by the committee on that date, not a current total.
The committee’s update placed Fujitsu’s lack of contribution alongside the wider redress effort and its concerns about public-sector revenues. It did not say that Fujitsu’s contribution was a condition for claimants to receive redress. The payment total and Fujitsu’s contribution status are separate facts: one records redress received by claimants, while the other records what the committee said Fujitsu had paid by 13 March 2026.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
How financial redress differs from restorative justice
Financial redress and restorative justice are separate responses. The former concerns compensation; the latter is intended to give affected postmasters a way to be heard and to support healing. The government, Fujitsu and the Post Office described a restorative-justice pilot in a joint statement on 31 October 2025.
| Track | What it addresses | Dated information |
|---|---|---|
| Financial redress | Compensation for affected claimants | The Business and Trade Committee reported more than 11,300 recipients and £1.44 billion paid on 13 March 2026; it said Fujitsu had contributed nothing to the redress bill. |
| Restorative justice | Listening, wellbeing and opportunities for postmasters to share experiences | The 31 October 2025 joint statement described a pilot and said longer-term programme plans were expected in spring 2026. The statement itself does not confirm what followed. |
The pilot described in the joint statement included listening and wellbeing support, group circles, individual meetings and a peer support network. The statement said 145 current and former postmasters took part in five in-person sessions and two online meetings. Those participation figures and activities were reported on 31 October 2025; they are not evidence that the pilot had become a permanent programme.
Rank #4
Where to find official information about conviction redress
The Post Office’s information page describes the scandal as involving Horizon’s reliability, postmasters’ contracts and the organisation’s culture at the time. It directs people whose Horizon-related convictions have been overturned to the Department for Business and Trade’s Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme. That signpost is for conviction-related redress; the available information here does not establish eligibility or give application instructions for any individual case.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
