October DealsAmazon USOctober deal check: compare before you payAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.Check DealsSlow PC?RecommendedPC slow today? Run a repair scan before it gets worseResolve common Windows issues and optimize system performance.Scan NowOctober DealsAmazon USDeal season is back - check today's better picksAmazon US: current deals, useful picks and tech finds.See Picks×
Skip to content
The Finance Base
Catholic Relief Services

Catholic Relief Services Was the Top NGO in U.S. Foreign-Assistance Obligations, Followed by Major Consulting Firms

Catholic Relief Services ranked first among NGOs in U.S. nonmilitary foreign-assistance obligations from FY2013–FY2022, ahead of Chemonics, FHI 360, Development Alternatives and Abt Associates. Here is what the figures measure—and what they do not.

By TheFinanceBase Team 3 min read
Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Catholic Relief Services (CRS) ranked first among nongovernmental organizations in the Congressional Research Service’s table of U.S. nonmilitary foreign-assistance obligations for fiscal years 2013–2022, with $4,637,395,555. The table is broader than a current-year or USAID-only ranking: it covers a decade of obligations recorded in foreignassistance.gov. Chemonics International, FHI 360, Development Alternatives and Abt Associates followed, combining nonprofit and for-profit implementers.

What the ranking actually measures

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) report Foreign Assistance: Where Does the Money Go? labels its measure “Total Obligations, FY2013-FY2022.” An obligation is a legally committed amount, not necessarily money already paid out, a current annual award, or an organization’s total revenue.

Although headlines often call CRS the top “USAID recipient,” the cited table covers U.S. nonmilitary foreign assistance as reported through foreignassistance.gov. It does not establish a standalone current USAID ranking. The period ends in fiscal year 2022, so the figures do not show CRS’s funding position in 2026.

Top organizations in the FY2013–FY2022 table

Rank Organization Organization type reported by CRS Total obligations
1 Catholic Relief Services U.S. nonprofit $4,637,395,555
2 Chemonics International, Inc. U.S. for-profit enterprise $4,536,397,348
3 FHI 360 International nonprofit $3,788,300,843
4 Development Alternatives, Inc. U.S. for-profit enterprise $3,071,449,561
5 Abt Associates, Inc. U.S. for-profit enterprise $2,629,027,445

CRS’s table includes organizations with more than $1 billion in obligations during the period. The figures are not a list of “consulting companies” alone: the group includes a religious nonprofit, an international nonprofit and several U.S. for-profit enterprises. Their common feature is their role as large foreign-assistance recipients or implementers.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Why Catholic Relief Services appears first

CRS’s $4.637 billion total is the largest amount attributed to a named nongovernmental organization in the table. It reflects obligations accumulated over ten fiscal years, rather than one grant or a single USAID account. A decade-long total can include multiple countries, programs and awards whose payment schedules extend beyond the year in which they were obligated.

The name can also cause confusion with the Congressional Research Service, which produced the report. In this context, CRS in the organization column means Catholic Relief Services, the international humanitarian agency.

How the consulting-group comparisons should be read

Chemonics International

Chemonics ranked second with $4,536,397,348 in obligations and is classified by the report as a U.S. for-profit enterprise. Its near-$4.6 billion total is a historical obligation figure, not a statement that all of its business comes from USAID or that the amount was paid as profit.

FHI 360

FHI 360 ranked third at $3,788,300,843. CRS classifies it as an international nonprofit, illustrating why a “top consulting firms” label does not describe every organization in the ranking.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Development Alternatives and Abt Associates

Development Alternatives, Inc. ranked fourth with $3,071,449,561, while Abt Associates, Inc. ranked fifth with $2,629,027,445. CRS classifies both as U.S. for-profit enterprises. The table does not provide a separate breakdown of fees, subcontracting, overhead or net income.

Important limits in the underlying data

  • Obligations are not outlays: the totals represent commitments recorded for FY2013–FY2022, not necessarily cash disbursed during those years.
  • Not a current award list: the report does not establish 2026 funding, active contracts or continued program operations.
  • Not exclusively USAID: the primary table concerns U.S. nonmilitary foreign assistance, even though USAID is a major agency in that system.
  • Unspecified recipients: more than $50 billion over the period was obligated to “redacted” or otherwise unspecified recipients. The report says some or much of that amount may include the named organizations, so the named totals are not a complete accounting of every possible obligation associated with them.
  • Organization categories have limits: foreignassistance.gov did not supply the U.S./international nonprofit distinction; CRS added classifications to align the presentation with government reporting.

What the USAID Food for Peace records show

A separate USAID FY 2019 International Food Assistance Report lists country-level CRS awards under Food for Peace. It records a $6,604,538 Title II total cost for CRS in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and a $9,177,531 total cost for CRS in Madagascar.

Those are program-level figures for a specific historical report. They should not be added to the $4.637 billion decade-wide total or treated as evidence of a current award. “Total cost” in that report is also a different measure from the obligations column in the Congressional Research Service table.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What can—and cannot—be concluded today

The evidence supports a precise historical conclusion: Catholic Relief Services was the top named NGO in U.S. nonmilitary foreign-assistance obligations for FY2013–FY2022, followed closely by Chemonics and then FHI 360, Development Alternatives and Abt Associates. It does not identify the current top USAID recipient, the present status of any contract, or how much each organization has received since FY2022.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.

More from the Money Desk

Recommended PC Tool
Recommended PC Tool
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They SpreadFree repair scan
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?Free driver scan

Two free Windows tools

One Free Minute Could Fix That PC

Before you go - each of these free tools takes about a minute and tackles what quietly slows a Windows PC down.

Special offer. View Outbyte info, uninstall instructions, EULA, and Privacy Policy.