Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
To verify an investment platform, identify the legal entity behind each claim, define exactly how its returns were calculated, and reconcile those returns and custody claims against records held outside the platform. A dashboard or headline return is not enough: the provider should be able to show what the figure includes, how fees and cash flows were treated, and which independent records support it. This guide is focused on U.S. investment advisers, broker-dealers, custodians, funds, and technology providers; it does not assess a particular platform.
Start by identifying who is making each claim
An “investment platform” may be a consumer-facing brand shared by several legally separate businesses. One entity may provide advice, another execute trades, another hold assets, and a fund or issuer may own the investment product. A technology company may supply the interface without being the adviser or custodian. Verify the entity responsible for each promise rather than assuming the brand name identifies the party accountable for it.
- Write down every relevant legal name. Record the platform operator, investment adviser, broker-dealer, custodian, fund or issuer, and any entity receiving your money. Note which entity claims a particular return, offers advice, executes transactions, or holds assets.
- Check official records for the relevant entity and people. For an investment adviser, use the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) system to find its latest Form ADV. The SEC describes IAPD as a free public source for the most recently filed Form ADV; see its Form ADV and IARD FAQ. For a broker-dealer or registered individual, check the appropriate official federal or state regulator record for that entity or person.
- Read the disclosures for what they cover. Review the adviser’s identity, services, conflicts, disciplinary disclosures, and custody responses. Compare the filed information with the names and descriptions on the platform. If the names do not line up, ask the provider to explain the relationship in writing.
Registration and disclosure are status checks, not quality ratings. They do not establish that a return claim is accurate, that an investment is suitable, or that a provider will perform well. SEC examination questions ask advisers to consider whether their communications are “truthful, representative, complete, and not misleading”; that is a compliance standard, not a consumer guarantee. See the SEC’s adviser compliance questions.
Define what the advertised return actually represents
Before comparing a performance number with another provider’s—or with your own account—get the calculation and its scope in writing. The SEC’s adviser marketing guide discusses conditions for presenting gross and net performance, time periods, related portfolios, extracted performance, hypothetical performance, and predecessor performance. Which requirements apply depends on the communication, audience, and product; the guide is not a substitute for legal advice. Read the SEC’s Investment Adviser Marketing guide.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
#1 Best Overall
- Type of result: Is it actual client-account performance, a model, a backtest, a hypothetical illustration, or a blend? If actual, ask which accounts are included and whether closed or poorly performing accounts were left out.
- Dates and duration: Get the precise start and end dates. Establish whether the figure covers full calendar years or partial periods, and whether the provider has presented the same period consistently.
- Portfolio and method: Ask which strategy and accounts the number represents and whether it is a time-weighted return, an internal rate of return (IRR), or another measure. Find out how deposits, withdrawals, leverage, and fund credit lines were handled.
- Fees and expenses: Determine whether the return is gross or net, and which advisory fees, fund expenses, transaction costs, and other charges were deducted. Ask what fee assumptions would apply to you; a net figure based on a different fee schedule may not reflect your result.
- Benchmark: Identify the benchmark and ask why its strategy, risk, period, and calculation basis are comparable to the portfolio being advertised.
For adviser advertisements, SEC staff says gross and net performance must use the same type of return and methodology over the same period. The staff FAQ also discusses how a private-fund IRR presentation can mislead if gross and net calculations treat subscription facilities differently. The FAQ contains dated staff views—not rule text—including answers dated Jan. 15, 2026, on model fees and Feb. 6, 2024, on gross and net calculation. Consult the SEC’s Marketing Compliance FAQ for the specific discussion.
When two platforms use different periods, return methods, fee assumptions, account populations, or leverage treatment, their headline percentages are not a like-for-like comparison. Ask each provider to recalculate or explain the difference before drawing a conclusion.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
Reconcile performance to records outside the platform
Ask for the calculation schedule and supporting records for the advertised return, then trace the figures to account statements and transaction records from the brokerage firm or custodian. A platform-generated dashboard or statement may be useful for finding discrepancies, but it is not independent corroboration if the same provider created both the claim and the record.
- Request the account-level schedule or calculation files behind the claim, including the population of accounts and dates used.
- Obtain brokerage or custodial statements and transaction histories directly from the firm that holds the account, where possible.
- Compare positions, cash flows, fees, valuations, and period returns against the calculation. Ask the provider to explain any mismatch in writing.
- Find out who prepared the records, who independently holds the assets, and whether the custodian sends statements directly to you.
In a historical speech, SEC staff said examiners would ask advisers to support performance claims with “third-party records – brokerage or custodial records and statements.” The speech described examples of inflated, selective, fabricated, and model-based claims represented as actual; those examples explain why independent corroboration matters, but they are not evidence of current fraud prevalence. See the SEC Division of Investment Management’s Compliance Priorities for Investment Advisers.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11If a provider cannot substantiate a material claim, an independent accounting or performance review may help. Check the reviewer’s qualifications, independence, engagement scope, and report limitations. An audit or verification provides assurance only within its stated scope; it does not guarantee returns, solvency, fraud-free conduct, or future operations.
Verify who holds the assets and how statements arrive
Custody is a separate question from performance. Use an adviser’s Form ADV custody disclosures as a starting point, then establish which legal entity actually holds the assets, how the account is titled, and how you can obtain statements directly from that entity. The SEC’s compliance questions address custody documentation and information handling; see its adviser compliance questions.
Rank #4
Clarify whether money is in an individual brokerage account, a bank deposit, a pooled investment vehicle, or another arrangement. Those structures can involve different legal entities and protections. Compare a statement received from the custodian with the platform’s reporting rather than relying only on a screenshot, balance display, or statement generated by the platform.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Understand the limits of SIPC and standards claims
SIPC is limited protection, not protection from investment losses
The Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) describes its role as helping restore missing customer cash and securities when a SIPC-member brokerage firm fails financially. Its page states a protection limit of $500,000, including a $250,000 limit for cash. SIPC expressly says, “SIPC does not protect against the decline in value of your securities.” It also does not protect against worthless securities or losses from bad investment advice. These are the limits stated on SIPC’s What SIPC Protects page; confirm current details and whether the actual broker-dealer, account, and assets qualify. Do not treat SIPC as investment insurance or a guarantee of returns.
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
GIPS is a standards framework, not a stamp of approval
If a provider claims to follow the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS), ask which firm, strategy composite or product, and periods the claim covers, and what verification—if any—was performed. GIPS publishes requirements for firms, asset owners, verifiers, and fiduciary management providers. A logo or bare statement does not identify the accounts or periods covered. Review the provider’s supporting documents alongside the official GIPS Standards resources.
Likewise, an adviser’s advertisement should not imply that the SEC approved or reviewed its performance calculations or presentation; the SEC’s marketing guide addresses that prohibition.
Use the same evidence when comparing platforms
Do not rank providers by headline returns alone. Put the claims on a common basis and record what evidence supports each one.
| Comparison question | What to line up |
|---|---|
| What does the return represent? | Actual, model, backtested, hypothetical, or blended; the strategy, account set, and dates. |
| How was it calculated? | Gross or net treatment, fee assumptions, return method, cash flows, leverage, credit facilities, and comparable benchmark. |
| Can the number be corroborated? | Account-level calculations reconciled to statements and transaction records from an independent brokerage firm or custodian; note the scope of any review. |
| Who is responsible? | The legal entity making the claim, its role and relevant regulatory status, plus the entities executing trades and holding assets. |
| What could affect your account? | Disclosed conflicts and disciplinary information, statement delivery, and the exact conditions and limits of any protection claim. |
When a provider will not identify the responsible entity, define a performance figure, or show records that support it, treat the claim as unverified—not as proof of wrongdoing, but not as evidence on which to rely.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
