The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Freddie Mac common stock (FMCC) has more upside only if a restructuring removes or sharply reduces Treasury’s senior claim and leaves substantial value for common shareholders. Freddie Mac junior preferred shares rank ahead of common and have a more defined route toward value through a return to par, resumed dividends, or an exchange near par—but they remain junior to Treasury and are not owed the dividends skipped since 2008. Both are speculative investments tied to decisions by Treasury and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), not ordinary income stocks.
The key distinction is payoff shape: common is the residual claim, so it could rise much further in a favorable release but can also be heavily diluted or left with little value. Junior preferred has contractual priority over common, but no assured exit, no current dividend, and a senior claim ahead of it that was about $150.4 billion by September 2026 according to secondary reports. Freddie Mac’s latest annual filing says conservatorship has no specified termination date.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
At a glance
| Name | Best for | Key spec | Platforms | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freddie Mac common (FMCC) | Investors seeking the largest potential residual upside if Treasury’s senior claim is removed or substantially reduced | Lowest-ranking equity claim; exposed to Treasury’s 79.9% warrant and potential additional dilution | OTCQB | November 2026 |
| Freddie Mac junior preferred (20 OTCQB classes) | Investors prioritizing contractual seniority over common and a possible recovery toward par or a resumed coupon | Non-cumulative; ranks behind Treasury senior preferred and ahead of common | OTCQB | November 2026 |
Which has more upside: FMCC common or junior preferred?
Common has the greater theoretical upside if Treasury gives up or sharply reduces its senior preferred claim. Junior preferred has a more bounded, par-based payoff and may fare better if that claim is affirmed or converted—but neither outcome is guaranteed.
Freddie Mac’s capital structure, from the perspective of a private shareholder, is not simply “common versus preferred.” Freddie Mac debt is ahead of equity, and Treasury’s senior preferred shares rank ahead of private junior preferred, which ranks ahead of common. The mortgage trusts’ assets are held for their beneficial owners; Freddie Mac’s 2025 Form 10-K says those assets cannot be used to satisfy Freddie Mac’s general creditors. The equity comparison is therefore about what remains after superior claims and the terms of any government-directed restructuring.
Popular on Amazon
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
| Question | Common | Junior preferred |
|---|---|---|
| What is the upside mechanism? | Residual value could rise substantially if Treasury’s senior claim is forgiven or deeply reduced and earnings accrue to common shareholders after recapitalization. | Potential return toward a stated par value, resumed contractual coupon payments, or an exchange near par, depending on the series and restructuring. |
| What sits ahead of it? | Debt, then Treasury senior preferred, then junior preferred. | Debt and Treasury senior preferred. |
| What is the main equity-specific hazard? | Warrant exercise, conversion of senior preferred into common, and new share issuance can sharply dilute existing holders. | Its seniority can be altered in a restructuring; it can remain unpaid or impaired, and a call or exchange at par can limit gains above par. |
| Does it pay cash now? | No dividend is being paid. | No dividend is being paid; skipped coupons are not an arrearage because the classes are non-cumulative. |
“More upside” is not the same as “better expected return.” Common could be worth several times a price near $4 in a favorable release scenario, but that outcome depends on the senior claim and dilution being addressed on favorable terms. Junior preferred may have a plausible path to a multiple of a deep-discount price if it returns toward par, yet its upside is more limited and depends on how its specific series is treated.
Those are scenario descriptions, not forecasts. For example, the GSE Exit Monitor’s model uses assumptions about earnings, valuation multiples, the warrant and restructuring; it is not a Freddie Mac projection. Similarly, Michael Burry’s October 2026 estimate that some junior preferred series might return roughly three to five times their price depends on a return to par through reinstated dividends or conversion. He was discussing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferreds together, not issuing a company forecast.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWhy is Treasury’s senior preferred claim so important?
It is larger than Freddie Mac’s reported book net worth, and its contractual treatment can determine whether either private equity class has meaningful value. Freddie Mac’s 2025 Form 10-K reported net worth of $70.4 billion at December 31, 2025, against a Treasury senior preferred liquidation preference of about $140.2 billion.
The 2025 filing also reported $10.7 billion of net income for the year, down 10% from 2024, and $23.3 billion in net revenues, down 3%. Those profits do not automatically accrue to common shareholders. Under the capital-retention arrangement described in the filing, Freddie Mac retains earnings to build capital, and increases in net worth are added to Treasury’s liquidation preference through the capital-reserve end date. Retaining earnings may help the company’s capital position, but by itself it does not create a direct distribution or a claim for existing common holders.
The annual filing put the liquidation preference at $140.248 billion at year-end 2025. Secondary reports cited Freddie Mac filings and releases for increases to $143.032 billion at March 31, 2026, $146.6 billion at June 30, and $150.4 billion at September 30. Treat the later figures as reported secondary readings rather than as figures independently confirmed here from the quarterly filings. They show why an equity investor must track not only Freddie Mac’s earnings, but also the senior preference that stands ahead of private shares.
Freddie Mac said its remaining Treasury funding commitment was also $140.2 billion at December 31, 2025. That is support available to cover a future net-worth deficit, not a shareholder fund or cash pool earmarked for a release. Separately, the company reported $119.7 billion in cumulative senior preferred cash dividends paid to Treasury. Those payments do not reduce the liquidation preference. The U.S. Treasury’s fiscal-year 2025 financial statements reported a $154.0 billion fair value for Freddie Mac’s senior preferred at September 30, 2025; that accounting fair value is not the same thing as the liquidation preference or a guaranteed payment to Treasury.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesIn the third quarter of 2026, 24/7 Wall St. reported net income of $3.235 billion and said $3.206 billion was added to Treasury’s liquidation preference, leaving $29 million attributed to common stockholders and earnings per share of $0.01. Those quarterly allocation figures are that publication’s report of the results. The mechanism is consistent with the annual filing’s description: earnings and retained net worth do not simply flow to common while Treasury’s preferred economics remain in place.
A low price-to-sales ratio does not settle the valuation question. Sales multiples do not account for the senior liquidation preference or the warrant. The relevant question is not simply whether Freddie Mac is profitable or looks inexpensive against a peer multiple; it is what equity claim survives the government’s chosen capital structure.
Also popular on Amazon
Are Freddie Mac preferred dividends cumulative?
No. Freddie Mac’s junior preferred classes are non-cumulative, so dividends skipped since 2008 do not accumulate as a debt or arrearage that must later be paid.
The Purchase Agreement also bars Freddie Mac, without Treasury’s prior written consent, from declaring or paying dividends on equity securities other than the senior preferred and warrant while the senior preferred remains outstanding. The conservator has directed the company during this period, and neither common nor junior preferred is currently paying a dividend. The 2025 Form 10-K said no dividend was payable to Treasury for the quarter ended December 31, 2025 because Freddie Mac’s net worth remained below its Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework requirement.
A preferred share’s stated coupon is therefore not the same as current income. It describes a contractual rate under the share’s terms, subject to authorization and the governing agreements. Multiplying a coupon by the years of suspended payments and treating the result as owed would incorrectly assume the shares are cumulative. Glen Bradford’s series guide puts it plainly: “There is no arrearage claim.”
Treasury’s own senior preferred dividend is also not currently being paid in cash. The 2021 amendment described in Treasury’s FY 2025 financial statements and Freddie Mac’s 10-K provides for capital retention until regulatory capital requirements, including buffers, are met. The company warns that senior preferred cash dividends could have to restart before it has built sufficient capital; once they resume, retained earnings may no longer build capital at the same pace.
How much can the Treasury warrant dilute FMCC?
The warrant gives Treasury the right to acquire 79.9% of Freddie Mac’s common stock on a fully diluted basis at a nominal exercise price. If exercised, it would substantially dilute existing common shareholders; Freddie Mac says so in its 2025 Form 10-K.
Freddie Mac reported 650,059,553 common shares outstanding as of January 31, 2026. The existing share count is not the right denominator for a post-release valuation if the warrant is exercised or new shares are issued. The company’s filing says it can raise up to $70 billion through common stock issuance and retain the proceeds as capital only after Treasury has exercised the warrant in full and pending material conservatorship-related litigation has been resolved or settled. Existing holders would then own about 20.1% of the common before any additional issuance under that provision.
The warrant was scheduled to expire September 7, 2028 unless extended. Treasury’s January 2, 2025 announcement said the parties were not extending it at that time, while Treasury expected a future extension if appropriate to avoid a disorderly or disruptive conservatorship exit. That is not the same as saying the warrant will expire unused, or that it will necessarily be exercised on a particular date.
Freddie Mac’s filing also distinguishes between the permitted capital raise and other equity issuance while Treasury’s senior preferred remains outstanding. Other cash equity issuance must be applied to reduce the liquidation preference, which cannot be paid below $1,000 per share before Treasury’s commitment ends. The warrant and the terms of new capital matter because a nominally large enterprise valuation can translate into a much smaller per-share value for current common holders.
Also popular on Amazon
What could happen to junior preferred in a restructuring?
Junior preferred could benefit if a recapitalization recognizes its liquidation preference, resumes dividends, or exchanges the shares for stock near par. But Treasury is senior to it, and the government could choose terms that do not deliver that outcome.
Freddie Mac’s 2025 Form 10-K cover identifies 20 classes of preferred stock registered for OTCQB trading and labels them non-cumulative. The share classes differ in coupon terms. The filing calls FMCCT a 6.42% non-cumulative perpetual preferred and FMCKJ a fixed-to-floating non-cumulative perpetual preferred. Series-level par amounts and series-letter identifications in the examples below come from Bradford’s investor guide, not from the 10-K cover.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
| Ticker | Coupon information on the 10-K cover |
|---|---|
| FMCCI | Not stated on cover |
| FMCKK | 5.00% |
| FMCCG | Not stated on cover |
| FMCCH | 5.10% |
| FMCCK | 5.79% |
| FMCCL | Not stated on cover |
| FMCCM | Not stated on cover |
| FMCCN | Not stated on cover |
| FMCCO | 5.81% |
| FMCCP | 6.00% |
| FMCCJ | Not stated on cover |
| FMCKP | 5.70% |
| FMCCS | Not stated on cover |
| FMCCT | 6.42% |
| FMCKO | 5.90% |
| FMCKM | 5.57% |
| FMCKN | 5.66% |
| FMCKL | 6.02% |
| FMCKI | 6.55% |
| FMCKJ | Fixed-to-floating |
“Not stated on cover” does not mean a class has no coupon; it means the cover-page list does not give a rate. Investors should check the applicable issue documents and current terms for the exact class, including its par value, fixed or variable formula, reset date, and any call provisions, rather than infer those details from the ticker.
Bradford’s guide identifies FMCKJ as Series Z and gives it a $25 par value, with an 8.08% recent reset shown as an illustration; he identifies FMCCT as Series T, with a $50 par value and 6.42% fixed coupon. He illustrates a $10 purchase price for FMCKJ and $16 for FMCCT, but those are examples, not live quotes or investment recommendations. A reset rate is not a permanent coupon, and a high coupon would not guarantee that a payment is resumed.
Three details can make preferred series perform differently:
- Par value: A share’s potential price recovery depends on its market price relative to its own par. A $25-par share and a $50-par share cannot be compared by nominal share price alone.
- Coupon formula: Fixed coupons remain stated rates; variable coupons reset under their terms. A past reset rate may not be the rate that applies later.
- Market yield and call terms: A coupon above the yield investors demand could support trading above par if payments resume. But these are perpetual issues, and the monitor describes the shares as already past optional call dates and redeemable at par. An above-par market price can therefore be capped by a call or exchange at par.
Liquidity and ownership concentration also matter. GSE Exit Monitor’s holder estimates show a large combined Capital Group stake in FMCKJ, approximately 47% in the monitor’s approximation. A concentrated series may react sharply to an exchange or restructuring announcement. That does not establish what any holder will do; it underscores why one preferred ticker is not interchangeable with another.
Recommended Free Tools
What are the main risks for each class?
Common bears the greater dilution and residual-value risk. Junior preferred ranks ahead of common, but it can still be impaired, left without income, or affected by a restructuring that changes its contractual position.
- Common dilution: Treasury’s 79.9% warrant, a possible conversion of Treasury’s senior preferred into common, and new equity issuance can all reduce current common holders’ ownership. A Treasury conversion could leave common with much less of the reorganized company even if the enterprise continues operating.
- Preference risk: If Treasury’s senior liquidation preference is affirmed, common is behind a claim larger than Freddie Mac’s reported year-end 2025 net worth. Junior preferred is also behind that claim, so priority does not make it equivalent to a bond or protect it from loss.
- Receivership risk: FHFA can place Freddie Mac into receivership at the Director’s discretion, consistent with the statute and Purchase Agreement. In a receivership, private equity may be impaired; the existence of a seniority order does not promise a recovery.
- Policy and amendment risk: Freddie Mac warns that the conservatorship, Purchase Agreement, warrant, and senior preferred materially limit common and preferred shareholder rights. Treasury and FHFA can amend the arrangements, potentially on terms adverse to private holders.
- No current income: Both classes have a zero current cash yield. Preferred has a stated coupon in its terms, but it is not currently being paid; common has no stated coupon.
- Time and trading risk: Conservatorship has no specified end date. Both common and preferred trade on OTCQB, not on a national exchange, and prices can move sharply or be difficult to transact at a desired price.
Freddie Mac’s filing says it is controlled by FHFA as conservator and “not managed to maximize stockholder returns.” It also says the board has no fiduciary duties to the company or its stockholders while conservatorship continues. The Supreme Court language quoted in the filing recognizes that a conservator may act for the public interest rather than in shareholders’ best interests. Shareholders should not assume that profitability or a market rally obliges the conservator to maximize their returns.
Also popular on Amazon
Both classes also depend on a long, uncertain policy process. The January 2, 2025 amendments restored Treasury’s consent rights for a non-receivership release and left the senior preferred economics in place. Treasury and FHFA described a methodical process involving public input and review of housing-market and financial-stability effects. That is a process, not an exit date. Freddie Mac states that it is uncertain whether or when it can retain or raise sufficient capital for an end to conservatorship, and that this may not happen for several years or at all.
Analyst and investor scenarios illustrate the disagreement, not a consensus forecast. GSE Exit Monitor’s bull-case worksheet assumes a senior-claim restructuring and uses a five-year average earnings figure of $11.24 billion, a 12-times multiple, and 3.23 billion fully diluted shares to derive a modeled $41.64 common price. Its base case is $31.23 under different restructuring assumptions. These are the monitor’s model outputs, not Freddie Mac targets. KBW’s April 2026 common-stock target, reported by HousingWire, was $8.50, and it identified capital, Treasury’s senior preferred, and the government guarantee as issues that must be addressed for privatization. The wide gap reflects different assumptions about policy outcomes and timing as much as about the operating business.
Investor statements also have incentives and context. Bill Ackman’s release thesis, reported by 24/7 Wall St. in November 2026, envisioned $500 billion of combined value for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and taxpayers receiving about 80% of it; those are his estimates, and Pershing Square held substantial positions in both companies. Burry, by contrast, said he had sold common and bought preferred, arguing that junior preferred could fare better if the senior claim is affirmed or converted. Neither position changes Freddie Mac’s contractual terms.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.When will Freddie Mac exit conservatorship?
No public filing or Treasury or FHFA release currently sets an exit date. Freddie Mac’s 2025 Form 10-K says, “Our future is uncertain, and the conservatorship has no specified termination date.”
An exit would require decisions well beyond a stock-price recovery. Treasury consent is required for a release outside mandatory receivership; the process includes public input and a financial-stability and market-impact review. Freddie Mac must also address capital requirements, the senior preferred, the warrant, litigation, and the nature of the government guarantee. Treasury’s January 2025 amendment did not forgive or convert the senior preferred, and it did not change the warrant’s stated expiration date.
In October 2026, GSE Exit Monitor reported that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said, “I would imagine that the next year, the year after, we will be tackling the ownership structure.” That reported comment points to work on ownership structure, not a promised release date or terms. A possible future policy discussion should not be treated as an announced timetable.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
There is also unresolved shareholder litigation. GSE Exit Monitor reported that a D.C. Circuit panel ruled in July 2026 in Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. FHFA, No. 25-5113, but the opinion and remedy were not independently reviewed for this article. The ruling therefore should not be read here as canceling Treasury’s liquidation preference or guaranteeing a shareholder recovery. The 10-K continues to describe the preference as increasing with net worth under the current contractual regime.
How should an investor decide between FMCC and a preferred series?
Start with the outcome you think is plausible, then test whether the security’s payoff matches it. Do not choose from a headline price target or compare a common share price with a preferred share price without adjusting for warrant dilution, par value, and the senior claim.
Also popular on Amazon
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
- Decide what you assume about Treasury’s claim. Forgiveness or a deep write-down is the most favorable broad setup for common. Affirmation or conversion can leave common highly diluted; it may make junior preferred relatively more attractive, though not safe.
- For common, model fully diluted ownership. Include the Treasury warrant and any new capital raise. A price target that uses the current share count can substantially overstate value if it ignores the warrant.
- For preferred, identify the exact issue terms. Verify ticker, par amount, coupon formula, reset terms, call provisions, and any exchange treatment in the issue documents. Do not infer series identity from the final ticker character; Bradford’s guide, for example, says FMCKJ is Series Z and flags FMCCJ’s series letter as unconfirmed in his tracking.
- Separate a coupon from an arrearage. A non-cumulative share does not accumulate skipped dividends. Estimate a future yield only under an explicit assumption that dividends are authorized and resume.
- Use dated prices and scenarios. The available data includes common prices at several different dates: about $5.57 on August 17, $4.69 on November 2, $4.36 for the week ending November 4, and about $3.96 on November 12. These observations are not one current quote and should not be averaged. No live November 13 tape for all preferred classes was collected.
- Account for the waiting period and trading venue. Neither security has a confirmed exit timetable or current cash yield. Both trade OTCQB; check current trading eligibility, liquidity, spreads, and order terms with a broker before acting.
A useful stress test is to ask what the position would be worth if conservatorship continues, if the senior claim remains intact, or if Treasury converts it into common. If the investment thesis only works with immediate forgiveness, a near-term release, or reinstated dividends, the thesis depends on a political decision that has not been announced.
What does the evidence support—and what remains uncertain?
The strongest public baseline is Freddie Mac’s 2025 Form 10-K and Treasury’s FY 2025 financial statements. They establish the company’s year-end 2025 net worth, senior preferred liquidation preference, capital-retention mechanism, lack of a specified conservatorship end date, and constraints on private shareholders. Treasury and FHFA’s January 2, 2025 releases establish that the amendments restored consent rights and described a process for any release.
Later 2026 preference figures and quarterly earnings allocations in this article come from secondary reports of Freddie Mac disclosures, not from direct review of the Q1, Q2, and Q3 2026 filings. Preferred prices were not captured as a live tape for all 20 classes on November 13, 2026. Accordingly, use those later figures as dated reported information, not as a substitute for current filings or executable market quotes.
These distinctions matter because several numbers commonly compared are not interchangeable: liquidation preference is not the same as carrying value, fair value, or cash dividends paid; the combined Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preference is not Freddie Mac’s alone; and an investor’s valuation model is not a company forecast. The Treasury’s $360.3 billion combined senior preferred figure at September 30, 2025, for example, covers both enterprises. The Freddie-specific year-end 2025 liquidation preference was $140.2 billion.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Freddie Mac preferred stock have a maturity date?
The 2025 Form 10-K describes FMCCT and FMCKJ as perpetual preferred classes, so they do not have an ordinary scheduled maturity date. Perpetual does not mean they must trade forever: the governing terms include redemption provisions, and a restructuring could establish a different exchange or settlement.
What does FMCKJ represent, and is the final letter the preferred series?
Bradford’s guide identifies FMCKJ as Series Z, while Freddie Mac’s 10-K cover identifies the ticker but does not state that series-letter mapping. The ticker’s final letter is not a reliable way to infer the legal series; check issue documents before comparing terms.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Is Freddie Mac common stock the same investment as Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities?
No. FMCC is an equity claim on Freddie Mac, while an agency mortgage-backed security represents an interest in mortgage cash flows through a trust. Freddie Mac’s 10-K says trust assets are held for their beneficial owners and cannot be used to satisfy Freddie Mac’s general creditors; an MBS is still not itself a U.S. government obligation.
