During Barack Obama’s presidency, federal money supported financial stabilization, tax relief, state services, infrastructure, education and other programs. The 15 examples below are documented areas of spending or support—not a confirmed reconstruction of a particular original list. They also did not all work the same way: federal budgets include outlays, grants, loans, contracts, equity transactions and tax benefits, so “spent tax dollars on” is shorthand rather than a precise budget category.
Obama served from 2009 to 2017, but fiscal year 2009 began before his inauguration. Figures for that year therefore describe a transition year that included crisis-response measures, not spending solely attributable to his administration.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
How to read the 15 examples
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), commonly called the Recovery Act, is the central source for many of these examples. A 2016 White House fact sheet said the law provided more than $760 billion in fiscal support through tax cuts, investments, aid to states and direct assistance. A 2019 Government Accountability Office (GAO) retrospective described its estimated cost as more than $800 billion. These are figures from different source contexts; they should not be combined or treated as interchangeable final totals. White House, 2016; GAO, 2019.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallFor perspective, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported $108 billion in ARRA stimulus spending during FY2009 alone: $32 billion for Medicaid, $22 billion for unemployment benefits and $54 billion for other programs and activities. That one-year figure is not the total cost of the law. CBO, 2010
#1 Best Overall
15 documented areas of spending or support
1. Education programs, including Pell Grants
The White House’s account of the Recovery Act included education among the areas receiving investment. OMB’s archived FY2017 budget materials also discussed Pell Grants, including a proposed expansion and year-round availability. That FY2017 material describes a budget proposal; it should not be read as proof that the proposed changes were enacted or that a specific amount was actually spent. White House, 2016; OMB, FY2017 budget
2. Clean-energy investment
Clean energy was one of the Recovery Act’s named investment areas in the White House’s 2016 retrospective. The cited summary establishes the policy area, but does not provide a single clean-energy total suitable for assigning to this item. White House, 2016
3. Transportation infrastructure
The Recovery Act supported transportation infrastructure as part of its investment program. The White House’s summary names the area but does not state a standalone dollar amount for it. White House, 2016
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
4. Broadband Internet investment
Broadband was another named Recovery Act investment area. This refers to public support for broadband-related work, not a claim that the federal government itself built or operated every resulting network. White House, 2016
5. Federal Medicaid support to states
In FY2009, $32 billion of the $108 billion in ARRA stimulus spending reported by CBO went to Medicaid. The figure is for that fiscal year and that Recovery Act category, not the total federal Medicaid budget or the law’s lifetime Medicaid support. CBO, 2010
6. Help for states to retain teachers and first responders
The White House described Recovery Act support as helping states keep teachers and first responders employed. This was aid intended to support state and local services; it is not evidence that every jurisdiction preserved every job. White House, 2016
7. Direct assistance to families affected by the downturn
The White House included direct help to families hit hardest by the economic downturn in its account of the Recovery Act. This is a broad description of assistance, not a single program or a standalone spending total. White House, 2016
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →8. Unemployment benefits
CBO attributed $22 billion of FY2009 ARRA stimulus spending to unemployment benefits. This is a one-fiscal-year amount within the larger Recovery Act response, rather than a total for all unemployment benefits during the presidency. CBO, 2010
9. Recovery Act tax relief for families and businesses
The Recovery Act’s fiscal support included tax cuts as well as investments and direct assistance. A tax reduction can support household or business finances without appearing as a government cash purchase, so it should not be counted as if it were the same kind of outlay as a grant or contract. White House, 2016
10. The Making Work Pay tax credit
The White House’s 2016 account described Making Work Pay as a tax credit of up to $400 for individuals and $800 for couples, subject to eligibility. Those are maximum credit amounts, not proof that every taxpayer received them or a measure of total program cost. The administration also characterized the typical family’s tax cut over its first four years as $3,600; that is an administration claim about tax relief, not a direct-spending figure. White House, 2016
11. Financial-stability initiatives under TARP
Treasury’s FY2009 budget statement cited initiatives under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) among temporary crisis measures contributing to increased outlays. TARP was part of the government’s response to severe financial-market stress; describing it simply as money given away would obscure its financial-stability purpose and the distinct transactions involved. The cited statement does not establish a single final taxpayer-loss figure for this item. Treasury, FY2009 results statement
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches12. Preferred-stock support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Treasury’s FY2009 statement also cited a preferred-stock purchase agreement with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, intended to support mortgage-market credit availability. This was an equity-related financial transaction, not a conventional grant; the statement identifies it as a temporary crisis measure contributing to outlay growth. Treasury, FY2009 results statement
Best Value
13. Grants to state and local governments
GAO’s 2019 retrospective estimated approximately $219 billion in Recovery Act grants to state and local governments. It is a subset of the act’s assistance, not an additional amount to add to the overall cost estimate. GAO describes support across areas including health care, transportation, energy, housing and education. GAO, 2019
14. Recovery Act contracts and loans
Recovery Act funding also moved through contracts and loans, alongside grants, tax benefits and other forms of assistance. GAO’s oversight materials describe the varied mechanisms and recipients, which included federal agencies, state and local governments, businesses, nonprofits and individuals. A loan or contract is not equivalent to a grant: each has different terms and budget treatment. GAO, Recovery Act oversight; GAO, 2019
15. Proposed Pell Grant changes in the FY2017 budget
The Obama administration’s FY2017 budget proposed Pell Grant expansion and year-round availability. This belongs on a list of what the administration proposed to fund, not on a list of confirmed outlays absent evidence of enactment and actual spending. A presidential budget is a proposal; enacted appropriations and historical outlay data answer different questions. OMB, FY2017 budget; FY2017 budget documents
What these examples do—and do not—say about presidential spending
“What did Obama spend tax dollars on?” can refer to very different measures: a proposal in a president’s budget, money Congress enacted, federal outlays recorded in a fiscal year, or a retrospective estimate of a multi-year law’s cost. The examples above mix documented policy areas with distinct financial mechanisms, so they are not a ranked list of the largest expenditures and do not sum to a meaningful total.
For FY2009, Treasury cited TARP initiatives, the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred-stock agreement, and the Recovery Act as temporary measures contributing to outlay growth. Because that fiscal year began before Obama took office, those figures and measures belong to a transition-year context rather than a clean measure of spending initiated wholly during his presidency. Treasury, FY2009 results statement
OMB’s historical budget tables and records of enacted spending are more suitable than a president’s budget message for examining actual federal outlays. The FY2017 budget message asserted that federal deficits had fallen by nearly three-quarters since 2009; that is the administration’s characterization, not an independent audit finding. OMB, FY2017 budget; FY2017 budget documents
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
Recommended Free Tools
