Recommended Free Tools
GSA’s March 2025 property list included buildings associated with the Parr-Franconia Warehouse Complex in Springfield, Virginia, but WIRED reported that the CIA-associated building at the site was not itself listed. Inclusion on the list did not mean an immediate sale, and the available sources do not establish whether the listed buildings were later sold, retained, or offered again.
What was on GSA’s March 2025 list?
WIRED reported that the General Services Administration published a list of 443 properties on March 4, 2025, then removed it the following day. More than 120 entries had been scrubbed before the list came down, according to the report. The archived version includes entries identified as “Butler” or “Franconia,” as well as “BUILDING A, 6810” in Springfield. WIRED connected these entries to the Parr-Franconia Warehouse Complex, also known as the GSA Warehouse. WIRED’s account and the archived list document the entries.
The archived list assigns “BUILDING A, 6810” an area of 1,005,602 square feet. WIRED described the site as dating to the early 1950s and said its dominant warehouse had long been used as a government supply depot. The 1,005,602-square-foot figure is for that listed building; the sources do not establish it as the total area of the entire complex.
Was the CIA facility itself on the GSA sale list?
WIRED reported that a U-shaped building at 6801 Springfield Center Drive, situated within the complex, has long been associated with the CIA. The report said the CIA-associated building itself did not appear on GSA’s list; the listed properties were buildings around it. Earlier reporting described the CIA-associated building as privately held.
#1 Best Overall
The historical account of the CIA connection comes through prior journalism and a book, not confirmation of current operations. WIRED traced the public account to 2012 reporting by the Washington Business Journal and quoted Fallout: The True Story of the CIA’s Secret War on Nuclear Trafficking, a 2011 book by Catherine Collins and Douglas Frantz. The quoted passage described a secret Springfield facility where CIA technical officers trained in covert entry and technical operations. WIRED cautioned that whether the facility is still used for those purposes is unknown. The CIA declined comment to WIRED, and GSA did not respond to the publication’s request for comment.
Did GSA actually sell the Springfield warehouse?
The sources available here do not establish that the listed buildings were later sold, republished, withdrawn, or retained. GSA said the original list’s inclusion of a building did not mean it would be for sale immediately. The agency told WIRED: “We anticipate the list will be republished in the near future after we evaluate this initial input, and determine how we can make it easier for stakeholders to understand the nuances of the assets listed.” That statement described an intention at the time; it does not confirm that the list was republished or that a sale took place.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
GSA’s current real-property disposition page says surplus property may be sold at public sale or auction, sold through negotiation, or transferred to government agencies, and directs prospective buyers to realestatesales.gov. The page does not say that the Springfield complex is currently for sale. GSA’s sales-office contact page lists a Springfield/Franconia Warehouse Center at 6808 Loisdale Road, Building A. That is a contact-office listing, not evidence of a sale offering for the warehouse complex or the CIA-associated building.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why did the list draw local concern?
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors chair Jeff McKay, whom WIRED described as a longtime advocate for redevelopment of the complex, argued that the facility had constrained redevelopment planning. WIRED also reported McKay’s view that the proposed relocation of an FBI headquarters to Springfield had foundered in part because of the CIA presence, citing logistical concerns he described. These are McKay’s claims as reported by WIRED, not evidence of a settled position shared by every government agency.
McKay criticized the list’s preparation, saying: “Obviously, someone did no research about the long and well-documented history of this property.” The dispute therefore involved more than a potential property transaction: it raised questions about how the surrounding buildings might be sold or redeveloped near a site publicly associated with intelligence activity.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
