Driver FixRecommendedSound, Wi-Fi or graphics acting up? Check drivers firstFind missing or outdated drivers fast.Check DriversOctober DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsWindows FixRecommendedWindows errors stealing your time? Find the fix fastScan stability, cleanup and performance issues.Fix Now×
Skip to content
The Finance Base
The Money Desk · Blog
Re:

Did David Faustino Get Residuals From Married… with Children? What He Said

David Faustino said the cast was paid well while filming Married... with Children but did not share meaningfully in later residuals. The contract explanation and his billion-dollar figure have not been independently verified in the available reporting.
From TheFinanceBase Team2 min to read

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

David Faustino said he and his Married… with Children castmates earned good weekly pay while filming but did not receive a meaningful share of the money the show later made. He blamed the arrangement on Fox being a cable network at the time and the show being covered by a cable contract. That is Faustino’s explanation as reported in a secondary account—not an independently verified finding about the contract or the cast’s accounts.

What Faustino said about the show’s residuals

Realestate.com.au reproduced remarks it attributed to NBC Washington in which Faustino contrasted his pay during production with payments after the series was reused. He said the cast received “really good money” and “great weekly pay checks” while making the show, but that they “got screwed over” on residuals.

In the same account, Faustino explained: “Fox at the time was not a network, it was a cable network, and so it was under a cable contract.” The report does not establish the contract’s wording, how it treated different kinds of later use, or whether all cast members had the same terms. The explanation should therefore be understood as Faustino’s account, not a legal conclusion about what the contract required. Realestate.com.au’s reproduced report attributes the remarks to NBC Washington; the linked NBC Washington page was inaccessible to the reporting reviewed here.

What is—and is not—known about the money

Faustino was quoted as saying the show had made “over a billion dollars.” The account supplies no accounting period or definition of “made,” and no independent calculation is provided. It does not establish that figure as profit, syndication revenue, or a pool of money owed to the actors.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

The available reporting does not document Faustino’s total earnings from the series, a specific residual amount, or a cast-wide payment schedule. His comments distinguish weekly production pay from later residuals, but they do not quantify either category. Nor do they establish that every performer’s contract or payment history matched his.

Why a cable-contract explanation is not the same as a verified contract finding

Residuals depend on the terms that apply to a production and the uses covered by those terms. Faustino connected the outcome he described to Fox’s status and a cable contract. The material available does not include that contract or an independent accounting, so it cannot show which contractual provisions controlled, how they applied to particular reruns or other uses, or whether a different performer had different terms.

That distinction matters when interpreting the claim: Faustino’s remarks are evidence of what he said about his compensation, not enough by themselves to calculate what he was owed or determine the contractual rights of the rest of the cast.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

Later ownership and a stalled revival are separate issues

A June 10, 2026, Us Weekly report says Sony owns Married… with Children and recounts Faustino’s account of signing onto a possible revival centered on Bud Bundy. He said cast members were expected to appear in recurring roles, but the project stalled after concern that its story was moving too far from the original. This is context about a potential revival, not evidence confirming the terms or outcome of the original series’ residual arrangements.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Quick Recap

SaleBestseller No. 3
Married With Children: Season 5
Married With Children: Season 5
Factory sealed DVD
$9.99
SaleBestseller No. 4
Married With Children: Season One
Married With Children: Season One
Factory sealed DVD
$11.35
Rank #4
Rank #3

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

More post from the Money Desk

  1. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 267 minMortgage Escrow FAQs: Taxes, Insurance, Shortages, and Refunds
  2. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow Mortgage Escrow Accounts Work and What Homeowners Pay For
  3. The Money DeskBlogTheFinanceBase09 OCT 265 minHow to Read a Stock Chart, Volume and Market-Cap Data
Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You DownFree scan - exact matches
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?Free scan - under a minute

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.