BeyondTrust announced in May 2012 that it had acquired privately held eEye Digital Security. The companies did not disclose the financial terms. The strategic aim was to combine eEye’s vulnerability-management tools with BeyondTrust’s privileged-access capabilities, giving security teams more context for deciding which risks to fix first. eEye co-founder Marc Maiffret became BeyondTrust’s chief technology officer.
When did BeyondTrust acquire eEye?
BeyondTrust announced the acquisition in May 2012. CSO/Network World and SecurityWeek reported it on May 9; The Register and Dark Reading published follow-up coverage on May 11. The companies were privately held, and contemporary reports said the purchase price was not disclosed.
Why did BeyondTrust buy eEye?
The companies offered complementary security capabilities. eEye focused on finding vulnerabilities and helping organizations address them; BeyondTrust supplied privileged identity and access management through its PowerBroker product family. Combining those capabilities was intended to help customers assess vulnerabilities alongside information about privileged users, sensitive data, and how data moved through their systems.
In practical terms, the proposed workflow was to discover systems and configurations, identify weaknesses, factor in privilege and data context, then prioritize patching or other remediation. That approach was presented as a way to make security and compliance decisions more informed—not simply to produce a longer list of vulnerabilities.
#1 Best Overall
BeyondTrust CEO John Mutch described the intended benefits as context-aware protection of systems, people, and data; integrated protection against internal and external threats; and logging and reporting for security and compliance audits. The company also positioned the combination for mobile, virtualized, and cloud environments, as well as highly regulated sectors such as financial services, defense, and aerospace.
Which products were involved?
| Product or capability | Company and role in the deal |
|---|---|
| PowerBroker | BeyondTrust’s privileged identity and access-management product family. Its role was to contribute information about privileged access and related security context. |
| Retina CS Vulnerability Management and Analytics | eEye’s vulnerability-management and analytics capability, which the companies planned to integrate with PowerBroker. |
| Blink | An eEye security product brand. Contemporary reporting said it would continue to be supported and developed during the integration period. |
| Retina CS Threat Management / Retina Insight | Later 2012 industry coverage described analytics, intelligence, and reporting features for vulnerability-management programs, including mobile, cloud, and virtualization contexts. |
eEye’s broader capabilities included patch remediation, malware defense, and configuration compliance. Contemporary coverage described the intended combined offering as a more unified operational view for deciding what to address first and next. It did not establish a current, apples-to-apples comparison with competing platforms.
What happened to eEye’s leadership?
Marc Maiffret, eEye’s co-founder, was to become BeyondTrust’s CTO, and eEye senior leaders were also expected to join BeyondTrust. Maiffret emphasized the business-specific nature of security decisions: organizations needed appropriate privilege management, configuration controls, and timely patch deployment.
What size was the combined business expected to be?
Infosecurity Magazine reported in 2012 that the combined business was expected to have about 250 employees and projected first-year turnover of $70 million. These were contemporaneous expectations, not audited results or current company figures.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteRank #3
SecurityWeek reported in 2012 that eEye had more than 10,000 customers worldwide, including the U.S. Department of Defense. That customer count was attributed to the company in the article; it should be read as a reported figure at the time, not a present-day total.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Were the financial terms disclosed?
No. Contemporary reports said the financial terms were not disclosed. Because both businesses were privately held, the announcement and coverage do not provide a public purchase price or valuation to compare.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
