Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
A simple moving average (SMA) gives every value in its window the same weight. An exponential moving average (EMA) gives recent values more weight and carries older information forward with steadily shrinking influence. With the same period length, the EMA reacts faster to new prices, which makes it more responsive but also more sensitive to short-term noise. Both are lagging summaries of past data, not forecasts.
What “moving average” means here
“Moving average” is an umbrella term for any average recalculated as new data arrives. In charting and personal-finance education, it usually refers to the simple moving average, and the EMA is one of its variants. This article uses the common meaning: SMA is the baseline, and EMA is the alternative that changes how past data is weighted.
How a simple moving average works
An SMA adds up the values in the most recent N observations and divides by N. CME Group’s educational material on moving averages illustrates this with closing prices, and MetaTrader’s help documentation gives the same general arithmetic.
- Every value inside the window carries equal weight. A value from yesterday counts the same as one from N−1 periods ago.
- When a new observation arrives, the oldest one leaves the window entirely. That removal is abrupt.
- Because the window is finite, an SMA needs at least N observations before it has a full reading.
How an exponential moving average works
An EMA does not average a fixed window. Instead, each new value is blended with the previous EMA. A common recurrence is:
#1 Best Overall
- Language: english
- Book - trading: technical analysis masterclass: master the financial markets
- It is made up of premium quality material.
EMA today = (current value × α) + (previous EMA × (1 − α))
A widely used smoothing multiplier is α = 2 / (N + 1), where N is the selected period. CME’s 14-period illustration uses α = 2/15, about 0.133. Some platforms or texts use different conventions, so check a chart’s documentation before comparing numbers across tools.
Rank #2
- Used Book in Good Condition
Because yesterday’s EMA already contains earlier values, older observations never disappear in one step. Each step back multiplies their influence by (1 − α). With α near 0.133, a value’s influence shrinks noticeably within a few periods and becomes small over time, but it is never cut to zero the way an SMA window cuts it off. TradingView’s moving average education makes the same point about older data fading rather than dropping out.
The starting value (seed)
The first EMA needs a starting point. Common choices are the prior close or the prior SMA. CME notes that this seed affects early readings. Its influence fades as new data accumulates, but a chart’s first few EMA values should be read with that in mind.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →A worked example
CME Group’s illustration uses a 14-period EMA. You can follow the same steps with its printed inputs:
- Set the period N = 14, so α = 2 / (14 + 1) ≈ 0.133.
- Use the seed value (prior EMA or SMA) of $46.60.
- Take the current close of $46.75.
- Multiply the current close by α: $46.75 × 0.133 ≈ $6.22.
- Multiply the seed by (1 − α): $46.60 × 0.867 ≈ $40.40.
- Add the two: about $46.62. CME’s published illustration rounds to about $46.63; the gap comes from rounding in the printed inputs and does not change the conclusion.
This is an arithmetic illustration from CME Group, not a current market quote, and it is not evidence of how any security performed.
Rank #4
- Charting and Technical Analysis
- Stock Market Trading
- Stock Market Anaylsis
- Technical Analysis for Stocks
- investing
SMA and EMA side by side
| Feature | Simple moving average (SMA) | Exponential moving average (EMA) |
|---|---|---|
| Calculation basis | Average of the last N values | Recursive: blends the current value with the previous EMA |
| Weighting | Equal for every value in the window | Declining with age; the most recent value has the most weight |
| Treatment of old data | Removed abruptly when it leaves the window | Never removed in one step; influence fades gradually |
| Responsiveness at the same period | Slower; Fidelity describes a longer delay than an EMA of the same period | Faster; Fidelity describes a shorter delay than an SMA of the same period |
| Sensitivity to short-term changes | Lower | Higher; Fidelity calls this a double-edged property |
| Starting requirement | First full reading after N observations | Needs a seed value (prior close or prior SMA), which affects early readings |
| Typical interpretive use | Smoothing and trend direction, possible support or resistance areas | Same interpretive uses, with a quicker reaction |
| Lag | Present; both types lag the underlying data | Present but shorter than an SMA of the same period |
Responsiveness versus noise
The EMA’s faster response is the reason it exists, and it is also its trade-off. A recent spike gets more weight in an EMA, so the line moves further and sooner. That can help a reader see a change in direction earlier, but it can also produce more reversals from brief fluctuations that an SMA would smooth out. Neither behaviour is a sign of skill; both are arithmetic consequences of the weighting rule.
The two can look similar when periods are chosen differently. A shorter SMA can track closer to an EMA’s pace, but that comes with its own smoothing profile, so comparisons should be made with both the period and the weighting stated.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Best Value
- Prentice Hall Press
- Ideal for a bookworm
- It's a great choice for a book person
Choosing between them
There is no universal winner. The useful comparison is which property matters for your use:
- Consider an SMA if you want a steadier line that reacts less to brief moves and you are comfortable with its slower response.
- Consider an EMA if a quicker reaction to recent values matters more to you and you accept that it may change more with short-term noise.
- Compare at equal settings: state the period, weighting method, and seed convention, because the same number can mean different things on different platforms.
- Use either as context, not a verdict. Both lag. A crossover between two averages is a visual signal to examine, not a guarantee of a turning point or a profitable trade.
The same math outside trading
The exponentially weighted approach is also used in statistics. NIST’s engineering guidance on EWMA control charts applies the same recursive weighting to monitor process measurements, where a weighting parameter controls how quickly the chart responds to shifts. That is a related statistical application, not evidence about trading results, but it shows the idea is a general smoothing method rather than a market-specific rule.
The key difference to remember is simple: an SMA asks “what was the average of the last N values,” while an EMA asks “how should I update my running estimate given the newest value, with older values fading gradually.”
Sources: CME Group, “Understanding Moving Averages”; Fidelity, “Exponential Moving Average (EMA)”; MetaTrader 4 Help, “Moving Average – Technical Indicators”; TradingView, “Moving Averages”; NIST, “EWMA Control Charts.”
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
