Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Yes. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a federal lawsuit against Apple, Inc. on September 30, 2025, alleging that the company failed to accommodate a Jewish employee’s Sabbath observance, discriminated against him because of his religion, and retaliated against him before terminating him. The case, EEOC v. Apple, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-01637, is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The allegations have not been decided by a court.
The public case concerns one employee at Apple’s Reston, Virginia, retail store—not a judicial finding that Apple has a company-wide policy of religious discrimination.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
$300 Apple Gift Card—Email Delivery | $300.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
$100 Apple Gift Card—Email Delivery | $100.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
$25 Apple Gift Card—Email Delivery | $25.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
Apple Physical Gift Card | $100.00 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Visa Virtual eGift Card | $206.95 | Buy on Amazon |
What the EEOC alleges happened
According to the EEOC’s complaint announcement, the employee had worked for Apple for 16 years as an Apple “genius” and had consistently received positive performance reviews. He converted to Judaism in or around August 2023 and asked not to be scheduled on Fridays and Saturdays so he could observe the Jewish Sabbath.
The agency alleges that a new store manager rejected the request, citing an Apple scheduling policy that supposedly prevented the employee from having both days off. The EEOC says the employee then worked during the Sabbath because he feared losing his job.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →#1 Best Overall
- For all things Apple - products, accessories, apps, games, music, movies, TV shows, iCloud+, and more.
- Perfect for App Store purchases and subscriptions—get apps, games, music, movies, TV shows, and more.
- The perfect gift to say happy birthday, thank you, congratulations, and more.
- Available in $15 - 500, Card delivered via email or SMS
- Use it for purchases at any Apple Store location, on the Apple Store app, apple.com, the App Store, iTunes, Apple Music, Apple TV, Apple News+, Apple Books, Apple Arcade, iCloud+, Fitness+, Apple One, and other Apple properties in US only
The agency also alleges that Apple began disciplining him for alleged grooming-policy violations around the time he requested the religious accommodation. It says Apple terminated him in January 2024, shortly after he reminded a supervisor about an upcoming religious day off. Apple reportedly gave a grooming-policy violation as the stated reason for termination, but the EEOC claims that explanation was false or pretextual.
The EEOC says it attempted to resolve the matter through its pre-litigation conciliation process before filing suit. Conciliation ending without an agreement does not establish that the agency proved its claims; it means the dispute was not resolved before litigation.
Verified case details
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Defendant | Apple, Inc. |
| Plaintiff | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Case | EEOC v. Apple, Inc. |
| Case number | 1:25-cv-01637 |
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Filing date | September 30, 2025 |
| Store | Apple retail store in Reston, Virginia |
| Employee’s role | Apple “genius,” according to the EEOC |
| Accommodation requested | No work on Fridays and Saturdays for Sabbath observance |
| Alleged termination | January 2024 |
| Claims | Failure to accommodate, religious discrimination and retaliation under Title VII |
| Latest verified outcome | No settlement, judgment or dismissal was verified in the official sources reviewed through August 18, 2026 |
Source: EEOC announcement of the lawsuit.
What Title VII requires
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits covered employers from discriminating because of religion in hiring, firing, scheduling, job assignments, pay, promotion, training and other terms or conditions of employment. It generally requires an employer to reasonably accommodate a sincerely held religious belief or practice unless doing so would impose an undue hardship.
Rank #2
- For all things Apple - products, accessories, apps, games, music, movies, TV shows, iCloud+, and more.
- Perfect for App Store purchases and subscriptions—get apps, games, music, movies, TV shows, and more.
- The perfect gift to say happy birthday, thank you, congratulations, and more.
- Available in $15 - 500, Card delivered via email or SMS
- Use it for purchases at any Apple Store location, on the Apple Store app, apple.com, the App Store, iTunes, Apple Music, Apple TV, Apple News+, Apple Books, Apple Arcade, iCloud+, Fitness+, Apple One, and other Apple properties in US only
The law protects sincerely held religious, ethical or moral beliefs; an employee does not have to belong to a formally organized religion. A request also does not have to use legal terminology to receive protection.
Title VII separately prohibits retaliation against an employee who opposes religious discrimination, requests an accommodation or participates in a related complaint process. Thus, a retaliation claim can succeed even if a court does not ultimately find that the underlying accommodation request was unlawfully denied.
See the EEOC’s explanation of the law at eeoc.gov/religious-discrimination.
Rank #3
- For all things Apple - products, accessories, apps, games, music, movies, TV shows, iCloud+, and more.
- Perfect for App Store purchases and subscriptions—get apps, games, music, movies, TV shows, and more.
- The perfect gift to say happy birthday, thank you, congratulations, and more.
- Available in $15 - 500, Card delivered via email or SMS
- Use it for purchases at any Apple Store location, on the Apple Store app, apple.com, the App Store, iTunes, Apple Music, Apple TV, Apple News+, Apple Books, Apple Arcade, iCloud+, Fitness+, Apple One, and other Apple properties in US only
How the undue-hardship test applies
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. DeJoy rejected the idea that an employer can prove undue hardship merely by showing more than a trivial or minimal cost. The employer must show a substantial burden in the overall context of its business, considering the particular accommodation and its practical effects in light of the employer’s size, operations and costs.
The EEOC identifies considerations that can be relevant, including:
- Financial and administrative cost
- Workplace safety
- Reduced efficiency or operational disruption
- Effects on coworkers’ rights and working conditions
- Whether coworkers would have to perform more burdensome or hazardous work
Flexible scheduling, voluntary shift swaps and substitutions, leave, and reassignment can be possible accommodations. An employee is not automatically entitled to the exact schedule requested if another reasonable arrangement would address the religious practice. Conversely, an employer cannot simply invoke a scheduling rule without examining alternatives and the actual operational burden.
Rank #4
- For all things Apple - products, accessories, apps, games, music, movies, TV shows, iCloud+, and more.
- Perfect for App Store purchases and subscriptions—get apps, games, music, movies, TV shows, and more.
- The perfect gift to say happy birthday, thank you, congratulations, and more.
- Available in $100 and $200, Card delivered via mail.
- Use it for purchases at any Apple Store location, on the Apple Store app, apple.com, the App Store, iTunes, Apple Music, Apple TV, Apple News+, Apple Books, Apple Arcade, iCloud+, Fitness+, Apple One, and other Apple properties in US only
Why the scheduling dispute matters
The central question is not merely whether Apple had a scheduling policy. A court could examine whether the policy was applied inflexibly, whether managers explored shift swaps or different assignments, and whether allowing the requested days off would have created a substantial burden in the Reston store’s circumstances.
The evidence may also address whether Apple considered the request in good faith and whether the employee was treated differently after raising it. The EEOC’s allegations do not establish that Apple was required to grant every Friday-and-Saturday request; they assert that the company failed to meet its accommodation duties under the circumstances.
Why the grooming-policy allegation matters
The grooming issue may bear on both discrimination and retaliation. A neutral grooming rule can be lawful, but its enforcement may create legal exposure if it was selectively applied, imposed after a protected request, or used as a pretext for an adverse action.
Best Value
- Visa Virtual eGift Cards are designed for online use only. Gift Cards are subject to Terms and Conditions: a.co/5bw3qXJ
- When you access your Visa Virtual eGift Card for the first time, you’ll need to register your name, address, phone number, and email address via activationspot.com. These details should also be used as your billing address for online purchases, as many merchants require address verification for purchase authorization.
- This Visa Virtual eGift Card is non-reloadable. No cash or ATM access. Visa Virtual eGift Cards are emailed active.
- Funds do not expire but your Visa Virtual eGift Card has a ‘valid thru’ date (9 years from date of purchase). If funds remain after this date has passed, please call the Toll Free number found on your Visa Virtual eGift Card for a replacement card. A one-time purchase fee applies at the time of checkout.
- This item is not eligible for refund, resale, or return. Available for sale within the United States only. Not available to residents of Puerto Rico, Hawaii, New Mexico, South Dakota, West Virginia and the US Virgin Islands.
The EEOC emphasizes the timing: grooming discipline allegedly began around the accommodation request, and the termination allegedly followed a reminder about an upcoming religious day off. Timing can support an inference of unlawful motive, but timing alone does not prove discrimination or retaliation. Apple’s records, the rule’s wording, how it was enforced against other employees, and communications about the accommodation would all be relevant.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What this lawsuit does—and does not—show about Apple
- It confirms a real federal enforcement action involving one employee and one Reston store.
- It does not establish a company-wide finding or a class action.
- It does not prove that Apple banned Sabbath observance.
- It does not establish that the grooming policy itself was unlawful.
- It does not show that the employee’s allegations have been upheld by a judge or jury.
The public EEOC announcement does not identify the employee, state the amount of damages sought, describe Apple’s formal response, or establish that other Apple workers were affected.
What happens next in a federal case
- Apple responds. The company may file an answer or bring a motion addressing the complaint.
- Discovery begins. The parties may seek schedules, accommodation communications, performance records, grooming-policy documents, comparative enforcement records and termination materials.
- Settlement remains possible. The parties can resolve the case at any stage.
- Pretrial motions or trial. If it is not resolved, the court could decide dispositive motions or send factual disputes to trial.
None of these procedural possibilities predicts the outcome.
Broader EEOC enforcement context
In a May 7, 2026 enforcement summary, the EEOC said that since January 2025 it had filed 16 religious-discrimination lawsuits and recovered more than $63 million through public and private pre-litigation resolutions and litigation settlements. The figures combine different types of enforcement resolutions and reflect the agency’s own accounting. The summary lists the Apple lawsuit among its September 2025 religious-discrimination actions.
Recommended Free Tools
That broader activity places the Apple case within increased EEOC attention to Sabbath, prayer, dress, grooming and other religious-accommodation disputes. It does not mean Apple was part of a coordinated 16-company action, and it does not prove the allegations in this case.
Source: EEOC May 7, 2026 enforcement summary.
What remains unknown
- The employee’s identity
- Apple’s formal answer or other substantive response
- Which alternative schedules or accommodations were considered
- The precise grooming rule and comparative enforcement record
- The amount of damages sought
- Whether the parties have settled or the court has issued a ruling
- Whether other employees have made similar complaints
The Bottom Line
The EEOC’s lawsuit against Apple is genuine, but it remains an unresolved case. The agency alleges that a Reston employee’s Sabbath accommodation request was denied, grooming rules were used improperly, and he was retaliated against before being fired. Whether those allegations amount to Title VII violations will depend on the evidence and the court’s eventual rulings.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
