The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Roelof Botha’s 2025 advice to founders was conditional: if a startup can operate for at least 12 months without new capital, focus on building; if it may need money in about six months, consider fundraising while investors are still active. He also warned that a rapidly rising valuation can make a later reset painful for a company and its team. Botha made those points at TechCrunch Disrupt in 2025, when he was still Sequoia Capital’s steward. Alfred Lin and Pat Grady succeeded him in that role two days later; Botha remained at Sequoia and on portfolio-company boards.
What Botha advised founders about fundraising timing
Botha framed timing around how soon a company would need capital, not around a universal market forecast. In Connie Loizos’s November 2, 2025 TechCrunch account of his Disrupt appearance, he said that a company with at least 12 months before it needs to raise is probably better off building because it may be worth more a year later. “You’re probably better off building because your company will be worth so much more 12 months from now,” he said, as quoted by TechCrunch.
For a startup roughly six months from needing capital, his advice was the reverse: consider raising while money is flowing, since conditions can turn quickly. These were his judgments in 2025, not a claim about fundraising conditions in October 2026 or a rule that applies to every company.
Turn the timing advice into a company-specific decision
Runway is only one part of the choice. A founder weighing whether to raise now or wait can compare:
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →#1 Best Overall
- Cash need and runway: Estimate when the company will need cash under realistic operating assumptions, including a less favorable case.
- Use of proceeds: Identify the milestones the funding would pay for and whether reaching them could strengthen the next financing or the business itself.
- Cost of waiting: Consider whether delaying a raise risks running short of cash, cutting essential work, or negotiating from a weaker position.
- Terms as well as valuation: A headline valuation does not describe the full financing. Compare dilution and the other terms being offered, not just the number attached to the round.
- Available alternatives: Assess whether the company can reach its next milestone without outside capital and what that would require.
Botha’s six- and 12-month markers are prompts for that analysis, not substitutes for it. His reported remarks do not establish a formula for choosing a round date or predict what investors will offer.
Why a sky-high valuation can become a problem
A valuation set in a financing round is not cash in the bank. If a company’s prospects or financing market change, a later round may not support the earlier price. That gap can complicate fundraising and create difficult expectations for founders, employees, and investors who were planning around continued valuation growth.
Rank #2
Botha illustrated the risk with an unnamed Sequoia portfolio company: according to TechCrunch, its valuation rose from $150 million to $6 billion over 12 months in 2021, then fell sharply. The report does not identify the company or give its later valuation, so the example cannot establish how far it fell or what ultimately happened. Botha compared the danger to Icarus: “if you fly too hard, too fast, your wings may melt.”
The point is not that founders should reject a strong valuation. Rather, a financing price should be considered alongside the capital raised, the company’s progress, the expectations built into that price, and the consequences if the next round is lower. Botha’s example shows the difficulty of a sharp reversal; it does not independently prove that high valuations cause companies to fail.
Recommended Free Tools
What Sequoia’s selective approach looked like in 2025
Botha described Sequoia as an early-stage investor that makes relatively few investments and gives those companies substantial attention. TechCrunch reported from his remarks that Sequoia had invested in 20 seed-stage companies in the 12 months before his October 2025 appearance, nine of them at incorporation. Those figures describe the period he discussed, not a current annual investment target.
He also described an unusually consensus-driven partnership process: every investment requires partner agreement, votes carry equal weight, and Monday partner meetings begin with anonymous polling. “No one, not even me, can force an investment through our partnership,” Botha said, as quoted by TechCrunch.
Botha argued that venture capital should not be treated simply as a broad asset class, and that putting more money into the industry does not create more great companies. “Throwing more money into Silicon Valley doesn’t yield more great companies,” he said. These are his views, not independently established findings about venture returns or the performance of Sequoia’s strategy.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Botha’s comments in the context of Sequoia’s leadership change
Botha spoke at TechCrunch Disrupt in San Francisco in October 2025. Axios reported on November 4 that Alfred Lin and Pat Grady became Sequoia stewards, succeeding Botha. Botha remained with the firm and continued serving on portfolio-company boards. His fundraising comments therefore belong to a specific moment in Sequoia’s leadership and should not be read as a current statement from its stewards.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Best Value
For historical context, Sequoia’s 2018 profile said Botha joined the firm in 2003 and quoted his advice to solve a real problem a founder personally understands rather than start a company solely because a market looks attractive. That earlier advice is separate from his 2025 remarks about runway and valuations.
What the reported figures do—and do not—show
TechCrunch also quoted Botha as saying that 50% of seed or venture investments fail to fully recover capital over 20–25 years, and that 3,000 venture firms operate in America. These are figures attributed to Botha in the report; they are not independently verified current industry statistics. They should not be treated as a measured probability for any particular startup or as a current count of U.S. firms.
The evidence supports a clear account of what Botha said and how Sequoia described its own process. It does not establish that Sequoia’s selectivity outperforms other investment approaches, or that a high valuation by itself harms a company.
Quick Recap
Sources
- Connie Loizos, TechCrunch, November 2, 2025: Botha’s comments on fundraising, valuation risk, and Sequoia’s investment process
- TechCrunch podcast page describing the Disrupt interview’s scope
- Axios, November 4, 2025: Sequoia stewardship change
- Sequoia’s 2018 profile of Roelof Botha
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems
