Mentor Graphics’ Displaced Worker Program offered qualified unemployed engineers free, tool-focused electronic-design-automation (EDA) classes during the early-2000s electronics downturn. It was training, not job placement: a March 2003 report said 269 people had been trained and 26 had later found jobs, but it did not establish that the classes caused those hires.
Why Mentor called laid-off engineers back to class
In August 2002, as layoffs spread through electronics and telecommunications, Mentor Graphics began offering unemployed engineers seats in its regular public training courses. The program made use of classroom capacity that might otherwise sit empty as company training budgets and attendance fell. EDN described the initiative in its March 24, 2003 article, “Mentor calls jobless EEs back to class.”
The offer was unusual because Mentor contacted displaced engineers with an invitation to learn, not a job offer. The company made free seats available in classes normally purchased by employers; EDN reported typical course prices of $600–$800 per person at the time. Those historical prices do not describe current course costs.
What the program offered—and who could attend
This was professional EDA instruction, not general education. Courses covered programmable-logic design, printed-circuit-board (PCB) design, and integrated-circuit design and verification, including work with Mentor tools such as Expedition PCB and Board Station. The aim was to give experienced engineers practical familiarity with commercial design workflows.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
#1 Best Overall
EDN reported that applicants generally needed a BSEE, MSEE, or equivalent background, with additional prerequisites depending on the course. Applicants did not have to be existing Mentor customers or users. A free seat was not automatic: availability depended on open places in the relevant class, and the program had a waiting list.
Classes were held at Mentor training locations in North America. The 2003 report described a typical schedule of 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., five days a week, with courses generally available year-round. It named locations including Austin, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Minneapolis, Portland, and San Jose. These are historical program details, not a statement about current locations, schedules, or policies.
What EDN reported about participation and jobs
The figures below were attributed to Mentor in EDN’s March 2003 report. They describe the program at that time, not a final tally.
| Measure | Reported figure | What it tells us |
|---|---|---|
| Applications since launch | 711 | Interest exceeded the number of seats available. |
| Engineers trained | 269 | Participants who had received training by publication. |
| Applicants waiting | 268 | People still waiting for a place at that point. |
| Participants reported to have found jobs | 26 | A reported employment outcome, not an independently audited placement result. |
Dividing 26 reported hires by 269 trained participants gives about 9.7%. That is only a descriptive comparison of two figures in the article, not a verified placement rate: the report does not establish that the 26 hires came from the same fully tracked group of 269, or that the training caused anyone to be hired.
Two engineers, two routes back to work
Bill Bohan
Bill Bohan, a Dallas design engineer laid off by Metro Optix, took Mentor training to add EDA-tool experience to his résumé. He later obtained contract engineering work with Vertex RSI. EDN reported that Mentor qualification strengthened his résumé even though his new employer used a competitor’s tools. His experience illustrates how vendor-specific training may signal familiarity with a commercial design environment, but one case cannot establish a general hiring rule.
William Reyes
William Reyes, an analog designer and contractor in Tucson, lost work after a large Raytheon-related layoff. After training, he worked on engine-controller design for a Honeywell division. Reyes stressed the value of being able to get up to speed quickly as a contractor, while acknowledging that he could not prove the course was decisive in his hiring.
Why tool-specific training could matter
EDA training can add value in more than one way. Design concepts and practices—such as schematic capture, PCB layout, verification, and debugging—can carry across toolchains. Vendor-specific knowledge, including interfaces, commands, file formats, and workflows, is less portable. Even when a prospective employer uses a different product, familiarity with one commercial environment may suggest that an engineer can learn another quickly; it does not make the tools interchangeable.
- Practical exposure: Training lets an engineer work through a design flow rather than simply list an unfamiliar product on a résumé.
- Credential signal: A completed course can document exposure, but it does not replace design experience or evidence of project results.
- Market fit: Specialized training is most relevant when employers in the engineer’s target market use that tool or workflow.
Mentor’s business rationale—and the program’s limits
The initiative served participants, but it also made business sense for Mentor. The company could fill seats that might otherwise go unused, help customers find engineers already familiar with its tools, and build goodwill among engineers who might later influence software choices at new employers. EDN also reported that Mentor supported a similar initiative in Europe.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesThat combination of public benefit and commercial interest is central to understanding the program. Free access lowered one barrier to training, while Mentor gained visibility and the possibility of future users and advocates. The model still had constraints: seats were limited, applicants needed suitable qualifications, and in-person classes favored people able to reach a training location and commit to a full workweek.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the employment numbers do—and do not—show
The 26 reported hires are evidence that some participants found work after training. They do not show that the course produced those jobs. EDN did not provide a comparison group, participant-by-participant employment tracking, salaries, job retention, or career progression. Prior experience, networking, location, timing, and changes in the labor market may also have mattered. The report therefore supports a claim about participation and reported outcomes, not a causal verdict on the program’s effectiveness.
What exists today is not the same program
Mentor Graphics is now part of Siemens Digital Industries Software. Siemens currently describes EDA learning services through Xcelerator Academy. Its Virtual Engagement Platform offers no-cost on-demand educational material, and Siemens advertises free Level 1 digital-badge exams on its badging and certification page. The company also describes cloud-based labs for tools including Xpedition, HyperLynx, Tessent, and PADS.
These are current learning and practice options, not evidence that Siemens still runs the 2002 displaced-worker initiative. The reviewed Siemens pages do not document a current equivalent. For a job seeker, the practical first step is to check whether target employers ask for Siemens tools; structured training or paid lab access is more useful when it matches a real skills gap than when it is pursued as a generic promise of employment.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
