Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Neither Nike nor adidas is automatically the better stock. A defensible comparison starts by aligning Nike’s fiscal year ending in May with adidas’s calendar year, keeping reported and currency-neutral growth separate, comparing like-for-like margins, and then checking channel health, inventory, cash generation, risk and valuation against your own time horizon.
The latest evidence points in different directions: Nike reported essentially flat fiscal 2026 revenue of $46.398 billion and a 4% reported-currency decline in fiscal Q1 2027, while adidas reported 2025 sales of €24.811 billion, up 5% in euros, and later guided for 9% to 10% currency-neutral revenue growth in 2026. Those figures describe momentum, not a complete investment verdict. Current prices, synchronized valuation multiples, balance-sheet data and your risk tolerance are still required before deciding which shares fit you.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
At a glance
| Name | Best for | Key spec | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nike | Investors assessing a large global brand through a channel-reset and near-term revenue slowdown | Fiscal 2026 revenue: $46.398 billion; fiscal Q1 2027 revenue: $11.2 billion, down 4% reported | Nov 2026 |
| adidas | Investors assessing faster recent reported growth and a management outlook that includes reinvestment | 2025 net sales: €24.811 billion; 2025 operating margin: 8.3%; 2026 currency-neutral growth outlook: 9%–10% | Nov 2026 |
No price, free-plan or valuation column is shown because synchronized current prices and comparable multiples were not established in the underlying evidence. The figures use different currencies and reporting periods.
How do you line up Nike and adidas reporting periods?
Start with the calendar, not the headline growth rate. Nike’s fiscal 2026 ended May 31, 2026, and its fiscal first quarter of 2027 covered the three months ended August 31, 2026. adidas’s 2025 financial year ended December 31, 2025, while its latest located update was a preliminary third-quarter release dated October 20, 2026.
Popular on Amazon
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
A Nike fiscal-year number therefore overlaps two calendar years, whereas an adidas calendar-year number does not. Comparing Nike fiscal 2026 with adidas 2025 can be useful as a broad orientation, but it is not a clean same-period test. For a tighter analysis, use trailing-twelve-month figures ending on the same date, or compare corresponding quarters and state the dates in every table.
Currency creates a second mismatch. Nike reports in U.S. dollars and adidas in euros. Converting one company’s results into the other currency requires an exchange-rate date and a stated method; an average-period rate is generally more appropriate for income-statement figures than a single day’s spot rate. A conversion can make scale easier to visualize, but it does not remove the companies’ different geographic mixes or hedging policies.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteWhat do the latest revenue and profit figures actually show?
The numbers below are useful signals, but they should not be read as a simultaneous quarterly comparison.
| Measure | Nike | adidas | How to interpret it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latest full-year sales | $46.398 billion in fiscal 2026, versus $46.309 billion in fiscal 2025 | €24.811 billion in 2025, versus €23.683 billion in 2024 | Nike was essentially flat in reported dollars; adidas grew 5% in euros |
| Most recent quarterly sales update | $11.2 billion in fiscal Q1 2027, down 4% reported and 5% currency neutral year over year | Preliminary Q3 2026 revenue of €7.252 billion, up 9% in euros and 7% currency neutral | These are different quarters and cannot be treated as a head-to-head period |
| Profitability figure available in the evidence | Fiscal Q1 2027 gross margin of 42.8%, up 60 basis points | 2025 operating profit of €2.056 billion and operating margin of 8.3% | Gross margin and operating margin measure different layers of the income statement |
Sources: NIKE, Inc., fiscal 2026 Form 10-K and quarter ended August 31, 2026 Form 10-Q; adidas 2025 annual-report materials and October 20, 2026 preliminary Q3 release.
What Nike’s figures imply
Nike’s fiscal 2026 revenue was $46.398 billion, only slightly above $46.309 billion a year earlier. Nike Brand revenue was $45.222 billion. The subsequent fiscal Q1 2027 quarter was weaker: revenue was $11.2 billion, down 4% on a reported basis and 5% currency neutral. That pattern says the comparison should focus on the direction and durability of the reset, not merely on Nike’s much larger absolute sales figure.
There was one constructive detail in the quarter. Gross margin increased 60 basis points to 42.8%, with lower warehousing and logistics costs cited as a contributor. A margin gain alongside falling sales can mean cost actions are working, but it can also reflect temporary mix, freight or timing benefits. It does not by itself prove that demand or long-run pricing power has improved.
Recommended Free Tools
What adidas’s figures imply
adidas reported 2025 net sales of €24.811 billion, up from €23.683 billion, while operating profit rose to €2.056 billion from €1.337 billion. Operating margin improved from 5.6% to 8.3%. The company also reported 13% currency-neutral growth for the adidas brand, which is a company-defined supplemental measure rather than the same thing as growth in reported euros.
Comparability needs an adjustment: adidas said 2025 included no Yeezy revenue because the remaining inventory had been sold in 2024. The prior-year comparison included approximately €650 million of Yeezy sales. Growth that excludes a discontinued contribution can still be meaningful, but the bridge from the prior year should be understood before treating the rate as purely organic momentum.
Also popular on Amazon
In its October 20, 2026 preliminary Q3 release, adidas reported revenue of €7.252 billion, up 9% in euros and 7% currency neutral, and operating profit of €1.008 billion, up 37%. The release said a roughly €200 million tariff refund helped gross-margin improvement. That benefit is important context: part of the quarter’s profit strength came from an item that may not recur at the same level.
Which company has the stronger growth quality?
Growth quality is more informative than a single percentage. Break each company’s result into reported currency, currency-neutral growth, geography, product category, and sales channel, then ask whether the drivers can repeat without unusual promotions or one-time benefits.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Nike’s fiscal 2026 channel split is especially revealing. Wholesale revenue rose 6% to $27.453 billion, while sales through Nike Direct fell 6% to $17.720 billion. The total can look stable even while the mix changes materially. Wholesale can restore reach through retail partners, but it may carry different gross-margin economics and gives Nike less control over presentation and customer data than direct sales.
In fiscal Q1 2027, Nike Direct revenue was $4.1 billion versus $4.5 billion in the prior-year quarter. That makes the channel question current rather than historical: investors need to determine whether the decline reflects deliberate inventory normalization, weaker digital conversion, changes in store traffic, product timing, or a broader brand-demand issue. The evidence supplied here does not establish which explanation will dominate.
adidas’s 13% currency-neutral brand growth in 2025 and 7% currency-neutral growth in preliminary Q3 2026 suggest momentum that is less dependent on euro movements than the reported figures. Still, currency-neutral rates are defined by the company and are not a substitute for reported sales, cash receipts or shareholder returns. A strong comparison checks both rates and identifies the currencies in which the business actually sells and incurs costs.
Product launches, regional trends and wholesale-versus-direct data should be read together. A company can post high currency-neutral growth by cycling a weak prior period, while another can have low reported growth because of exchange rates despite healthy local demand. The useful question is whether volume, full-price sell-through, distribution and repeat demand are improving at the same time.
How should Nike and adidas profitability be compared?
Compare gross margin with gross margin, operating margin with operating margin, and earnings with earnings. Nike’s 42.8% figure is a fiscal Q1 2027 gross margin. adidas’s 8.3% figure is a 2025 operating margin. Putting those percentages in one ranking would be an accounting error because operating margin is after operating expenses while gross margin is before them.
For Nike, the 60-basis-point gross-margin increase partly reflected lower warehousing and logistics costs. The next questions are whether that benefit persists, whether markdowns rise to clear inventory, and whether selling and administrative costs absorb the gross-margin improvement. Nike’s latest quarter ended with inventory of $7.8 billion, up 5% from May 31, 2026, so inventory turnover and discounting deserve close attention.
Also popular on Amazon
For adidas, the 2025 operating-margin improvement from 5.6% to 8.3% was substantial, but the Q3 2026 release identified a roughly €200 million tariff refund as a contributor to gross-margin improvement. Normalize that item when estimating recurring profitability. Also separate the effect of the discontinued Yeezy comparison from underlying brand economics.
A useful worksheet has at least five lines for each company: reported sales growth; currency-neutral growth; gross margin; operating margin; and operating profit excluding clearly identified exceptional items. Add diluted earnings per share only after confirming that share counts, fiscal periods and accounting treatments are comparable.
What do distribution and inventory reveal?
Channel mix tells you how a brand reaches customers and who controls the economics. Nike’s fiscal 2026 pattern of wholesale growth and Nike Direct decline means an investor should not summarize the year as simply “flat sales.” The mix may affect gross margin, marketing efficiency, returns, working capital and the bargaining relationship with retail partners.
Inventory is a leading warning signal when sales soften. Nike’s $7.8 billion quarter-end inventory, 5% above the May 31 level, needs to be read against product launches, seasonal build and currency effects. The important follow-up disclosures are weeks of supply, markdown rates, aged inventory and whether inventory growth is concentrated in regions or categories with weaker demand.
The supplied adidas evidence does not provide a matched channel and inventory dataset. Do not fill that gap with assumptions based on brand visibility. Pull the same disclosures from adidas’s latest full filing before concluding that either company has better distribution discipline.
How do you compare balance-sheet strength and cash generation?
Sales and margins do not show whether profits turn into cash or whether a company is using debt to support shareholder returns. Review the latest filings for total debt, lease liabilities, cash, operating cash flow, capital expenditure, dividends, repurchases and working-capital movements.
This evidence set does not contain matched balance-sheet and cash-flow figures for Nike and adidas, so it cannot support a claim that one has superior financial resilience. That is a limitation to resolve, not a reason to infer a winner from revenue scale.
Use a consistent checklist:
- Calculate net debt including material lease obligations, and distinguish seasonal cash peaks from normal liquidity.
- Compare operating cash flow with net income over several periods rather than relying on one quarter.
- Subtract capital expenditure to estimate free cash flow using the same definition for both companies.
- Measure dividends and repurchases against free cash flow, not just reported earnings.
- Inspect inventory, receivables and payables for working-capital pressure when growth accelerates or slows.
- Check whether restructuring, litigation, tax or tariff items make a period unusually favorable or unfavorable.
Nike returned approximately $0.6 billion to shareholders through dividends in fiscal Q1 2027. That is a capital-allocation data point, not proof that the payout is safer than adidas’s; the full-year cash-flow statements and payout policies must be compared on equal dates.
Also popular on Amazon
What risks could change the comparison?
Nike identifies geopolitical developments, tax regulation, foreign-exchange movements and evolving tariff policies as sources of uncertainty affecting demand, revenue and profitability. Its filing states: “We are navigating through several external factors that create uncertainty and volatility in the operating environment, including, but not limited to: geopolitical dynamics, tax regulation, fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates and evolving tariff policies.”
Those risks operate through several channels. Tariffs can raise product costs or force price changes; currency moves can reduce the dollar value of overseas sales; geopolitics can disrupt sourcing or demand; and tax changes can alter earnings without changing unit sales. A high-quality comparison tests how sensitive each company is to these variables rather than assigning a generic risk label.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
adidas’s Q3 2026 release also demonstrates why temporary policy effects matter: a roughly €200 million tariff refund helped gross-margin improvement. The company’s updated outlook called for 9% to 10% currency-neutral revenue growth in 2026 and operating profit of around €2.5 billion after a planned €100 million fourth-quarter reinvestment. This is management guidance, not a guaranteed result. The reinvestment could support future demand, but it also means the quarter’s reported profit should not be extrapolated mechanically.
For either stock, write down a base case, a downside case and the indicators that would invalidate each case. Examples include sustained direct-to-consumer declines, rising markdowns, inventory accumulation, weakening local-currency demand, tariff changes or a margin rebound that disappears when a refund or logistics benefit lapses.
How should valuation enter a Nike-versus-adidas decision?
Valuation is the step that can reverse an operating-performance ranking. A faster-growing company can be a poor investment if its share price already discounts years of success; a slower company can offer better expected returns if the market price reflects excessive pessimism.
Use current share prices and synchronized financial data to calculate:
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
- Price-to-earnings: share price divided by diluted earnings per share for the same trailing or forward period.
- Free-cash-flow yield: free cash flow divided by market capitalization, with the cash-flow definition disclosed.
- Enterprise-value-to-operating-profit or EBITDA: enterprise value divided by a matching earnings measure, adjusted for leases and exceptional items consistently.
- Growth-adjusted comparisons: test whether the premium multiple is supported by durable revenue and margin assumptions rather than one quarter.
For adidas, specify which security you are buying: the German ordinary share or a U.S. depositary receipt. Check the receipt ratio, currency conversion, trading hours, fees, bid-ask spread and tax treatment before comparing its quoted price with Nike’s U.S.-listed common stock. A depositary receipt’s quoted price is not necessarily the same economic unit as one ordinary share.
Current prices and synchronized multiples were not established in the evidence for this article. Consequently, there is no supportable “cheaper stock” conclusion here. Update the calculation immediately before acting, and use the same date for both companies.
Also popular on Amazon
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
Which stock fits different investor priorities?
The answer depends on what you are trying to own, not just which recent number is larger.
| Priority | Evidence to emphasize | Questions to ask |
|---|---|---|
| Near-term turnaround potential | Nike’s flat fiscal 2026 sales, fiscal Q1 2027 decline, direct-channel weakness and gross-margin movement | Can demand and Nike Direct stabilize before inventory or markdown pressure worsens? |
| Recent growth momentum | adidas’s 2025 sales growth, 13% currency-neutral brand growth and preliminary Q3 2026 results | How much growth remains after the prior-year Yeezy comparison and temporary tariff refund? |
| Margin durability | Like-for-like gross and operating margins, excluding unusual refunds or logistics effects | Are gains coming from repeatable pricing and mix, or from costs and one-time items? |
| Income and capital returns | Dividends, repurchases, operating cash flow and net debt from matched filings | Are distributions funded by recurring free cash flow through a downturn? |
| Currency-aware diversification | Reporting currency, geographic revenue, hedging and the security’s trading currency | Would exchange-rate moves amplify or reduce the return in your home currency? |
What is a repeatable step-by-step comparison process?
- Choose a common date. Use the latest available filings for both companies and label every period, especially when one result is preliminary.
- Build a currency bridge. Show reported growth, currency-neutral growth where provided, and the exchange-rate assumption used for any conversion.
- Reconcile revenue drivers. Separate wholesale, direct, geography, category and discontinued-product effects.
- Normalize profit. Compare the same margin level and adjust for tariff refunds, restructuring, logistics benefits, unusual tax items and other disclosed exceptions.
- Check operating health. Review inventory, markdown exposure, receivables, payables and channel shifts.
- Review resilience. Pull debt, leases, cash, operating cash flow, capital expenditure and shareholder distributions from the full filings.
- Set valuation inputs. Use same-date prices, diluted share counts, trailing or forward earnings and a consistent free-cash-flow definition.
- Stress-test the thesis. Model weaker demand, adverse currency, tariff changes and margin normalization.
- Match the result to your plan. A five-year investor may tolerate a different mix of volatility and reinvestment than someone seeking near-term income.
What mistakes should you avoid?
- Comparing fiscal 2026 Nike directly with calendar 2025 adidas as if they were identical periods. Label the dates or align trailing twelve months.
- Mixing reported and currency-neutral growth. Keep the two measures in separate columns.
- Calling Nike’s gross margin higher than adidas’s operating margin. They are not comparable metrics.
- Ignoring discontinued Yeezy revenue. The prior adidas period included approximately €650 million of Yeezy sales; 2025 did not.
- Assuming a tariff refund is recurring profit. Treat the approximately €200 million adidas refund as a disclosed temporary contributor unless later filings show otherwise.
- Equating brand strength with shareholder returns. A strong brand can coexist with expensive valuation, weak execution or poor capital allocation.
- Using an ADR quote without checking the receipt ratio and currency. Compare economic units, not just ticker prices.
- Making a buy-or-sell call without current valuation and personal constraints. The same operating outlook can suit one investor and not another.
How we picked the comparison criteria
The criteria follow the evidence that can materially change an equity outcome: aligned reporting periods and currencies; reported versus currency-neutral growth; comparable margin measures; channel and inventory signals; balance-sheet and cash-flow resilience; temporary items; external risks; and valuation using the actual security being purchased. The framework deliberately avoids a winner based only on revenue size or one quarter’s growth.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallBottom line: how should you compare Nike and adidas shares?
Use Nike as a case study in a large-brand channel reset: fiscal 2026 revenue was flat, fiscal Q1 2027 revenue fell 4%, Nike Direct declined while wholesale grew, and gross margin improved to 42.8% in the quarter. Use adidas as a case study in stronger recent reported momentum: 2025 sales rose 5% in euros, operating margin reached 8.3%, and the company’s latest outlook called for 9% to 10% currency-neutral growth in 2026.
Neither set of facts identifies the better stock on its own. The decision requires same-date valuation, matched cash-flow and balance-sheet analysis, security-specific currency and trading details, and a clear view of how much volatility and how long a recovery you can accept. Treat management guidance as a scenario, not a promise, and revisit the comparison whenever a new filing changes the revenue, margin, inventory or cash-generation evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I compare Nike’s fiscal-year revenue with adidas’s calendar-year revenue?
You can use the figures for a broad size comparison, but not as a precise same-period growth test. Nike’s fiscal year ends in May, so a trailing-twelve-month or matched-quarter schedule gives a cleaner result than placing Nike fiscal 2026 beside adidas 2025 without a date warning.
What does adidas currency-neutral growth mean for an investor in dollars?
It is a management-defined view that removes the effect of exchange-rate translation from reported growth. A U.S.-dollar investor still experiences currency gains or losses in the share price and financial statements, so currency-neutral growth should supplement, not replace, reported euro results.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Is an adidas depositary receipt economically identical to the German ordinary share?
It represents an interest in the ordinary shares, but the receipt ratio, quotation currency, trading hours, fees and tax handling can differ. Confirm the receipt documentation and convert the price to the same number of underlying shares before calculating a relative valuation.
Why can Nike’s gross margin rise while revenue falls?
Revenue and gross margin respond to different drivers. Lower logistics costs, product mix or fewer markdowns can lift the gross-margin percentage temporarily even when unit demand and total sales are declining; later filings are needed to see whether the improvement persists.
How often should I refresh a Nike-versus-adidas comparison?
At minimum, update it after each quarterly filing and whenever either company changes guidance, reports a major tariff or currency event, or announces a material capital-allocation decision. Recalculate valuation with same-day prices rather than carrying an old multiple forward.
