Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Liverpool recorded the Premier League’s highest known transfer-fee spend in the 2025/26 season, at €476.4 million. Aston Villa was lowest, at €75.0 million. These are TransferNews’ season-wide recorded known fees—not audited totals of every club’s transfer costs or cash outlay.
Premier League clubs’ known transfer spending in 2025/26
The table ranks all 20 clubs by TransferNews’ recorded known fees for the 2025/26 season. Amounts are in euros. “Net balance” is known income minus known spending, so a positive figure indicates a surplus on those recorded fees.
| Rank | Club | Known spend | Known income | Net balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liverpool | €476.4m | €219.0m | −€257.4m |
| 2 | Chelsea | €337.0m | €331.7m | −€5.4m |
| 3 | Manchester City | €301.9m | €107.3m | −€194.6m |
| 4 | Arsenal | €287.9m | €13.3m | −€274.6m |
| 5 | Newcastle United | €274.3m | €176.0m | −€98.3m |
| 6 | Tottenham Hotspur | €268.4m | €81.5m | −€186.9m |
| 7 | Manchester United | €250.7m | €74.2m | −€176.5m |
| 8 | Nottingham Forest | €234.6m | €105.4m | −€129.2m |
| 9 | Sunderland | €212.0m | €52.0m | −€160.0m |
| 10 | AFC Bournemouth | €180.1m | €307.4m | +€127.3m |
| 11 | West Ham United | €177.1m | €145.5m | −€31.6m |
| 12 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | €148.1m | €230.2m | +€82.1m |
| 13 | Crystal Palace | €145.0m | €97.2m | −€47.9m |
| 14 | Burnley | €130.7m | €31.6m | −€99.1m |
| 15 | Everton | €129.8m | €12.6m | −€117.2m |
| 16 | Leeds United | €113.7m | €9.0m | −€104.7m |
| 17 | Brentford | €104.6m | €154.3m | +€49.8m |
| 18 | Brighton & Hove Albion | €82.0m | €146.2m | +€64.2m |
| 19 | Fulham | €75.7m | €19.3m | −€56.4m |
| 20 | Aston Villa | €75.0m | €57.2m | −€17.9m |
Source: TransferNews’ published 2025/26 season table, using its fees-v3-canonical-eur methodology. Figures are rounded as published.
What the numbers say—and what they do not
TransferNews reports €4.0 billion in known Premier League spending and €2.4 billion in known income across 803 recorded transfer movements for 2025/26. Its reported fee coverage is 34%. Transfers marked confirmed or completed are included in ranked values, but undisclosed fees are not estimated; fees without a sourced canonical euro value are also excluded from euro totals.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →#1 Best Overall
That means the table is a comparison of recorded known fees, not a complete accounting of each club’s transfer activity. It should not be read as audited or final all-in cash outlay. The source keeps the figures in euros; converting them to pounds would require an exchange-rate choice and could make comparisons with sterling lists misleading.
Gross spend, income and net balance are different measures
- Known spend is the recorded fee total for incoming transfers covered by the source.
- Known income is the recorded fee total for outgoing transfers covered by the source.
- Net balance here means known income minus known spending. It is not gross spending, total transfer cost, or a club’s overall cash position.
For example, Chelsea’s known income of €331.7 million nearly matched its €337.0 million known spend, leaving a reported net balance of −€5.4 million. Bournemouth, Wolves, Brentford and Brighton had positive known net balances in this table.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
Why published totals differ by transfer window
A full-season table and a summer- or January-window tracker answer different questions. Even two estimates for the same window can disagree because providers may count deals or fees differently, and may convert currencies using different rates. The available summer reports illustrate the scale of that variation:
| Summer 2025 measure | Reported total or examples | Source and scope |
|---|---|---|
| Collective Premier League spending | £3.17 billion | Sporting News’ summer report |
| Selected club totals | Liverpool £446.5m; Chelsea £276m; Arsenal £263m; Brighton £12m | Sporting News’ summer report |
| Selected club totals | Liverpool £415m; Chelsea £282.1m; Arsenal £255m; Nottingham Forest £205m | Sports Illustrated’s September 2 summer tracker, attributed to FootballTransfers; fees converted at prevailing rates |
Nottingham Forest’s summer figure, for example, is £205 million in the Sports Illustrated tracker versus £95.1 million in the Sporting News list. These provider estimates should not be averaged or combined: the cited pages do not provide enough shared methodological detail to reconcile them. The summer estimates are not directly comparable with TransferNews’ season-wide euro table.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallJanuary 2026 was a separate window snapshot
Sports Illustrated’s January tracker, attributed to FootballTransfers and last updated February 3, 2026, reports Manchester City at £84 million and Crystal Palace at £83 million, followed by Tottenham at £47.8 million and West Ham at £47 million. The tracker says fees are converted at prevailing rates.
| January 2026 spend | Clubs |
|---|---|
| £84m | Manchester City |
| £83m | Crystal Palace |
| £47.8m | Tottenham Hotspur |
| £47m | West Ham United |
| £36.5m | AFC Bournemouth |
| £28.7m | Aston Villa |
| £27m | Fulham |
| £23.6m | Sunderland |
| £8.5m | Brentford |
| £7m | Wolverhampton Wanderers |
| £2.1m | Nottingham Forest |
| £1.8m | Brighton & Hove Albion |
| £0 | Arsenal, Burnley, Chelsea, Everton, Liverpool, Leeds United, Newcastle United and Manchester United |
A £0 in that tracker is its reported figure for that window, not proof that a club had no transfer activity or no undisclosed deal. Separately, PSRwatch notes that its season pages do not provide per-row transfer dates, so those season totals cannot be split into summer and January using that source.
Rank #4
Transfer fees are not every squad-related cost
Transfer-fee tables do not capture every cost associated with acquiring players. The FA’s 2025/26 reporting on payments to FA-registered football agents covers the period February 4, 2025 to February 2, 2026 for men’s leagues. The FA says those payments may relate to transactions entered before the reporting period, and club payment totals do not necessarily correspond directly to the listed transactions. Agent payments are therefore a separate measure and should not be added to this transfer-fee table using the cited data.
FIFA reported that English clubs in men’s professional football spent USD 3.82 billion on incoming international transfers in 2025. That is an association-wide statistic, not a Premier League-only total for the 2025/26 season, so it provides broader context rather than a direct comparison with these club figures.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Sources
- TransferNews: 2025/26 season table and fee methodology
- Premier League: transfer activity and summer announcements
- Sporting News: summer 2025 spending report
- Sports Illustrated: summer tracker and January 2026 tracker
- PSRwatch: season totals and transfer-date limitations
- The FA: football agent payments reporting
- FIFA: international transfer spending figures
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
