JPMorgan currently has the stronger evidence of dividend safety, but Wells Fargo’s supposedly higher dividend yield is not verified by the available data. A yield comparison requires same-date share prices, and comparable October 13, 2026 prices were not established. What can be compared directly is dividend policy, earnings coverage, regulatory capital and the Federal Reserve’s common stress scenario: JPMorgan’s projected minimum CET1 ratio was 14.2%, versus 10.1% for Wells Fargo.
That makes JPMorgan the better-supported choice for an investor prioritizing resilience. It does not make its dividend risk-free, and it does not prove Wells Fargo is an unsuitable income investment. The right conclusion depends on verified market prices, sustainable earnings and each bank’s capital position relative to its own requirements.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
First, separate dividend yield from the dividend per share
A company’s declared dividend is a cash amount per share. Dividend yield is that annualized cash amount divided by the share price on a specified date:
Dividend yield = annual dividend per share ÷ share price
#1 Best Overall
Wells Fargo’s latest located declaration approved a $0.50 common dividend for the third quarter of 2026. JPMorgan Chase declared a $1.65 common dividend for the same quarter, payable October 31, 2026. Annualizing those quarterly rates produces $2.00 and $6.60 per share, respectively; neither annualized figure is a yield until it is divided by a dated stock price. The declarations are documented in Wells Fargo’s dividend history and JPMorgan’s September 15, 2026 announcement.
| Measure | Wells Fargo | JPMorgan Chase | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latest located quarterly common dividend | $0.50 for Q3 2026 | $1.65 for Q3 2026 | Cash declared per share; not a yield |
| Annualized rate from that quarter | $2.00 per share | $6.60 per share | Simple four-quarter annualization; not a forecast or yield |
| Comparable October 13, 2026 yield | Not established | Not established | Requires same-date prices and an identical calculation convention |
Do not infer a higher yield from a larger quarterly payment: share prices and share counts differ. A stock with a smaller annual dividend can have a higher yield if its price is sufficiently lower. Conversely, a larger payment can produce a lower yield at a higher price.
What the available payout evidence says
Wells Fargo’s 2025 payout ratio
Wells Fargo reported 2025 net income of $21.3 billion and diluted earnings per share of $6.26. Its annual report defines the common-dividend payout ratio as common dividends declared per share divided by diluted earnings per share and reported a 27.2% ratio for 2025. The calculation is backward-looking: it describes that year’s earnings and declared dividends, not the next four quarters. See the 2025 Wells Fargo Form 10-K.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →A 27.2% ratio leaves substantial earnings after the common dividend under that definition. The remaining earnings can support capital, absorb losses or fund other uses, but they are not automatically available for distribution. Credit costs, weaker revenue, regulatory requirements and management decisions can all change future payments.
Rank #2
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
Why there is no matching JPMorgan ratio here
A directly comparable annual JPMorgan payout ratio was not established from the same period and definition. Do not compare Wells Fargo’s 2025 annual ratio with JPMorgan’s quarterly net income, a different fiscal period or a ratio calculated using another earnings measure. A proper comparison would use both banks’ annual common dividends declared per share and diluted EPS for the same fiscal year, with definitions confirmed in each filing.
Capital ratios provide a more useful safety test
Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital is a core regulatory measure because it compares high-quality capital with risk-weighted assets. A higher ratio generally provides a larger cushion against losses, but the number must be read with its regulatory approach, reporting date and applicable buffers.
| Capital measure | Wells Fargo | JPMorgan Chase | Qualification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized CET1 at June 30, 2026 | 10.26% | 14.1% | Same quarter, reported ratios; approaches and firm requirements still need context |
| Requirement cited in the available filing | Wells Fargo said 10.26% exceeded its 8.50% minimum plus buffers | 11.5% requirement including buffers at December 31, 2025 | Different dates and regulatory contexts; do not treat these requirements as a like-for-like June 2026 comparison |
| 2025 year-end standardized CET1 | 10.61%; standardized approach identified as the binding framework | Not stated in the available comparison | Use the stated framework rather than mixing approaches |
Wells Fargo’s June 30, 2026 Form 10-Q states that its CET1 ratio was 10.26% under the Standardized Approach, which it identifies as its binding framework. JPMorgan reported a 14.1% standardized CET1 ratio at the same quarter-end in its second-quarter 2026 earnings release; Wells Fargo’s figure and stated requirement are in its June 30, 2026 Form 10-Q.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
The difference is meaningful as a reported capital cushion, yet it is not a complete safety score. Banks can have different asset mixes, risk weights, earnings volatility and supervisory expectations. Compare each actual ratio with the requirement that applies to that bank and date, rather than subtracting one company’s requirement from the other company’s ratio.
The same Federal Reserve stress scenario favors JPMorgan
The cleanest apples-to-apples evidence in the available material comes from the Federal Reserve’s 2025 severely adverse stress test. The regulator reported the “Projected minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio under the severely adverse scenario, 2025:Q1–2027:Q1.”
| Bank | Projected minimum CET1 ratio | Scenario and period |
|---|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase | 14.2% | Federal Reserve 2025 severely adverse scenario, 2025:Q1–2027:Q1 |
| Wells Fargo | 10.1% | Federal Reserve 2025 severely adverse scenario, 2025:Q1–2027:Q1 |
JPMorgan’s 14.2% modeled minimum is 4.1 percentage points above Wells Fargo’s 10.1% in that test. This supports describing JPMorgan as stronger on this specific capital-resilience measure. The results are conditional model outputs based on the Federal Reserve’s assumptions about the economy, markets, losses and capital actions; they are not forecasts of actual results or guarantees that either bank will maintain its dividend. The full table is in the Federal Reserve’s 2025 stress-test results.
Recent dividend actions show intent, not permanence
Wells Fargo approved the $0.50 Q3 2026 common dividend. JPMorgan declared a $1.65 Q3 2026 dividend payable October 31, 2026. Both actions indicate that each board was willing to return that amount at the time of declaration. A board can change a future dividend if earnings, capital rules or economic conditions change; a declaration should not be treated as a commitment to every later quarter.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
JPMorgan also announced a 2.5% stress capital buffer through September 30, 2027, in its June 24, 2026 capital-return announcement. The buffer is a regulatory constraint that affects how much capital can be distributed, not a promise that the dividend will grow. The announcement is available at JPMorgan’s capital-return release.
Rank #4
Check the quality of earnings behind the coverage
JPMorgan’s second-quarter 2026 reported income included large investment gains
JPMorgan reported $21.2 billion of net income in the second quarter of 2026. The release identified $4.6 billion of gains related to Visa shares and $1.0 billion of gains on certain equity investments. Those items can increase reported earnings for the quarter without representing a recurring quarterly stream. An investor assessing dividend capacity should separate recurring revenue, credit costs and net interest income from one-time or market-sensitive gains rather than annualizing that quarter’s net income mechanically. The amounts are disclosed in the JPMorgan Q2 2026 earnings release.
Wells Fargo’s ratio still needs a forward-looking check
Wells Fargo’s 27.2% 2025 payout ratio is useful historical evidence, but it does not reveal how future credit losses, loan growth, interest-rate changes or regulatory capital demands will affect distributable earnings. Review subsequent quarterly filings for changes in net charge-offs, provisions, revenue mix and CET1 before assuming the 2025 coverage level persists.
How to calculate a current, fair yield comparison
If you want to test the yield premise yourself, use the same method for both banks and record the date. A reproducible calculation requires more than copying a headline yield.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →- Choose one price date. Use the closing price for Wells Fargo and JPMorgan on the same trading day. Do not pair one bank’s current quote with the other bank’s month-old price.
- Choose trailing or forward yield. Trailing yield uses the dividends actually paid over the prior four quarters. Forward yield uses the latest declared rate, often annualized as four times the current quarterly dividend. Label which convention you use.
- Use the corresponding dividend record. Include only common dividends, and state whether any special dividend is included. The $2.00 and $6.60 annualized figures above assume four quarters at the latest located rates; they are not promises.
- Divide and express as a percentage. For example, divide the annual per-share amount by that bank’s same-date share price and multiply by 100. Keep the full precision in your worksheet, then round the displayed result consistently.
- Save the inputs. Record the price source, closing date, dividend declaration or payment dates and whether the result is trailing or forward. Yields change whenever prices move, even when the board leaves the dividend unchanged.
Which investor might prefer each stock?
For a safety-first dividend investor
JPMorgan has the stronger documented case: a 14.2% projected minimum CET1 ratio versus 10.1% for Wells Fargo in the same severely adverse test, and a 14.1% reported standardized CET1 ratio versus Wells Fargo’s 10.26% at June 30, 2026. Those figures support a preference for JPMorgan when capital resilience is the primary objective, while still requiring a review of recurring earnings and valuation.
Best Value
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
For an investor considering Wells Fargo at a lower price
Wells Fargo may offer a more attractive yield at a particular moment if its share price is low enough, but that must be demonstrated with same-date prices. The historical 27.2% payout ratio provides evidence of 2025 coverage. The trade-off is a lower stress-test CET1 outcome and a lower reported June 2026 CET1 ratio in the figures cited here.
For a total-return investor
Do not select solely on dividend rate. Compare valuation, expected earnings growth, credit quality, capital return through repurchases, dividend taxes and the possibility that a high yield reflects a falling share price. A high indicated yield can rise because the price dropped in response to deteriorating fundamentals.
Risks that can change dividend safety
- Credit losses: Rising defaults increase provisions and reduce earnings available to support capital and dividends.
- Interest-rate and funding pressure: Changes in deposit costs, loan yields and securities values can compress net interest income.
- Market-sensitive earnings: Gains on investments, such as those identified in JPMorgan’s second quarter, may reverse or fail to recur.
- Regulatory requirements: Higher stress capital buffers or other supervisory changes can restrict distributions even when reported earnings are strong.
- Share-price volatility: It changes the yield calculation daily without changing the declared cash dividend.
- Board decisions: Common dividends remain subject to future declarations and can be held flat, reduced or suspended.
Bottom line: JPMorgan has the better-supported safety record, while Wells Fargo’s yield claim still needs proof
The evidence supports JPMorgan as the stronger dividend-safety candidate on capital and stress performance. Its 14.2% projected minimum CET1 ratio in the Federal Reserve’s 2025 severely adverse scenario exceeded Wells Fargo’s 10.1%, and its June 30, 2026 standardized CET1 ratio was 14.1% versus Wells Fargo’s 10.26%. Wells Fargo’s 27.2% 2025 payout ratio is a favorable historical coverage measure, but no directly comparable JPMorgan annual ratio was established.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesDo not repeat that Wells Fargo yielded more than JPMorgan on October 13, 2026 unless you supply comparable prices and a defined trailing or forward calculation. Once the yield is verified, weigh it against recurring earnings, capital relative to each bank’s requirements, stress-test assumptions and the possibility that recent earnings contain nonrecurring gains. That process answers the real question—whether additional income compensates for lower demonstrated resilience—without treating either bank’s dividend as guaranteed.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
