Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
For most investors seeking a liquid U.S. consumer-staples position, XLP is the practical default; VDC or FSTA make more sense if you want a broader index that includes smaller companies. None is a high-yield fund: November 2026 third-party distribution-yield figures for the plain-vanilla U.S. funds generally fall around 1.9% to 2.5%. An ETF spreads company-specific risk across a basket, but it does not diversify away the risks of concentrating in one sector. The best choice depends on whether you value trading liquidity, a longer list of holdings, equal weighting, or global exposure—not on a single yield or recent-return figure.
At a glance
| Name | Best for | Key spec | Assets / expense / yield | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) | A liquid, large-cap U.S. staples sleeve | About 35–38 S&P 500 staples companies; top 10 about 64% | About $15.0B; 0.08% gross expense ratio; third-party distribution yields about 2.37%–2.46% | Nov 2026 |
| Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) | Broader U.S. exposure with mid- and small-cap names | 104 holdings; MSCI US IMI 25/50 Consumer Staples index | About $8.3B; 0.09% working expense ratio; third-party yields about 1.94%–2.02% | Nov 2026 |
| Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) | Broader U.S. exposure at a fee matching XLP | 97 holdings; top 10 hold 65.60% of assets | About $1.57B; 0.08% expense ratio; 2.03% annual dividend yield on ETF Database | Nov 2026 |
| Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) | Reducing the largest companies’ weight within the sector | Equal-weighted S&P 500 staples exposure | About $270M; 0.40% expense ratio; November sources show 2.46%–2.75% yields | Nov 2026 |
| iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) | Adding non-U.S. staples companies | Global exposure; June 30 portfolio included 89 holdings | About $1.19B; about 0.38% on ETF.com; 2.25% yield on GuruFocus | Nov 2026 |
| iShares U.S. Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) | Investors who specifically want its different sector mix | 52 holdings; 13.88% health-care equipment and services | About $1.54B; 0.37% prospectus expense ratio; 2.31% 30-day SEC yield as of Oct. 31 | Nov 2026 |
Sources and dates differ by column: assets and fees are from issuer pages or the cited comparison databases; distribution-yield figures are not all calculated on the same basis. In particular, IYK’s SEC yield is standardized and should not be treated as identical to another fund’s trailing or indicated distribution yield. The XLP figures use State Street’s November 10 asset and gross-fee data and the November 11–12 third-party yield range; see State Street’s fund finder, ETF.com’s comparison, and the fund-specific pages linked below.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Which consumer staples dividend ETF is best for your needs?
There is no single best fund for every investor. Choose one U.S. cap-weighted fund for a basic sector tilt, then consider RSPS or KXI only if you have a specific reason to change the weighting method or geography.
- Choose XLP if you value scale, trading activity, and a very low published fee. State Street reported $14,955.51 million in assets and a 0.08% gross expense ratio on November 10, 2026. ETF Database listed average daily volume of about 13 million shares. XLP’s S&P 500 sector universe is narrower than VDC’s or FSTA’s, but it is the largest and most liquid fund in this shortlist.
- Choose VDC if you want a broader U.S. staples index, are comfortable with a modestly higher fee, and expect to hold rather than trade frequently. ETF.com listed 104 holdings, approximately $8.3 billion in assets, and a 0.09% expense ratio on November 10. Its underlying index is the MSCI US IMI 25/50 Consumer Staples index.
- Choose FSTA if you want a similar broad-index approach to VDC at a published 0.08% fee and do not need VDC’s asset base or trading volume. ETF Database listed 97 holdings and about $1.57 billion in assets on November 12. Its 0.08% fee is close to XLP’s, but its average trading volume is much lower.
- Consider RSPS if your specific concern is the dominance of the biggest companies in a market-cap-weighted staples fund. Its equal-weight approach changes the allocation inside the sector, but costs 0.40% and does not add other sectors or geographies.
- Consider KXI if you want non-U.S. staples companies such as Nestlé and Unilever in the same fund. It still owns Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble, and its higher fee, foreign exposure, and semi-annual distribution schedule are trade-offs.
- Consider IYK only deliberately if its particular index mix—including a substantial health-care equipment and services allocation—is what you want. It is not simply a cheaper or broader version of a pure staples fund.
This is a fit framework, not a ranking of past returns. XLP, VDC, and FSTA are highly similar U.S. sector bets: Macroaxis reports pairwise correlations versus XLP of 0.99 for VDC and FSTA. Owning all three does not meaningfully diversify the sector allocation; it adds overlapping positions and trading costs.
Popular on Amazon
- Ideal for Gifting
- Ideal for a bookworm
- Compact for travelling
What does a consumer staples ETF diversify—and what does it leave out?
A staples ETF diversifies company-specific risk, not sector risk. Instead of relying on one company’s dividend, earnings, or business outlook, the fund owns a group of companies tied to everyday consumer goods and services.
That difference matters if a company cuts its dividend, faces a lawsuit, or reports disappointing results. Such a problem does not automatically remove every other holding from an ETF. XLP, for example, includes exposure to retailers, household-product makers, beverages, packaged food, and tobacco companies. The other companies continue to matter even if one holding falters.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →But buying a sector ETF is a decision to overweight a particular slice of the market. It does not add the mix of industries found in a broad-market or diversified dividend portfolio. XLP’s top 10 holdings account for about 64% of its assets, and Walmart and Costco together represented roughly one-fifth of the fund in November 12 holdings data. A fund can own dozens of companies and still be concentrated in a few of them.
Broader holdings counts do not guarantee smaller positions in the biggest companies. FSTA had 97 holdings, yet ETF Database reported that 65.60% of its assets were in the top 10. VDC’s July 2026 holdings data put Walmart at 14.49%—higher than XLP’s November weight. Those dates are not directly comparable, but they illustrate the point: index universe and holdings count answer different questions from top-position concentration.
The funds also do not screen out tobacco by default. XLP includes large tobacco holdings, and the June 30, 2026 KXI portfolio included Philip Morris, British American Tobacco, and Altria. BlackRock says IYK does not seek to follow a sustainable, impact, or ESG investment strategy. Investors who want to exclude tobacco or other companies should check the current holdings and index rules rather than infer a screen from the “consumer staples” label.
How do XLP, VDC, and FSTA differ?
These are the shortlist’s core U.S. options, but they take different approaches to index breadth and trading scale. Their long-term return histories are broadly similar in the cited November comparison; the distinctions in index, fee, concentration, and liquidity are more useful for choosing among them.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →| Fund | Index universe | Holdings / concentration | Expense ratio | Scale and trading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLP | S&P 500 consumer staples companies | About 35–38 operating companies; top 10 about 64% | 0.08% gross, per State Street | About $15.0B in assets; ETF Database listed about 13M average daily shares |
| VDC | MSCI US IMI 25/50 Consumer Staples | 104 holdings on ETF.com’s Nov. 10 comparison | 0.09% working figure; some vendors show 0.10% | About $8.3B in assets; ETF.com average daily dollar volume $42.5M |
| FSTA | MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples 25/50 | 97 holdings; 65.60% in top 10 | 0.08% on ETF Database, ETF.com, and Dividend Vision | About $1.57B in assets; one-month average volume about 262,871 shares on ETF Database |
Fees and market data checked in November 2026. Expense-ratio vendors disagree by about one basis point on some funds; the figures above use the source and convention stated in the table.
XLP’s fee translates to about $8 per year for every $10,000 invested, before any brokerage charges or the effects of returns. The 0.09% working figure for VDC is about $9 per $10,000, a roughly $1 annual difference. A 0.08% expense ratio does not mean the ETF has no costs: bid-ask spreads and any brokerage charges can also affect an investor’s transaction.
Also popular on Amazon
Liquidity can matter more to a trader than to a long-term holder. ETF.com listed XLP’s average spread at 0.01% ($0.01) and VDC’s at 0.05% ($0.11); those are vendor figures and can change with market conditions. VDC’s dollar spread was wider in that comparison, while XLP’s scale and trading activity are substantially greater. FSTA is investable for individual investors, but its share volume is much lower than XLP’s; large orders deserve more attention to execution and limit prices.
The index names include “25/50” for VDC and FSTA and “RIC 22.5/45 Capped” for IYK. Those are index labels, not a complete description of each methodology. The methodology documents were not included in the cited materials, so this article does not support a detailed explanation of the cap arithmetic.
Expense-ratio listings are not perfectly consistent. State Street, ETF.com, and ETF Database put XLP at 0.08%, although a few data pages show 0.09%. The working figure for VDC is 0.09%, the majority reading across the cited comparison sources, while some print 0.10%; Vanguard’s product page was not reviewed for this comparison. ETF.com, ETF Database, and Dividend Vision list FSTA at 0.08%, while one screener shows 0.07%. Confirm current fees in the fund documents before investing.
How much income do these ETFs pay?
Plain-vanilla consumer staples ETFs are moderate-yield equity funds, not high-income products. November 2026 vendor readings for XLP span about 2.37% to 2.46%; VDC readings cluster around 1.94% to 2.02%; FSTA’s annual dividend yield was listed at 2.03% by ETF Database. The comparison is approximate because providers may use different yield definitions and update schedules.
For context, FinanceCharts listed SPY’s indicated dividend yield at 1.01% on November 11, 2026, while Dividend Vision’s November sector table put XLP at 2.37%, VDC at 1.94%, and utilities fund XLU at 2.83%. On those sources, staples yielded more than the broad-market figure but less than utilities. They also yielded much more than the technology-sector examples in Dividend Vision’s table, XLK at 0.51% and VGT at 0.52%.
Do not call every displayed dividend yield an SEC yield. BlackRock reported IYK’s 30-day SEC yield at 2.31% as of October 31, 2026 and its 12-month trailing yield at 2.42% on the same date. Those are separate measures. No issuer SEC yield for XLP, VDC, or FSTA was published in the cited materials, so their figures here are attributed third-party distribution or annual dividend yields, not standardized SEC yields.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsDividend frequency also affects cash-flow planning. BlackRock lists IYK as paying quarterly, while GuruFocus describes KXI’s distributions as semi-annual. A yield percentage does not promise a fixed dollar payment: distributions change with the dividends received from holdings, share price, and fund-level distributions. The sources reviewed do not establish a qualified-dividend percentage for any fund. ETF Database’s “Qualified dividends” label for FSTA is not a percentage or a guarantee about a future distribution.
Be especially cautious with unusually high screener results. XLSI, a different State Street premium-income ETF—not XLP—showed a 12.20% yield on FinanceCharts and had about $26 million in assets in November 2026. That number is not directly comparable with a plain equity fund’s dividend yield. A high distribution rate can reflect a different strategy and does not by itself show that the fund’s underlying companies pay a higher sustainable dividend.
Also popular on Amazon
What do IYK, KXI, and RSPS add?
These funds address narrower preferences than the core U.S. shortlist: a different sector mix, non-U.S. listings, or less reliance on the largest companies. Their additional exposure comes with higher fees, more specific risks, or both.
IYK: a different U.S. sector mix
BlackRock’s IYK had 52 holdings, a 0.37% prospectus expense ratio, and net assets of $1,544,790,617 on November 11, 2026. Its benchmark is the Russell 1000 Consumer Staples RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. On that date, BlackRock’s market-value sector breakdown showed 57.77% in food, beverage, and tobacco; 21.77% in household and personal products; 13.88% in health-care equipment and services; 6.43% in consumer staples distribution and retail; and 0.15% in cash and/or derivatives.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11That mix is a warning against buying IYK based on its name alone. Its staples-retail allocation was much smaller than the exposure to retailers in XLP, while the health-care allocation was substantial. BlackRock reported a 30-day median bid-ask spread of 0.01% and quarterly distributions. Its standardized yield was 2.31% as of October 31. If you want a conventional staples sector position, compare those trade-offs with XLP, VDC, and FSTA before accepting a fee several times higher.
IYK’s larger top holdings also show why a higher holdings count is not the same as lower concentration. The Motley Fool’s November 12 quote boxes listed Procter & Gamble at 14.22%, Coca-Cola at 13.61%, and Philip Morris at 11.00%. The three together were close to 39% of the fund. These are dated market weights, not permanent allocations.
KXI: global companies, global risks
KXI adds exposure to international consumer-staples companies, but it does not remove the U.S. mega-caps. A June 30, 2026 portfolio summarized by GuruFocus listed 89 holdings and top positions including Walmart at 8.83%, Costco at 7.38%, Procter & Gamble at 6.07%, Nestlé at 4.79%, and Unilever at 3.59%. That is the dated portfolio evidence available here; it should not be described as a November 12 holdings file.
ETF.com listed KXI’s expense ratio at 0.38% and assets at $1.19 billion on November 12. Other vendor readings range from 0.39% to 0.43%, and the fund’s BlackRock product page was not reviewed, so treat 0.38% as a comparison-site figure rather than a resolved prospectus-level fee. GuruFocus reported a 2.25% yield and semi-annual distributions. International holdings can add country, currency, and foreign-withholding considerations; they are not a free source of diversification.
Recommended Free Tools
RSPS: equal weight, not broad-market diversification
RSPS reweights consumer staples companies rather than letting market capitalization determine the entire allocation. Equal weighting can reduce the dominance of the largest names, which may suit an investor who already has substantial Walmart or Costco exposure elsewhere. It remains a consumer-staples sector fund, not a broad-market fund.
Dividend Vision listed RSPS at a 0.40% expense ratio, about $271 million in assets, and a 2.46% yield in November 2026. FinanceCharts listed a 2.75% yield and a 0.39% fee. The yield disagreement is unresolved. Either reading is higher than the cited VDC and FSTA readings, but the expense ratio is about five times XLP’s 0.08%. Equal weight is a design choice with a material cost, not an automatic dividend upgrade.
Also popular on Amazon
Should you hold a staples ETF alongside a broad dividend ETF?
Possibly, if your goal is an intentional consumer-staples tilt; the pairing is not redundant, but neither is it a complete portfolio. The ETF Overlap Tool reported that SCHD and XLP shared 19.2% of their portfolios by weight across nine holdings on November 12, 2026. That percentage is the tool’s holdings calculation, not a measure of how much your own account overlaps.
The nine common names were Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, PepsiCo, Altria, Target, Archer-Daniels-Midland, Kimberly-Clark, Hershey, and General Mills. XLP’s distinct holdings in the cited file included Walmart, Costco, Philip Morris, Colgate-Palmolive, Mondelez, and Monster. SCHD’s distinct top holdings included companies from health care, energy, and other sectors. In the tool’s comparison, SCHD’s top 10 accounted for about 42% of assets versus about 64% for XLP.
The practical reading is that adding XLP to a broad dividend fund increases consumer-staples exposure, rather than replacing the need for other sectors. ETF Overlap Tool describes the pair as largely complementary, but its diversification score is the tool’s own statistic. Both funds remain equity investments and can fall together during a broad market decline. Review your total holdings—including individual stocks—before adding a sector ETF, because overlap tools cannot account for every asset or personal constraint.
What risks should a dividend investor consider?
“Defensive” does not mean risk-free, immune to falling markets, or guaranteed to outperform. Staples companies may sell necessities, but their share prices can still decline, and the sector can lag when growth-oriented or cyclical businesses lead.
- Sector and market risk: Published beta figures vary by source and calculation period, but each is well below 1.0. Beta is not a promise about future volatility. Motley Fool’s September 2026 comparisons listed five-year maximum drawdowns of 16.3% for XLP and 16.5% for VDC; its October comparison listed 16.3% for XLP and 15.0% for IYK. These figures show that defensive positioning can still involve substantial declines.
- Concentration risk: XLP’s top 10 accounted for about 64% of the fund, and FSTA’s top 10 accounted for 65.60%, despite its 97 holdings. A handful of holdings can drive a large share of results.
- Trading and execution risk: XLP’s assets and volume are in a different league from FSTA, RSPS, and smaller niche funds. Market spreads can widen, particularly around volatile periods. Consider limit orders and check the live spread rather than assuming a historical average will hold for your trade.
- Valuation risk: ETF Database reported FSTA’s P/E at 25.37 on November 12, above its category and FactSet segment averages. BlackRock listed IYK’s P/E at 27.76 and price-to-book ratio at 4.47. These are source-specific calculations and are not directly interchangeable, but they are a reminder that “defensive” does not mean “cheap.” A roughly 2% yield alone does not establish that a fund is attractively valued.
- International risk in KXI: KXI adds non-U.S. listings and associated currency and withholding considerations while retaining large U.S. companies. Its global label does not make it a complete international allocation.
- Strategy mismatch: A premium-income product, a food-and-beverage specialty ETF, a momentum fund, and an equal-weight sector fund are not interchangeable with a plain staples index. Check the benchmark and the source of distributions before comparing headline yields.
For historical context, ETF BFF says XLP fell roughly 3% in 2022 while the S&P 500 fell 18%. That is an approximate claim from that comparison page, not an index-provider figure verified here. The useful lesson is directional, not a forecast: staples can fall less during some downturns and still lag when other sectors lead. The same source says staples outperformed during the 2020 COVID crash but supplies no percentage for that claim.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Which funds should not make a plain staples dividend shortlist?
A fund can appear in a consumer-staples screener without being a good match for a core dividend-sector position. The products below are excluded for specific differences in strategy, yield, or cost—not because a short-term return proves they will underperform in the future.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
- XLSI: State Street’s Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF is a separate fund from XLP. FinanceCharts showed a 12.20% yield and about $26 million in assets in November 2026; State Street listed a 0.35% gross expense ratio. Its premium-income strategy and small asset base make its distribution figure a poor apples-to-apples comparison with XLP’s equity dividend yield.
- FXG: The First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund had a 0.63% fee and $221.91 million in assets on ETF.com’s November 12 list. FinanceCharts showed about a 2% yield. The fee is far above the plain index funds’ and the cited sources do not establish a dividend advantage that justifies it for a core staples-income role.
- PBJ: The Invesco Food & Beverage ETF focuses on a narrower part of the sector. ETF.com listed a 0.61% fee and $88.98 million in assets; the available sources did not show a yield high enough to justify that fee over a broad staples fund.
- PSL: The Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Staples Momentum ETF is a momentum strategy, not an income-focused sector choice. ETF.com listed a 0.60% fee and FinanceCharts showed a 0.69% yield.
- GXPS: The Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF had a relatively low 0.15% fee and a strong three-month total return of 9.6% on ETF.com’s November 12 table, but FinanceCharts showed a 0.65% yield. Its recent result does not make it a natural pick for an article about dividend income.
- PSCC: The Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF can serve a small-cap satellite role, but it is not a core substitute for a broad staples fund. FinanceCharts listed $40.076 million in assets, a 0.29% fee, and a 1.80% yield on November 10.
ETF.com’s November 12 category page listed 23 U.S.-traded consumer non-cyclicals ETFs with $26.42 billion in assets and a 0.68% average expense ratio. That category average is not the fee an investor needs to pay for a basic index fund: niche, active, and other specialized products pull the average upward. Compare the fund’s actual strategy and costs rather than shopping by category-wide yield or fee averages.
How should you read recent performance comparisons?
Recent returns show that these funds have moved together, but they do not establish a durable winner. For a like-for-like comparison, ETF.com’s November 10, 2026 tool reports the following total returns; its three- and five-year figures are annualized.
Also popular on Amazon
- It can be a gift option
- Comes with secure packaging
- Helpful in various ways
| Window | VDC | IYK | XLP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 9.53% | 7.50% | 8.94% |
| 3 months | 7.82% | 6.66% | 7.48% |
| Year to date | 19.30% | 19.89% | 19.27% |
| 1 year | 21.19% | 20.32% | 21.75% |
| 3 years, annualized | 13.68% | 11.33% | 12.91% |
| 5 years, annualized | 8.07% | 7.34% | 7.37% |
ETF Database reported FSTA’s year-to-date return at 20.12%, one-year return at 20.93%, and annualized three- and five-year returns of 13.62% and 8.08%, respectively, on its November 12 page. These numbers put FSTA close to VDC on those windows. Differences among sources and dates matter: a September one-year figure should not be spliced into a November comparison after a strong intervening month. Past performance is not a forecast, and total return includes more than the cash yield.
There is also a long-window distinction between IYK and the pure U.S. staples funds. The Motley Fool’s October 1, 2026 article says XLP returned 98% over ten years and IYK 134% over the same period, while also stating both underperformed the S&P 500. That is the article’s stated historical comparison, not a November 12 factsheet result. IYK’s different sector mix may help explain why a longer history differs, but the cited article does not prove that this caused the return gap.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
How we picked the shortlist
The shortlist prioritizes funds that provide a recognizable consumer-staples exposure and have usable evidence on index universe, fee, holdings, yield, and assets. XLP, VDC, and FSTA lead because they represent the main choices between scale and broader U.S. index coverage at low published expense ratios. RSPS, KXI, and IYK are included as distinct-fit alternatives rather than as universal upgrades. The comparisons use November 2026 figures where available, identify whether yields are standardized or third-party distribution figures, and do not rank funds by a single recent return or an unusually high distribution rate.
For a whole dividend portfolio, start with broad exposure and use a staples ETF only if you intend to make a sector tilt. If you already hold individual staples companies, look at the ETF’s current top holdings and weights before adding it. For a single U.S. staples sleeve, choose one of XLP, VDC, or FSTA based on liquidity, index breadth, and fee—not all three.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are consumer staples dividend ETFs tax-efficient?
The available figures do not establish a qualified-dividend percentage for any fund, so a yield label cannot tell you how a particular distribution will be taxed. Tax treatment depends on the distribution and your circumstances; consult the fund’s tax documents and a qualified tax professional for account-specific guidance.
Does FSTA issue a K-1?
ETF Database’s FSTA tax line says “Distributes K1: No.” That is a source-specific classification for FSTA and should not be generalized as a tax statement about every ETF or every investor.
Can a consumer staples ETF replace cash or bonds?
No: these are equity funds, and the cited drawdown figures show that their share prices can fall meaningfully. Their defensive-sector characteristics do not make them principal-stable or a substitute for a cash reserve.
Does a consumer staples ETF pay dividends every month?
Not necessarily. The reviewed sources describe IYK as quarterly and KXI as semi-annual; check each fund’s current distribution schedule because a cash payment is not guaranteed on a fixed monthly cadence.
