Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDrake sued Universal Music Group (UMG), not Kendrick Lamar, over UMG’s release and promotion of Kendrick Lamar’s song “Not Like Us.” A federal judge dismissed Drake’s case on October 9, 2025, finding that the song’s challenged statements were nonactionable opinion in the context of a rap battle. Drake appealed; as of October 8, 2026, the appeal had no decision listed on the docket page reviewed here. A September 2026 report says oral argument is scheduled for December 4, 2026, but that date is still in the future and was not independently confirmed on the court’s live calendar.
What Drake alleged against UMG
Aubrey Drake Graham filed his federal complaint against UMG Recordings, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on January 15, 2025. He alleged that UMG knowingly published and promoted “Not Like Us,” whose lyrics and accompanying material, he argued, falsely insinuated that he had sexual relations with minors.
The complaint pleaded defamation, second-degree harassment, and a claim under New York General Business Law § 349, the state’s consumer-protection law. Those were Drake’s allegations, not findings that UMG’s conduct or the song’s insinuations were true. Kendrick Lamar was not named as a defendant in this federal lawsuit.
The complaint also recounted earlier pre-litigation actions in New York and Texas involving allegations that the song’s metrics had been artificially inflated. Those allegations were distinct from the claims decided in the federal case; the dismissal did not establish that streaming manipulation or payola occurred.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11#1 Best Overall
Why the judge dismissed the lawsuit
On October 9, 2025, U.S. District Judge Jeannette A. Vargas granted UMG’s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). She concluded that the challenged statements in the song were nonactionable opinion when considered in context.
The court viewed the lyrics against the setting of a heated rap battle, in which both participants exchanged incendiary accusations. In the judge’s view, a reasonable listener would not take “Not Like Us” as communicating verifiable facts about Drake. The court also considered the song’s cover image, which used a doctored, sex-offender-marker-style depiction of Drake’s home. It reasoned that a reasonable person would not believe law enforcement had designated thirteen people living there as sex offenders.
Rank #2
- INTERACTIVE FEATURES: Lifelike baby doll that simulates breathing, cooing, and heartbeat sounds for an incredibly realistic nurturing experience
- AUTHENTIC DESIGN: Created by Master Artist Linda Murray with RealTouch vinyl soft skin, hand-rooted hair, and fully poseable cloth body
- REALISTIC DETAILS: 19-inch doll is weighted to feel like a real baby and includes a gentle baby powder scent for added authenticity
- ADORABLE OUTFIT: Dressed in a pink ruffled floral sleeper with rosebud buttons and matching flowered hair bow
- BATTERY OPERATION: Requires 3 AA batteries (not included) to activate interactive breathing and sound features
“Although the accusation that Plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not incline the reasonable listener to believe that ‘Not Like Us’ imparts verifiable facts about Plaintiff.”
The ruling was a legal conclusion about whether the challenged material could support the claims as pleaded, not a finding that the allegations in the song were true. The court’s reasoning turned on how a reasonable listener would understand the song and image in their context.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Did Drake sue Kendrick Lamar?
No. The federal defendant was UMG Recordings, Inc. Drake’s complaint accused the label of knowingly publishing and promoting the song; it did not name Kendrick Lamar as a defendant. The case therefore concerned Drake’s claims against the label, rather than a lawsuit against Lamar.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What happens next in Drake’s UMG appeal?
Drake appealed the dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, case No. 25-2758. The docket page reviewed lists Drake’s opening brief, UMG’s response, amicus activity, and Drake’s reply filings, with its latest visible entries dated April 20, 2026. That page does not show an appellate decision.
Rank #4
- INTERACTIVE FEATURES: Touch-activated baby doll responds to gentle touches or butterfly kisses on her cheek with realistic cooing sounds, creating an engaging interactive experience
- LIFELIKE DESIGN: Handcrafted with baby-soft RealTouch vinyl skin, hand-painted features, hand-rooted curls, and realistic fingernails and toenails for amazing realism
- ARTIST CRAFTED: Created by award-winning Master Doll Artist Waltraud Hanl, featuring fully poseable limbs and an expressive face that perfectly captures the artist's original sculpture
- COMFORT FEATURES: Soft cloth body specially designed for comfortable holding and cuddling, with a delightful baby powder scent for added realism
- CHARMING OUTFIT: Comes dressed in an exclusive one-piece outfit featuring pretty butterfly patterns and a matching red bow, measures approximately 19 inches in length
An IndieCut report published September 23, 2026, says oral argument is scheduled for December 4, 2026. Because the date is in the future as of October 8, 2026, argument has not yet occurred. The reported date should be treated as a report, not as independently confirmed by the court’s live calendar. The appeal remains unresolved on the docket page reviewed here.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
