PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchRepresentative Mark DeSaulnier has publicly argued that corporate priorities can put workers and nearby communities at risk. In a September 2022 House hearing, he connected fatal refinery incidents in his district to what he described as companies placing investor returns ahead of the workforce and community. The phrase “When profits matter more than safety, everyone loses” captures that theme, but it has not been verified as DeSaulnier’s exact wording.
What did Mark DeSaulnier say about profits and safety?
At a September 15, 2022 House hearing on fossil fuel industry profits, DeSaulnier said his district included five refineries. He recounted a constituent’s death after a refinery explosion and a separate incident in which four constituents died. He also said a report following a facility shutdown described the company’s culture as responsible. Summing up his view, he said: “It is, in my view, the priority of return on investment to investors rather than the community and their work force.” The official hearing transcript records these remarks; they are DeSaulnier’s account and interpretation, not an independent investigation of the incidents.
DeSaulnier also recalled authoring an industrial safety ordinance while serving on the county board. He said the county then went 22 years without another fatality or emergency-room incident. That is his stated recollection and suggested connection; the hearing transcript does not independently evaluate the ordinance’s effect.
A separate statement about the workforce
In a September 5, 2018 press release about a labor and wages initiative involving DeSaulnier, Debbie Dingell, Mark Pocan, and Donald Norcross, DeSaulnier said: “Today’s culture of unchecked corporate power and maximizing profits has come at the expense of America’s workforce.” The release documents that separate statement; it does not establish the wording in this article’s headline as a quotation.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →#1 Best Overall
How can business incentives affect worker safety?
Companies face pressure to meet production goals, control costs, and deliver returns. Those pressures do not automatically lead to unsafe work: investment decisions and production targets operate alongside safety standards, hazard reporting, training, maintenance, inspections, and enforcement. The practical concern is whether an organization’s targets or management culture discourage workers from reporting hazards, delay corrective work, or reward output without giving safety equal weight.
That is a policy question, not proof of a universal trade-off between profit and safety. An archived Department of Labor memo explicitly framed the choice as false: its heading was “Looking to the Future: Rejecting the False Choice of Profits or Safety.” The memo presents safety protections and viable operations as compatible goals, while describing how enforcement can address dangerous practices.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
What historical evidence does the Department of Labor cite?
The Department of Labor’s archived exit memo offers historical context, not a current snapshot of workplace risk. It says 14,000 workers were killed on the job annually before OSHA was created in 1971—about 38 per day. By the memo’s reference period, workplace deaths had fallen by nearly two-thirds while the national workforce was almost twice as large as before OSHA. Those are historical comparisons as presented in the memo, not current fatality rates.
Mining enforcement and Upper Big Branch
The memo says the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) found that Massey Energy had promoted and enforced a workplace culture valuing production and profit over safety before the Upper Big Branch disaster, in which 29 miners died. It also reports that MSHA’s Pattern of Violations reforms were associated with a 40 percent reduction in violations among the 200 mines cited for the most serious violations between 2010 and 2015. That figure applies to this defined group and period; it is not a general measure of the effect of enforcement across all industries.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
The memo’s account supports the case for oversight as one part of prevention. It does not, by itself, establish which combination of rules, inspections, penalties, worker participation, or company practices will work best in every industry.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How should readers assess claims about corporate safety?
DeSaulnier’s hearing remarks are useful evidence of his position and his account of local events. The Department of Labor memo supplies a distinct federal account of historical mining enforcement. Neither should be treated as a controlled comparison proving that a particular safety policy will always prevent incidents or that profit-seeking inevitably produces unsafe conditions.
Rank #4
When weighing a company’s safety record or a proposed policy, consider four questions:
- Prevention rules: What standards and local safety requirements apply, and do they address the hazards workers actually face?
- Inspection and enforcement: How are violations identified, corrected, and penalized? The mining result cited above concerns a specific reform and period.
- Worker and community input: Can workers report hazards and participate in addressing them? Are nearby communities informed about serious risks?
- Management incentives: Do production targets and investment decisions leave time and resources for maintenance, training, and hazard correction?
These are analytical questions rather than a ranking of proven interventions. A 2005 Congressional Record debate shows that OSHA enforcement design and workplace protections have been politically contested; it is historical context, not a guide to current law or agency practice. The Congressional Record documents positions in that debate.
Quick Recap
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
