Recommended Free Tools
Compare MidCap Financial Investment Corporation (Nasdaq: MFIC) with other business development companies using the same reporting date and definitions. Start with dividend coverage and NAV trends, then examine credit quality, portfolio construction, leverage and funding, and fees. A headline yield alone cannot show whether a distribution is covered by recurring income or whether the portfolio is preserving shareholder capital.
What MFIC is—and what a comparison can tell you
MFIC is an externally managed, publicly traded business development company (BDC). Its stated objective is current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation. The company focuses on senior debt solutions for middle-market companies; Apollo-affiliated Apollo Investment Management, L.P. is its adviser, and MidCap Financial is the primary source of its senior secured loans. Those are issuer descriptions, not an independent judgment of the adviser or the portfolio.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
A BDC comparison is most useful when it separates the sources of shareholder return: investment income, credit losses and valuation changes, financing and operating costs, and distributions. Similar-looking yields can conceal meaningful differences in those components.
What MFIC’s reported figures show
The figures below come from MFIC’s 2025 annual report and its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. They span different reporting periods and portfolio definitions, so they are reference points—not a like-for-like peer ranking.
#1 Best Overall
| Measure | MFIC-reported figure and period | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| NII and distributions | For the year ended December 31, 2025, net investment income (NII) and total distributions were each $1.52 per share. | That is 1.00x coverage for that annual period; it does not establish future coverage. |
| GAAP net income | $0.68 per share for the year ended December 31, 2025. | MFIC attributed the difference from NII to realized and unrealized losses. NII and GAAP earnings measure different things. |
| NAV per share | $14.18 at December 31, 2025; $13.37 at June 30, 2026. | The reported NAV declined $0.81 per share, or about 5.7%, between those dates. |
| Quarterly income and distributions | For the quarter ended June 30, 2026, total investment income was $68.226 million, NII was $32.769 million, and stockholder distributions totaled $25.536 million. | NII divided by those reported distributions is about 1.28x for that quarter. One quarter does not establish a durable coverage trend. |
| Portfolio size and balance sheet | At June 30, 2026, total assets were $2.861 billion, investments at fair value were approximately $2.770 billion, debt was approximately $1.740 billion, and net assets were approximately $1.101 billion. | Use the same balance-sheet date and comparable leverage definitions when lining up another BDC. |
| Direct-origination portfolio | At December 31, 2025, MFIC reported 99% first-lien debt and 100% floating-rate investments for this portfolio. | These percentages apply to the direct-origination portfolio, not automatically to every investment MFIC held. |
| Credit indicators | At December 31, 2025, non-accrual investments were 2.61% of portfolio fair value; PIK income was 5.6% of total investment income for 2025. | Check each peer’s measurement basis, period, and definition before comparing. |
How to compare dividend coverage
Separate recurring income from the distribution rate
For each BDC, put NII per share beside distributions per share for the same quarter and fiscal year. Calculate coverage as NII divided by distributions, and check several consecutive quarters rather than relying on one favorable period. Identify supplemental or special distributions separately from the recurring rate; otherwise, a one-time payment can make the regular payout look larger or better covered than it is.
MFIC paid $0.38 per share quarterly in 2025. Its board reduced the quarterly rate to $0.31 beginning in 2026, citing declining base rates and other factors. The 2025 annual coverage figure therefore should not be mistaken for a guarantee that the 2026 distribution is covered at the same level. Distribution rates can change, and past NII does not assure future income.
Rank #2
- Comes with secure packaging
- Easy to read text
- It can be a gift option
Do not substitute yield for coverage
Dividend yield is a share-price calculation, not an earnings measure. If you include it, record the share price and declared distribution on a specified date, and state whether you annualized a regular quarterly payment. A yield based on an old rate or a different date is not comparable. The company’s reported figures here do not establish a current MFIC yield.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
How to assess NAV and market valuation
Track NAV per share over time
Compare quarterly NAV per share, and read the explanation for material realized or unrealized gains and losses. NAV captures changes in estimated portfolio values and liabilities; distributions can also reduce NAV. A high payout does not by itself show that capital is being preserved.
Calculate premium or discount on one common date
For each BDC, compare the market price with NAV per share reported for the closest common date:
Premium or discount to NAV = (share price − NAV per share) ÷ NAV per share
Rank #4
A positive result is a premium; a negative result is a discount. This is a market-valuation snapshot, not a standalone measure of portfolio quality. Share prices move daily, while NAV is reported periodically, so record both dates. No current MFIC share price or premium/discount is established by the company figures above.
How to compare credit quality and portfolio construction
Look beyond first-lien exposure
Senior secured and first-lien loans generally have priority over junior claims on a borrower’s assets, but seniority does not eliminate default or recovery risk. Compare first-lien share, floating-rate share, borrower and industry concentrations, and origination mix. Check the denominator: MFIC’s reported 99% first-lien and 100% floating-rate figures are for its direct-origination portfolio at December 31, 2025, not a whole-portfolio statistic.
Best Value
For that same direct-origination portfolio and date, MFIC reported 92% sponsored investments, 94% with financial covenants at cost, $12.8 million average exposure, $50 million median borrower EBITDA, 5.29x weighted-average borrower net leverage, and 2.3x weighted-average interest coverage. Its overall portfolio fair value was $3.17 billion across 247 companies and 46 industries. Do not compare a direct-origination percentage at one BDC with a whole-portfolio percentage at another.
Read non-accruals, PIK, and loss data together
Compare non-accrual investments at both cost and fair value when available. Cost shows the amount initially invested; fair value reflects the company’s current valuation of those investments. Also inspect risk-rating migration, restructurings, and realized losses. PIK (payment-in-kind) interest is added to a loan balance rather than paid in cash at the time it accrues; a higher PIK share can therefore make reported investment income less cash-based. Definitions and treatment vary, so use each filing’s footnotes rather than treating similarly named figures as automatically equivalent.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How leverage and funding affect the comparison
Use the same leverage measure for every BDC—such as debt-to-equity or regulatory asset coverage—and note whether the figure is gross or net of cash. Do not treat total debt divided by net assets as interchangeable with regulatory asset coverage. Review secured and unsecured borrowings, maturities, borrowing costs, and unused commitments as well: leverage can magnify gains and losses, while refinancing needs and higher funding costs can reduce income available for distributions.
MFIC’s June 30, 2026 Form 10-Q reported approximately $1.740 billion of debt and $1.101 billion of net assets. To assess its position against another BDC, take the peer’s balance sheet for the same date or nearest matching reporting date and apply the same stated leverage definition; the dollar totals alone do not establish a relative ranking.
How management fees and governance change shareholder economics
Compare the base management fee rate and its calculation base, the incentive-fee hurdle and catch-up, any fee cap or lookback, waivers, administrative expenses, and affiliate transactions. A headline base-fee percentage is incomplete if the fee base differs or incentive fees operate differently. Incentive structures also affect how adviser compensation responds to income and losses. MFIC is externally managed; the fact of external management alone does not establish whether its fees are high or low relative to peers.
A practical MFIC-versus-peer checklist
- Choose the same reporting period. Use quarterly filings and annual reports covering the same dates; label any unavoidable timing difference.
- Align definitions. Check whether figures cover the whole portfolio or a subset, and whether credit, leverage, and income measures use the same basis.
- Compare income with payouts. Put NII per share and distributions per share side by side over multiple periods, separating recurring and supplemental payments.
- Test NAV and market pricing. Review the NAV trend, realized and unrealized losses, and premium or discount calculated from a share price and NAV dated as closely together as possible.
- Inspect the risk and funding mix. Compare non-accruals, PIK, portfolio concentration, loan seniority, leverage, debt maturities, and borrowing costs.
- Read fee disclosures and footnotes. Include incentive-fee mechanics, waivers, valuation explanations, and any changes that affect reported comparability.
MFIC CEO Tanner Powell wrote in an April 2026 shareholder letter, “We are committed to maintaining a well-covered dividend that reflects the sustainable earnings power of the Company.” That is management’s stated commitment, not an independent assurance of future coverage.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
