Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Short answer: NASA’s published estimate put a Boeing Starliner seat at about $90 million and a SpaceX Crew Dragon seat at about $55 million. Boeing therefore came out roughly 64% more expensive, or 1.64 times the SpaceX estimate—not more than twice. These are calculated average program costs, not airline-style ticket prices or disclosed invoices.
What NASA’s numbers actually measure
The comparison comes from NASA’s Office of Inspector General (OIG), which estimated average seat costs using contract information available for its 2019 review, published in the report now hosted at NASA OIG’s Commercial Crew report.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
OIG assumed six round-trip International Space Station missions for each provider, with four astronauts per flight. That produces 24 assumed seats per contractor. It removed estimated development, test-flight and special-study costs from each contract total, then divided the remaining mission costs across those 24 seats.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →| Provider | OIG estimated average cost per seat | Relative result |
|---|---|---|
| Boeing Starliner | Approximately $90 million | — |
| SpaceX Crew Dragon | Approximately $55 million | — |
| Boeing compared with SpaceX | $90 million ÷ $55 million | About 1.64 times, or 64% higher |
For Boeing to be more than twice as expensive on that benchmark, its estimated seat cost would have needed to exceed $110 million. The OIG figures do not support that claim.
#1 Best Overall
- UNASSEMBLED HOBBY MODEL KIT – packed in an envelope with easy to follow instructions. Ideal for ages 14 and up.
- NO GLUE OR SOLDER NEEDED – Parts can be easily clipped from the metal sheets. Bundle includes tweezers, which are recommended for bending and twisting the connection tabs.
- BOEING CST-100 STARLINER – 1 Sheet Model with an easy difficulty level. Assembled Size: 1.97 (Diameter) x 2.17 H inches
- FROM STEEL SHEETS TO 3D – Pop out the pieces and connect using tabs and holes. Includes illustrated instructions.
- HIGHLY DETAILED ETCHED MODEL – Display your 3D model once completed - collect and build them all.
These were transportation contracts, not seat purchases
NASA did not buy isolated seats. Its Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) awards bundled spacecraft development, testing, certification, launch vehicles, mission operations, astronaut training, recovery and other services.
| 2014 CCtCap award | Value |
|---|---|
| Boeing | $4.2 billion |
| SpaceX | $2.6 billion |
| Combined original value | Up to $6.8 billion |
The original Boeing award was about 1.6 times SpaceX’s award, not more than twice. The Government Accountability Office describes the broader procurement and oversight context in its Commercial Crew report.
By June 2026, the two contracts together had grown above $8 billion, largely because NASA ordered additional missions through 2030. That later combined value is not a per-seat comparison and does not show how much NASA has already paid, how much remains obligated, or what an individual future seat will cost.
Rank #2
- HOBBY MODEL KIT – Unassembled model packed in an envelope with easy to follow instructions. Ideal for ages 14 and up.
- NO GLUE OR SOLDER NEEDED – Parts can be easily clipped from the metal sheets. Tweezers are the recommended tool for bending and twisting the connection tabs.
- BOEING CST-100 STARLINER – 1 Sheet Model with an easy difficulty level. Assembled Size: 1.97 (Diameter) x 2.17 H inches.
- FROM STEEL SHEETS TO 3D – Pop out the pieces and connect using tabs and holes. Includes illustrated instructions.
- HIGHLY DETAILED ETCHED MODEL – Display your 3D model once completed - collect and build them all.
Why Boeing’s estimate was higher
Different development starting points
Boeing argued that Starliner required development of a new crewed spacecraft, while SpaceX could draw on earlier Dragon cargo-vehicle work and NASA-funded predecessor development. Boeing’s response to the OIG analysis is available in its 2019 statement.
Different launch and spacecraft systems
Starliner flies on United Launch Alliance’s Atlas V and uses a different spacecraft, mission profile and recovery system from Crew Dragon, which launches on Falcon 9 and returns by water. Those engineering and operational choices create different cost structures; the available documents do not assign a single dollar amount to each design feature.
Capacity and the denominator
OIG divided mission costs among four astronaut seats. Boeing disputed that approach, saying Starliner’s cargo capability or a fifth passenger-equivalent should be reflected in the denominator. A cargo-equivalent capacity is not the same as a fifth NASA astronaut on every mission, so changing the denominator would produce a different estimate rather than establish a public ticket price.
Rank #3
- This kit includes our famous swivel stand for in-flight display
NASA evaluated more than price
In the 2014 competition, NASA recognized Boeing’s higher evaluated proposal price—approximately $3.01 billion versus SpaceX’s $1.75 billion—but judged both proposals among the best values. The evaluation considered technical and management approaches, past performance, mission utility and schedule as well as price, according to the GAO statement on the bid-protest decision.
What happened after the original awards
Schedule-gap and mission-pricing changes
Earlier OIG reporting criticized NASA’s decision to provide Boeing an additional $287.2 million associated with schedule-gap mitigation and mission planning. That figure belongs to the earlier OIG investigation; it should not automatically be labeled an overrun. Firm-fixed-price contracts can receive equitable adjustments when requirements, technical conditions or schedules change. NASA’s contracts also use milestone payments, with the 2019 OIG report stating that NASA generally could pay up to 75% of a mission’s cost before launch, subject to contractual conditions.
Terms such as contract ceiling, authorized value, obligated funds and actual disbursements describe different financial measures. A headline saying NASA “will pay” Boeing should identify which measure it means.
Rank #4
- Brand new box. Lakes pipes. Floor shifter. Black vinyl tires. Pad-printed tires. 352 cubic inch motor. Colorful decal artwork. Vintage style packaging. Officially licensed product. Chrome plated small parts. Contains 118 detailed parts. Dual carb and triple carb options. Paint and cement required (not included). Manufacturer's original unopened packaging. Parts molded in WHITE, unless otherwise indicated. "Chrome" trim detail can be striped on with silver paint.
Starliner’s certification gap
The most important current difference is operational performance. In its June 30, 2026 report, NASA OIG reported that SpaceX’s Crew Dragon and Falcon 9 had been human-rated since 2020 and had flown 12 crewed ISS missions. Boeing had completed two orbital flight tests and one crewed flight test but had not obtained human-rating certification for Starliner and Atlas V.
The 2024 crewed test experienced serious technical problems and was classified as a Type A mishap. OIG reported helium leaks and propulsion-system failures remained unresolved as of March 2026, while NASA could not say when testing and certification would be complete. Boeing therefore should not be described as already providing routine NASA crew transport.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Can any calculation justify “more than twice”?
Only by combining unlike figures. The phrase could appear if someone compares a later Boeing mission price with an older SpaceX average, includes development costs for one provider but not the other, uses four seats for one system and a different capacity denominator for the other, or treats an entire contract value as a seat price. Without naming the exact contracts, missions, dates and inclusions, the ratio is not meaningful.
Best Value
- From the Original Aurora Tooling which was updated by Monogram in the late 1970's
- Kit is molded in white with clear part for windshield
- Decals for Boeing Prototype
- Features detailed landing gear with 13.5 inch wingspan
- Skill Level 2. This package contains 36 parts. 1/96 scale model kit. Recommend black, gray and silver paint. Paint and glue sold separately. Recommended ages fourteen years and up. Made in USA.
The OIG’s like-for-like published estimate is the clearest public benchmark: approximately $90 million versus $55 million per seat. It is an average estimate, not a current 2026 invoice, and future mission economics could differ.
What taxpayers are really weighing
The policy question is broader than whether one seat costs more. NASA sought two independent U.S. crew-transportation providers to create competition, reduce dependence on a single company and provide resilience if one system were grounded. Boeing also pointed to Starliner’s land recovery and additional cargo or passenger-equivalent capability.
Those potential benefits must be weighed against delayed certification and the limited time remaining before the planned 2030 retirement of the ISS. SpaceX has delivered certified service; Boeing’s system had not reached certification in the latest OIG assessment. That ex- post performance changes the value calculation, but it does not prove that the original 2014 procurement decision was irrational or that the entire Boeing investment was wasted.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteQuick Recap
Bottom line on the headline
| Question | Best-supported answer |
|---|---|
| Is Boeing’s program more expensive? | Yes. Its original award was $4.2 billion versus $2.6 billion for SpaceX, and OIG estimated a higher average seat cost. |
| Is it more than twice as expensive per seat? | No. OIG estimated about $90 million versus $55 million—roughly 1.64 times. |
| Are those public ticket prices? | No. They are calculated average costs covering defined contract components and assumptions. |
| Is Starliner certified and flying routine NASA missions? | Not according to NASA OIG’s June 30, 2026 report. |
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
