Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Nasdaq-100 ETFs give you a way to invest in funds designed to track the Nasdaq-100, but the index label alone does not tell you what a fund costs to own or trade. For a long-term buy-and-hold investor, QQQM’s lower issuer-reported expense ratio may be worth weighing; for someone who trades frequently, QQQ’s liquidity positioning may matter more. Before choosing, compare the benchmark, current holdings, expense ratio, trading costs, and the tax treatment of your account. This guide covers U.S.-listed funds and general U.S. federal tax considerations; it is not personalized investment or tax advice.
At a glance
The fees below are issuer-reported expense ratios, not the funds’ share prices or a complete measure of trading cost. The use cases reflect Invesco’s positioning, not a universal recommendation. Fee figures were checked November 2026.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →| Name | Best for | Key spec | Free plan / price | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invesco QQQM | Long-term buy-and-hold investors, according to Invesco’s positioning | Tracks the Nasdaq-100; 103 holdings as of November 3, 2026 | 0.15% total expense ratio | November 2026 |
| Invesco QQQ | Investors who place greater value on liquidity and trading, according to Invesco’s positioning | Tracks the Nasdaq-100; Invesco describes it as highly liquid and actively traded | 0.18% expense ratio | November 2026 |
Nasdaq also lists State Street SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX) and iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) as U.S.-listed routes to Nasdaq-100 exposure. Their listing does not establish that their fees, holdings, structure, tracking, or trading costs match QQQ or QQQM. The comparison below focuses on the two funds for which current issuer details are available here. Nasdaq’s ways-to-invest directory is a starting point for identifying other candidates.
What should I compare before buying a Nasdaq-100 ETF?
Compare the fund’s index exposure, ongoing expenses, holdings and concentration, likely execution costs, and the account in which you will hold it. Those factors answer different questions: what you own, what you pay over time, what a trade may cost, and how taxes may apply.
Popular on Amazon
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
- Confirm the benchmark. Check the fund’s current prospectus and product page to verify that it tracks the Nasdaq-100 and understand whether it uses a different strategy or benchmark. A shared index name is a useful starting point, not proof that two funds are identical in every respect.
- Compare the expense ratio. Use the current issuer figure and note any date or fee waiver information. The expense ratio is a recurring fund expense, not the total cost of buying and selling shares.
- Review dated holdings information. Look at the holdings list, weights, and sector exposure, and note the date of the disclosure. Holdings and weights can change, so an old snapshot should not be treated as a current portfolio.
- Consider execution. Compare live bid-ask spreads, market depth, and any premium or discount to net asset value (NAV), taking account of your order size and timing. Also check whether your broker charges a commission.
- Identify the account type. A taxable brokerage account and a tax-advantaged account can have different tax consequences. Fund structure does not eliminate tax on distributions or gains when you sell.
- Match the choice to how you will invest. Someone trading often may place more weight on liquidity and execution. Someone holding for years may focus more on recurring expenses. Neither priority makes one fund best for everyone.
What is the difference between QQQ and QQQM?
Both are Invesco funds that track the Nasdaq-100, but Invesco reports different expense ratios and presents them for different use cases: QQQM for lower-expense long-term holding and QQQ for liquidity-oriented trading. Whether that distinction matters to you depends on how you invest and the actual costs you face.
Invesco reports a 0.15% total expense ratio for QQQM and a 0.18% expense ratio for QQQ. The difference is 0.03 percentage points. At a constant balance of $10,000, that works out to $3 per year in stated fund expenses: $15 versus $18. This is arithmetic based on the published ratios, not a forecast of actual returns or total ownership costs. Balances change, investment results are uncertain, and trading costs are separate.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Invesco describes QQQ as a highly liquid and actively traded security, while its fund materials frame QQQM as a lower-expense choice for buy-and-hold investors. Treat that framing as the issuer’s description of intended use, not impartial proof that either fund is the better choice for your circumstances. If you make frequent trades, the spread and execution quality on your own orders may be more consequential than a small difference in annual fund expenses. If you expect to hold for a long time and trade infrequently, recurring fees may deserve more attention.
Invesco reported that QQQ ranked second among U.S. ETFs by average daily volume as of June 30, 2026, citing Bloomberg. That is a dated indicator of trading activity, not a promise of a particular spread, fill price, or outcome for an individual order. Invesco’s QQQ education page provides that dated ranking; check current market conditions before trading.
Also popular on Amazon
Are Nasdaq-100 ETFs technology funds?
Not necessarily. The Nasdaq-100 label does not mean a fund is a pure technology-sector fund: Invesco says QQQM has exposure to technology as well as consumer discretionary, health care, and industrials.
For a current view of what you would own, use the fund’s latest holdings disclosure and check its as-of date. Invesco reported that QQQM had 103 holdings and a market value of $105.97 billion as of November 3, 2026. Those figures describe a dated snapshot, not a permanent feature of the fund. The same caution applies to individual holdings, weights, and sector allocations: consult current disclosure rather than assuming a past list or percentage still applies. QQQM’s Invesco product page is the source for its reported snapshot and fund information.
Concentration is a separate question from sector classification. Review the current portfolio to see how much exposure is allocated to individual holdings and sectors, then decide whether that exposure fits your broader investment plan. The figures in this comparison do not establish that a particular concentration level is appropriate for you or predict future performance.
Is the expense ratio the full cost of an ETF?
No. The expense ratio measures recurring fund expenses, while the price you get when trading can also be affected by the bid-ask spread, brokerage commissions, and whether the ETF’s market price is above or below its NAV.
Also popular on Amazon
The bid-ask spread is the gap between the price buyers are bidding and the price sellers are asking. A wider spread can increase the cost of entering or exiting a position. A fund’s own trading volume is not the only factor in liquidity: the liquidity of the securities it holds can matter too. Invesco notes that investors should consider liquidity beyond a fund’s trading volume. For a real order, check the live spread and available market depth rather than assuming a historical volume ranking guarantees easy execution.
An ETF can also trade at a premium or discount to NAV, which is the per-share value of its underlying assets. A premium means the market price is above NAV; a discount means it is below. That gap can affect the effective price you pay or receive. Commissions, if charged by your broker, add another possible cost. Together, these factors explain why a lower expense ratio does not automatically make one trade or one fund cheaper in every situation. The SEC’s investor guide to mutual funds and ETFs and the fund’s current disclosures are useful references when considering ETF costs.
For a small, infrequent purchase, a few dollars of annual expense difference may be more relevant than frequent-trading considerations; for repeated orders or larger trades, execution deserves closer attention. That is a decision framework, not a claim that spreads or total costs will always favor one ticker. Market conditions change, so compare conditions around the time you intend to trade.
Are Nasdaq-100 ETFs tax efficient in a taxable account?
They can have a structural tax-efficiency advantage over mutual funds in some circumstances, but ETF ownership is not tax-free. In a U.S. taxable account, investors may owe tax on dividends or capital-gains distributions even if they did not sell shares, and may owe tax on a gain when they sell their own shares.
Also popular on Amazon
The mechanism is that an ETF can sometimes meet redemptions by delivering securities in kind to authorized participants instead of selling appreciated holdings for cash. That can reduce the need for the fund to sell securities and pass capital gains to remaining shareholders. The SEC says: “ETFs are typically more tax efficient in this regard than mutual funds because ETF shares are frequently redeemed in-kind by the Authorized Participants.” The qualification matters: the statement describes a potential advantage in this respect, not a guarantee that a particular ETF will make no capital-gains distributions or that an investor will owe no tax. Investors can still have tax consequences from fund distributions and from selling shares at a gain.
The SEC also notes that the ETF-versus-mutual-fund tax-efficiency distinction is not relevant when the investment is held in a tax-advantaged account such as an IRA or 401(k). Tax treatment depends on account type, distribution character, jurisdiction, and individual circumstances. This discussion is limited to general U.S. federal considerations; it does not determine an individual tax bill or cover state, local, or non-U.S. rules. Consult a qualified tax professional for advice about your situation.
Are QNDX and IQQ alternatives to QQQ and QQQM?
They are additional U.S.-listed ETF candidates for Nasdaq-100 exposure, according to Nasdaq’s directory, but the information available here is not enough to compare their costs or trading characteristics with QQQ and QQQM.
Nasdaq lists State Street SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX) and iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) alongside QQQ and QQQM. A directory entry establishes that a product is listed as a route to the index; it does not verify the current expense ratio, holdings, fund structure, tracking difference, liquidity, or spread. Before choosing either, check its issuer’s current prospectus and product page, then compare the same criteria used for QQQ and QQQM. Do not infer that a newer or differently named fund is cheaper, more tax-efficient, or interchangeable in execution without current evidence.
Also popular on Amazon
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Nasdaq’s directory also includes mutual funds and separately managed or direct-indexing services. Those are different investment wrappers or services, not additional ETFs, so they should not be treated as like-for-like entries in an ETF fee comparison.
How can I make the comparison before placing an order?
Use current fund disclosures and market information, and separate long-term ownership costs from the cost of executing a trade. This checklist can help keep the comparison focused:
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors- Write down the exposure you want. Confirm that the fund’s current benchmark is the Nasdaq-100 and review the prospectus for its investment approach.
- Record the fee and date. Use the issuer’s current expense ratio and note when the figure applies. For the figures in this article, QQQM is 0.15% and QQQ is 0.18%, as reported in November 2026.
- Read the latest portfolio disclosure. Check its as-of date, holdings, weights, and sector exposure. Do not rely on a dated snapshot as a current portfolio.
- Estimate trading friction at your intended time. Look at the bid-ask spread, market depth, and market price relative to NAV; account for any commission your brokerage charges. Recheck when you place an order because these can change.
- Consider how often you expect to trade. A long holding period makes recurring fees more relevant; frequent trading increases the importance of execution costs. This is a weighting exercise, not a guarantee of which fund will cost less.
- Check the account’s tax context. Distinguish a taxable brokerage account from a tax-advantaged account and consider distributions as well as the eventual sale of your shares. Seek individualized tax guidance where needed.
- Recheck every candidate on its issuer’s current materials. Nasdaq’s directory can help identify funds, but it is not a substitute for a prospectus, current holdings, or live trading information.
For a long-term investor deciding between QQQ and QQQM, the 0.03-percentage-point fee difference is concrete, while the value of QQQ’s liquidity positioning depends on actual trading needs and market conditions. For a frequent trader, compare real execution conditions; for an investor who rarely trades, weigh the recurring expense alongside the fund’s exposure and portfolio. Neither ticker is automatically right for every investor.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a 0.03-percentage-point fee difference mean in basis points?
It is 3 basis points: one basis point is 0.01 percentage point. The dollar impact depends on the balance and the time invested; the $3-per-$10,000 illustration assumes a constant balance for a year.
Does Nasdaq’s list of funds mean they all track the index in exactly the same way?
No. The directory identifies products as routes to Nasdaq-100 exposure, but it does not establish that their structures, holdings, tracking, or costs are identical. Check each issuer’s current prospectus for those details.
Can the holdings shown on an ETF page change after I buy shares?
Yes. The holdings and weights are fund disclosures at a particular point in time, not a permanent list. An investor should use the latest available holdings file when checking exposure.
Recommended Free Tools
Does the SEC’s ETF tax-efficiency explanation apply to investors outside the United States?
The tax discussion here is limited to general U.S. federal context. Other countries may apply different rules, and this material does not address state or local tax treatment or individual circumstances.
