Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Cards Against Humanity did not win a trial judgment against SpaceX. The companies reached a confidential settlement in 2025, after Cards Against Humanity alleged that SpaceX and its contractors used the company’s privately owned parcel in Cameron County, Texas, without permission. SpaceX reportedly removed its equipment, and Cards Against Humanity said it would arrange restoration work.
The settlement ended the dispute before the scheduled jury trial. The public record does not disclose whether SpaceX paid money, how much it paid, or whether it accepted legal responsibility.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The short answer
The headline claim that Cards Against Humanity “forced SpaceX to vacate” is a shorthand for a practical outcome, not a court-ordered eviction. The parties settled before trial, SpaceX reportedly removed equipment from the parcel, and Cards Against Humanity said the land would be restored. There was no public jury verdict, published judgment finding liability, or $15 million damages award.
That distinction matters because Cards Against Humanity originally sought up to $15 million. That figure was a demand in the lawsuit—not money the company was publicly confirmed to have recovered.
#1 Best Overall
- A whole new card game written from scratch for mature kids and immature grown-ups to play together.
- Comes with 600 all-new cards about toilets, butt spaghetti, and Mom's friend Donna.
- Tested with thousands of families over many years. Easy enough for kids, funny enough for you. For 4+ players, ages 8 and up.
- A go-to family card game and game-night gift that's kid-friendly and parent-approved.
- Sorry, not as fun as video games.
What happened, in order
- 2017: Cards Against Humanity raised $15 contributions from approximately 150,000 supporters and acquired land in Cameron County, Texas.
- 2017 onward: The company said the purchase was intended to complicate construction of then-President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall.
- Before September 2024: Cards Against Humanity said SpaceX used the parcel without permission as part of its nearby South Texas operations.
- September 2024: Cards Against Humanity filed suit in Cameron County District Court.
- 2024–2025: The parties conducted discovery and negotiated.
- September 2025: Court records reportedly reflected that the case had settled.
- October 20–21, 2025: The settlement became public. Cards Against Humanity said SpaceX had removed its equipment and that restoration work was planned.
- November 3, 2025: A jury trial had been scheduled to begin, but did not proceed because of the settlement.
Reports on the settlement came from the Associated Press, Ars Technica and TechCrunch.
Why did Cards Against Humanity own border land?
This was not a conventional real-estate investment. In 2017, Cards Against Humanity ran a political campaign tied to opposition to Trump’s proposed border wall. Supporters paid $15 each, and the company said it would use the campaign to acquire land that could make wall construction more difficult or expensive.
Approximately 150,000 people participated, producing roughly $2.25 million in gross contributions based on the reported figures. That calculation does not establish the parcel’s purchase price or show that every dollar went directly toward buying the land; campaign expenses and other costs are not detailed here.
The land was in Cameron County in far South Texas, near the Rio Grande and SpaceX’s Starbase complex. “On the U.S.–Mexico border” is a reasonable shorthand, but the property was not described as land in Mexico, federal border land, or part of SpaceX’s launchpad.
Rank #2
- More Cards Against Humanity comes with 600 expansion cards that instantly double the replayability and girth of your Cards Against Humanity main game.
- If you've never bought an expansion before and you just want more Cards Against Humanity cards, buy this.
- Comes with all the best cards from our original Red Box, Blue Box, and Green Box expansions, plus 50 new ones we've never printed before.
- While this is technically an expansion, you could probably play it by itself. A great gift for anyone who's worn out their main deck. Ages 17+.
- Shiny.
The original campaign is documented in reporting by The Washington Post and TechCrunch.
What did the lawsuit allege?
Cards Against Humanity alleged that SpaceX and contractors entered and altered the parcel without permission. The reported allegations included:
- clearing vegetation;
- placing posts or markers near the boundary;
- spreading gravel or other compacting material;
- parking vehicles;
- storing construction materials;
- bringing in generators and other equipment; and
- changing a natural lot into an apparent worksite.
The company sought damages for restoration, the value of SpaceX’s alleged use of the property, diminished property value, loss of use, reputational or goodwill losses and related damages. The complaint sought up to $15 million, according to reporting by the San Antonio Express-News and The Washington Post.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
These were claims made in litigation. They were not all established by a trial verdict.
Rank #3
- The Nasty Bundle is a collection of six themed packs that's too spicy for most stores. Shuffle these into your deck and make everyone uncomfortable the next time you play.
- Includes the Period Pack, Weed Pack, Ass Pack, Saves America Pack, Picture Card Pack 1, and Picture Card Pack 2.
- This is an expansion, so it requires the Cards Against Humanity main game. Shuffle it into your card game and go. Ages 17+.
- A great value gift set for game nights and bachelorette parties - more themed packs for less than buying them one at a time.
- Also includes ten all-new extra-nasty cards we wrote just for you.
What did SpaceX reportedly acknowledge during discovery?
According to Ars Technica’s account of court documents, SpaceX acknowledged during discovery that it had not asked for or received permission to use the property. The reporting also said the documents described contractors clearing the lot, installing gravel, parking vehicles and storing construction materials there.
That is legally different from saying a jury found SpaceX liable. Discovery is the evidence-gathering phase of a lawsuit. The case settled before the scheduled trial, so no jury publicly resolved the claims.
SpaceX and its lawyers reportedly did not respond to major news organizations’ requests for comment, including the AP’s report.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Why was SpaceX operating nearby?
SpaceX has developed its Starbase facility in Cameron County near Boca Chica. County documents describe road and beach closures associated with SpaceX testing and flight operations, as well as significant investment and infrastructure in the area. The county’s Starbase economic-impact release and a SpaceX-related closure notice provide that broader context.
Rank #4
- That's right. It's tiny. It's Cards Against Humanity. The same card game, now small enough to lose in a couch cushion.
- Measures a minuscule 2.6" x 4.4" x 1.8" and weighs 9.7 oz, with 1.25" x 1.75" cards. The banana picture is to-scale.
- Includes the same 600 cards as the regular game, from the latest edition (2.4). We're not allowed to call this product its real title, 'Tiny Cards Against Humanity.' Oh well.
- A perfect travel card game and stocking-stuffer gift for camping trips, shrink-ray mishaps, or smuggling into North Korea. Best with 4 to 20+ players, ages 17 and up.
- America's #1 goldfish coffin.
Nearby construction explains how the parcel became entangled with a large aerospace operation. It does not, by itself, establish that SpaceX had permission to use Cards Against Humanity’s land.
What happened to the $15 million claim?
The settlement terms are confidential. Public reporting does not establish:
- whether SpaceX paid Cards Against Humanity;
- the amount of any payment;
- whether SpaceX agreed to pay restoration costs;
- whether either party admitted liability; or
- the complete set of settlement obligations.
Accordingly, it would be inaccurate to say that SpaceX paid $15 million. The only verified point is that $15 million was the maximum amount sought in the lawsuit.
What did the original supporters receive?
There was no publicly reported cash payout to the people who contributed $15 in 2017. Instead, Cards Against Humanity offered supporters access to an exclusive Elon Musk-themed mini-pack of cards, according to Texas Public Radio and TechCrunch.
Best Value
- Cards Against Humanity: Canadian Edition is a card game for horrible people. This is the main game for Canada. Buy this first.
- Comes with 500 white cards and 100 black cards for eternal replayability, plus a booklet of sensible game rules and preposterous alternate rules.
- One player asks a question from a black card, and everyone answers with their funniest white card. Best with 4 to 20+ players. For ages 17 and up.
- A funny card game and easy gift for game night, eh. Sorry.
- Includes special Canadian cards so funny you'll forget you live in Canada.
That means the campaign’s financial outcome should not be described as a repayment or a distribution of lawsuit proceeds. The supporters received a promotional product offer rather than a publicly reported share of settlement money.
What “vacate” means here
In ordinary headline language, SpaceX “vacated” the land because it reportedly removed its equipment and left the disputed parcel after settlement discussions. But no public source in the reported coverage establishes that a judge ordered SpaceX off the property or issued an injunction.
The most accurate description is that SpaceX reportedly removed its equipment as part of a confidential settlement that resolved the dispute before trial.
What remains unknown
- The settlement’s financial and nonfinancial terms.
- Whether any money changed hands.
- The precise restoration obligations and who must pay for them.
- Whether restoration has been completed.
- Whether SpaceX made any admission beyond the discovery facts reported by Ars Technica.
- The final condition and future use of the parcel.
Cards Against Humanity said it would work with a local landscaping company to restore the property. That statement does not prove that restoration was completed or that the land fully returned to its earlier ecological condition.
The legal and financial takeaway
This was a private-property dispute wrapped in the theatrical politics and marketing style associated with Cards Against Humanity. The underlying issue was more ordinary: whether a neighboring industrial operation used privately owned land without permission, and what remedy would resolve the alleged harm.
Cards Against Humanity achieved a practical objective—the reported removal of SpaceX equipment and a commitment to restoration—but the public record does not show an adjudicated damages victory. The case ended through settlement, not through a court ruling that SpaceX was liable or an award of the requested $15 million.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →
