Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →The best project management software for consultants depends on how you sell and deliver work. Bonsai is the strongest fit for solo consultants who need proposals, contracts, invoices, and a client portal. Teamwork.com is the best overall choice for client-service teams managing billable work, budgets, retainers, and client access. Scoro is better for finance-led firms, while Productive is particularly relevant when resource planning and project margins drive the buying decision.
ClickUp and Asana are excellent work-management tools, but they are not equally strong as consulting-business systems. The important question is not simply whether software has tasks, deadlines, and Gantt charts. It is whether it connects scope, time, capacity, budgets, client collaboration, invoicing, and profitability.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Quick comparison
| Software | Best for | Starting price signal | Native time tracking | Client access |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teamwork.com | Client-service consulting teams | Free; Basics $9.99/user/month | Yes, on Basics | Strong permissions and collaboration |
| Scoro | Financial control and profitability | $19.90/user/month | Yes | Customer portal available as an add-on |
| Bonsai | Solo consultants and small firms | $9/user/month | Yes, on Basic | Client portal on Essentials |
| ClickUp | Custom workflows at a lower entry price | Free; Unlimited $7/user/month | Yes, on Unlimited | Permissioned guests |
| Asana | Structured workflows and adoption | Free for up to two users; Starter $10.99/user/month | Usually through integrations | Guests and view-only access, plan dependent |
| Productive | Resource planning and project margins | Verify current pricing | Verify plan | Designed for client-service work |
Prices above reflect displayed annual-billing signals in the research snapshot available in August 2026. Vendors can change prices, seat minimums, features, and AI charges, so confirm the official pricing page before buying.
Compare Teamwork plans · See Scoro pricing · See Bonsai pricing · See ClickUp pricing · See Asana pricing
What consultants should expect from project-management software
A consulting engagement usually moves through a commercial chain:
- Lead or proposal
- Scope, estimate, and statement of work
- Project plan and milestones
- Assigned people and capacity
- Logged time and expenses
- Budget or retainer consumption
- Client approvals and communication
- Invoice
- Profitability and post-project review
A general task board handles only part of that chain. A consulting-suitable platform should distinguish billable from non-billable work, show planned versus actual hours, support fixed-fee and hourly engagements, and prevent client users from seeing internal notes, costs, or unrelated projects.
For fixed-fee work, look for an original budget, planned hours or cost, actual hours and cost, variance reporting, milestone billing, and change-order tracking. For hourly work, check whether the system supports different rates by consultant, role, client, or project, along with timesheet approval before invoicing. Retainer work needs recurring budgets, used-and-remaining hours, rollover rules, over-servicing alerts, recurring invoices, and utilization reporting.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute1. Teamwork.com: best overall for client-service consulting teams
Choose Teamwork when delivery economics matter as much as task management. It is the most balanced option in this shortlist for consultancies that need client projects, billable time, budgets, capacity, retainers, invoices, and client permissions in one operating system.
The current plan structure includes a free plan for up to five users and five projects; Basics at $9.99 per user per month billed annually; Accelerate at $24.99; and higher tiers with custom pricing. Basics includes project views, templates, and billable-time tracking. Accelerate adds workload and capacity planning, time budgets, retainers, invoice creation from logged time, and connections such as HubSpot and QuickBooks. Optimize adds quotes, resource scheduling, financial budgets, and profitability insights. See the official plan comparison.
Teamwork is also useful when rates vary. Its documentation describes site-wide, role-based, and project-specific billable rates, including negotiated client rates. That matters when two clients pay different rates for similar work or when a retainer uses a special commercial arrangement.
- Best for: multi-client teams, retainers, billable delivery, and client-facing project collaboration.
- Watch out for: the most valuable financial and forecasting controls are plan-gated, and the platform may be more administration than a solo consultant needs.
Verdict: Start with Teamwork if your central problem is controlling profitable client delivery rather than merely organizing tasks.
2. Scoro: best for end-to-end financial control
Scoro is the strongest candidate when margin, utilization, quoting, and invoicing are the buying priorities. Its consulting offering combines project management with quotes, budgets, time tracking, retainers, resource planning, reporting, invoicing, cost management, and CRM.
Scoro emphasizes quoted-versus-actual hours and costs, project margins, retainer usage, and linking time and costs to invoices. Its displayed annual USD pricing is $19.90 per user per month for Core, $32.90 for Growth, and $49.90 for Performance, with Enterprise custom-priced. Comparison coverage indicates a five-user minimum, which can make the entry cost substantial for a solo consultant or two-person practice. Confirm current requirements at Scoro’s pricing page.
Scoro’s Performance tier adds planner, timesheet, utilization, cost, and profit-forecasting capabilities according to the plan comparison. Accounting connections such as Xero, QuickBooks, and Sage are also relevant, but integration availability can vary by plan and geography.
- Best for: established firms, retainer-heavy businesses, and owners who need quoting-to-invoice continuity and margin reporting.
- Watch out for: minimum seats, breadth, and implementation complexity.
Verdict: Choose Scoro when financial visibility is more important than having the simplest possible project workspace.
Recommended Free Tools
Book a Scoro demo or review plans
3. Bonsai: best for solo consultants and small firms
Bonsai is the most natural fit for an independent consultant who wants client administration and project delivery together. It covers time tracking, tasks, CRM, proposals, contracts, forms, scheduling, invoicing, expenses, payments, and client portals.
Displayed annual pricing is $9 per user per month for Basic, $19 for Essentials, $29 for Premium, and $49 for Elite. Essentials adds invoices and payments, proposals and contracts, scheduling, client portals, expenses, and income tracking. Premium adds workload management, Gantt views, client tasks and messaging, and profit and productivity reports. Elite has a three-user minimum. Review the current Bonsai plans before committing.
Bonsai can remove the need to assemble a proposal tool, e-signature workflow, invoicing system, and client workspace around a separate project board. It should not automatically be treated as a replacement for full accounting software, however; accounting integrations and reporting depth remain important questions for a growing firm.
- Best for: solo consultants and small advisory practices that need proposals, contracts, billing, payments, and client access.
- Watch out for: less depth than a PSA-style platform for complex portfolio governance, forecasting, and large-team resource management.
Verdict: Start with Bonsai if you are small and want the least fragmented path from signed client to paid invoice.
4. ClickUp: best customizable lower-cost option
ClickUp works well for consultants who want to design their own operating model. The annual pricing signal is Free, $7 per user per month for Unlimited, and $12 for Business. Unlimited includes custom fields, forms, Gantt charts, integrations, native time tracking, goals, portfolio management, resource management, and permission-controlled guests. The free plan allows unlimited tasks and free members but has storage and feature limits. See ClickUp’s current pricing for higher-tier and AI costs.
Its advantage is flexibility: a firm can create different templates for discovery, workshops, implementation, and advisory retainers. Its weakness is that someone must govern those templates. Without a naming convention, required fields, and a standard status model, every consultant can create a different version of the same engagement.
- Best for: configuration-minded teams that want documents, forms, tasks, goals, and time tracking in one workspace.
- Watch out for: native project-finance, invoicing, and profitability capabilities are less central than they are in Teamwork, Scoro, or Productive.
Verdict: Choose ClickUp for flexibility and price, not because broad feature coverage automatically makes it a complete professional-services system.
5. Asana: best for polished, structured workflows
Asana is a strong choice when ownership, deadlines, approvals, and adoption matter more than native billing. It is particularly effective for repeatable consulting methodologies, portfolio visibility, and cross-functional collaboration.
Asana’s displayed annual pricing is Personal at no cost for up to two users, Starter at $10.99 per user per month, and Advanced at $24.99. Starter adds timeline and Gantt views, dashboards, automations, forms, templates, custom fields, and unlimited free guests. Advanced adds portfolios, goals, workload, approvals and proofing, view-only licenses, and integrations such as Salesforce, Tableau, and Power BI. The Personal plan lists time tracking through integrations, so billing-oriented buyers should not assume Asana is a native timesheet system.
- Best for: teams that value ease of adoption, structured workflows, and clear client or internal ownership.
- Watch out for: native invoices, retainers, billable-rate management, and project-margin tracking are not its strongest areas.
Verdict: Choose Asana when accounting and time tracking already live elsewhere and the project workflow is the main requirement.
6. Productive: best for resource planning and project margins
Productive is aimed at firms where capacity, utilization, allocation, budgeting, revenue forecasting, and profitability are central. That makes it more relevant to a growing consultancy with several simultaneous engagements than to a solo advisor seeking a lightweight client-management tool.
Available comparison coverage places Productive among the platforms built around client-service operations, resource planning, budgeting, utilization, revenue forecasting, and project profitability. A directly verified current Productive pricing page was not available in the supplied research, so do not rely on an exact price without checking Productive’s official site.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →- Best for: firms outgrowing basic task management and needing staffing and margin visibility.
- Watch out for: pricing and plan limits require confirmation, and the operational depth may be excessive for a solo consultant.
Verdict: Put Productive on the shortlist when resource forecasting and project margin are the dominant needs.
Best Value
Best software by consulting model
| Consulting situation | Likely best fits | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Solo consultant with occasional projects | Bonsai, Asana, ClickUp | Bonsai handles client administration; Asana and ClickUp offer flexible delivery workflows. |
| Small firm needing proposals and invoicing | Bonsai, Teamwork | Both connect delivery with client-facing administration, with different levels of operational depth. |
| Multi-client team with billable staff | Teamwork, Productive, Scoro | These are stronger candidates for time, capacity, budgets, and profitability. |
| Retainer-based advisory firm | Teamwork, Scoro, Productive | Retainers require recurring budgets, burn visibility, and utilization controls. |
| Large firm forecasting resources | Scoro, Productive, enterprise PSA tools | Capacity, utilization, cost, and margin reporting become more important than task views. |
| Highly customized workflows | ClickUp, Asana, monday.com | These are attractive when configuration and adoption outweigh native consulting finance. |
| Strategy and workshop-heavy work | Asana or ClickUp plus a whiteboard tool | Use a dedicated whiteboard such as Miro for discovery and workshop mapping rather than forcing every activity into one system. |
How to compare time, billing, retainers, and profitability
Native time tracking is a major dividing line. Teamwork includes billable time tracking on Basics, with higher plans adding time budgets, retainers, and invoice creation. Scoro includes time and billable-work functionality within its project and financial system. Bonsai includes time tracking on Basic. ClickUp includes native time tracking on Unlimited. Asana’s free Personal plan points buyers toward integrations. Productive should be checked at the specific plan level.
Do not stop at a “time tracking” checkbox. A useful consulting workflow is:
- Create the client and engagement.
- Set hourly, fixed-fee, or retainer billing.
- Enter budgeted hours or value.
- Assign project, role, or consultant rates.
- Require time against project tasks or meetings.
- Review burn and remaining capacity weekly.
- Approve or lock time before invoicing.
- Compare actual cost and margin with the estimate.
For example, Teamwork’s project-rate documentation explains how project-specific rates can support negotiated client pricing and nonstandard billing models. That is more useful than simply knowing that a platform has a timer.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Client collaboration: portal, guest, and shared project are different
A client invitation is not necessarily a client portal. Before buying, check whether clients can see only their project, whether internal comments and costs are hidden, whether they can create or reassign tasks, and whether status reports or dashboards are client-facing.
Bonsai includes a client portal on Essentials. Teamwork emphasizes client permissions and collaboration. Scoro lists a customer portal as an add-on. Asana offers unlimited free guests on Starter and view-only licenses on Advanced, but confirm how those rules apply to your exact user mix. Also check notification controls, file sharing, approvals, branding, and whether client access is genuinely free.
Pricing traps and implementation risks
Calculate the cost for your actual internal team, not the headline price. Include minimum seats, the plan required for time tracking or portals, guest rules, accounting integrations, automation and storage limits, onboarding fees, and monthly-versus-annual billing.
Scoro’s indicated five-seat minimum and Bonsai Elite’s three-user minimum matter greatly to small practices. Teamwork’s free plan is limited to five users and five projects. Asana Personal is limited to two users. ClickUp’s free plan permits unlimited members but still has storage and feature restrictions.
Over-customization is another cost. Start with one engagement template, one status model, one naming convention, and a short list of required fields. Decide who administers permissions and templates. Otherwise, a flexible platform can produce inconsistent reports and unreliable budgets.
Finally, separate the systems involved. Project management, professional-services automation, CRM, accounting, invoicing, payments, and resource management are related but not identical. A platform may connect to QuickBooks, Xero, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Slack, Teams, CRM systems, calendars, e-signature tools, document storage, BI platforms, and automation services without replacing all of them. Verify whether each connection is native, third-party, or restricted to a higher plan.
Quick Recap
Buying checklist
- How many internal users need paid seats?
- Will clients need logins, and what exactly should they see?
- Are engagements hourly, fixed-fee, retainer-based, or mixed?
- Is native time tracking mandatory?
- Do you need invoices and payments inside the same platform?
- Must the system support project-specific or role-based rates?
- Do you need resource utilization, forecasting, or only task assignments?
- Which accounting, CRM, calendar, communication, and document tools must connect?
- Who will maintain templates, permissions, and reporting?
- How much implementation and behavior change can the firm tolerate?
Final decision
- Choose Bonsai if you are solo or very small and need proposals, contracts, billing, payments, and client management.
- Choose Teamwork if client delivery, billable time, budgets, retainers, and permissions are central.
- Choose Scoro if financial control, utilization, and profitability are the priority.
- Choose ClickUp if flexibility and a lower entry price matter most and someone can govern the setup.
- Choose Asana if structured workflows and adoption matter more than native billing.
- Choose Productive if resource planning and project margins dominate the decision, after verifying current pricing and plan limits.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
