The U.S. Department of Energy confirmed in October 2025 that it had canceled five Manufacturing and Energy Supply Chains awards worth about $718 million. The grants were intended to help build U.S. battery-materials and advanced-glass manufacturing capacity. DOE said the projects missed milestones and did not meet its economic and energy-policy tests, but it did not identify the milestones in its statement.
Which manufacturing grants did DOE cancel?
The five awards went to four battery-related companies and one advanced-glass manufacturer. The amounts below are full award totals, not necessarily the amount each recipient still expected to receive when the cancellations were announced.
| Recipient | Full award | Planned project | Reported response or funding detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ascend Elements | $316 million | A planned $1 billion facility in Hopkinsville, Kentucky, to make components from recycled electric-vehicle batteries. | POLITICO E&E News reported about $206 million had been disbursed by October 20, 2025, leaving roughly $110 million affected by the cancellation. CEO Linh Austin said the company planned to proceed and replace the unused grant portion with equity, project finance, municipal bonds, and other debt. POLITICO E&E News |
| ICL Specialty Products | $197.3 million | A St. Louis plant designed to produce 30,000 metric tons a year of lithium-iron phosphate powder for batteries. | ICL said in an SEC filing that it was reviewing DOE’s announcement. POLITICO E&E News ICL SEC filing |
| Anovion | $117 million | Synthetic graphite production for lithium-ion battery anodes, including a planned Alabama facility. | The cited contemporaneous report did not state a recipient response or a disbursement amount. POLITICO E&E News |
| American Battery Technology Co. | $57.7 million | A Nevada plant to produce lithium hydroxide for batteries. | The company said it received notice on October 9, 2025, planned to appeal, and intended to continue the project. It reported that about $52 million remained to be disbursed and that it had raised a similar amount in public markets. POLITICO E&E News |
| LuxWall | $31.7 million | An advanced-glass factory at a former coal plant site in Detroit. | LuxWall planned to appeal. The cited report did not state a disbursement amount. POLITICO E&E News |
Why did DOE cancel the awards?
DOE spokesperson Ben Dietderich said the projects “had missed milestones, and it was determined they did not adequately advance the nation’s energy needs, were not economically viable, and would not provide a positive return on investment of taxpayer dollars.” POLITICO E&E News reported that Dietderich did not specify which milestones were missed. Those are DOE’s stated reasons; the cited reporting does not independently verify the agency’s assessment of each project. POLITICO E&E News
Energy Secretary Chris Wright defended the broader review by saying, “If they’re not in the interest of the taxpayers, if they’re not a good expenditure of the money, you always have the ability to cancel these projects.” His comment was reported in the context of the wider review, not as a project-by-project explanation for all five awards. POLITICO E&E News
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →#1 Best Overall
When were the grants canceled, and where did the money come from?
DOE told POLITICO E&E News on October 17, 2025, that it had canceled the five grants during the second week of that month. The report, published October 20, described them as among the first confirmed awards from a circulating list of possible cuts. The grants were authorized under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, enacted in 2021, and most awards were made in 2023 and 2024, according to TechCrunch. POLITICO E&E News TechCrunch
Why the $718 million total is not the unpaid balance
The approximately $718 million figure is the sum of the five awards. It should not be read as the amount of cash that remained unpaid when DOE canceled them. For example, POLITICO E&E News reported that Ascend Elements had already received about $206 million of its $316 million award, while American Battery Technology Co. said roughly $52 million remained under its $57.7 million award. The available recipient disclosures are selective, so they do not establish a total remaining balance across all five grants. POLITICO E&E News
Rank #2
- Patented Rolltop Seamless Fingertips - Provide Ultimate Dexterity And Double Layer Protection.
- Kevlar Reinforcements – Reinforced In Critical Wear Areas For Maximum Durability
- Increase Donning Speed - The Thermoplastic Rubber (Tpr) Cuff Puller Allows The Operator To Get The Glove In The Proper Position Swiftly
- Sweat Management Feature - Terry Cloth Sweat Wipe Conveniently Located On The Back Of The Thumb Allows You To Stay Focused On The Job At Hand With One Wipe Of The Brow
What did the companies say about next steps?
The responses reported at the time differed. Ascend Elements said it would move forward with alternative financing. American Battery Technology Co. and LuxWall planned appeals, while ICL said it was reviewing DOE’s announcement. These were statements made in 2025; the cited sources do not establish the final funding or legal outcome for every award.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How this differs from DOE’s separate $7.56 billion cancellation
The five manufacturing awards are separate from DOE’s October 1, 2025 announcement terminating 321 awards across 223 projects, which the department valued at approximately $7.56 billion. U.S. Department of Energy
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
In July 2026, the Associated Press reported court developments concerning that separate tranche: DOE lawyers acknowledged in court documents that the selection of grants in that group was based solely on the political identity of recipients’ states, and a federal judge ruled the administration acted illegally in canceling that separate set of grants. Those reports do not establish that the court findings or admission concerned the five MESC awards discussed here. Associated Press Associated Press
Quick Recap
Rank #4
- Premium Heavy Equipment Key Set: 55Pcs heavy equipment keys master set fit fit Cat Caterpillar John Deere Komatsu Volvo Bobcat Kubota JCB Case New Holland Hitachi Sany Hyundai Terex Hyster Yanmar Daewoo Takeuchi Ford Kobelco Doosan IHI. Construction ignition keys set for loaders, tractors, dump trucks, backhoes, excavators, bulldozers and more heavy equipment
- High Quality Material: We are committed to providing the highest quality equipment keys that are designed and manufactured to the highest quality standards to ensure reliability and durability. Manufactured from wear-resistant premium materials that are corrosion-resistant, easy to maintain and clean, and precision cut to specification, they are ideal for heavy equipment
- Easy Identification: Our heavy equipment key set includes both paper and electronic versions of the user manual. You can scan the QR code to access detailed information about each piece of equipment, saving you time during critical operations. The adjustable stainless steel key ring allows you to add or remove keys as needed, making it easy to carry. Whether you manage multiple pieces of equipment or work on construction sites, farms, or in any industrial environment, this versatile key set is an indispensable accessory
- Improve Efficiency: A master key set includes 55 keys, allowing you to access the appropriate key for heavy-duty equipment at any time. You no longer need to waste time searching for a single key. By using this indispensable set, you can eliminate downtime caused by lost or malfunctioning keys
- Note: For keys used frequently on equipment, we provide spare keys to ensure uninterrupted operations in case of loss. Some keys do not have specific key markings; you can scan the QR code to obtain detailed information about each equipment key
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
