Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
ZTE has not been publicly confirmed as having received a $1 billion bribery fine. Reuters reported on December 10, 2025, citing two people familiar with the matter, that China’s ZTE could pay more than $1 billion to resolve a U.S. investigation into alleged violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The amount, timing and terms of any settlement remained uncertain in the available reporting.
The reported investigation would be separate from ZTE’s earlier U.S. sanctions and export-control cases, which produced approximately $1.19 billion in 2017 and another $1 billion payment in 2018.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
LIVELY Jitterbug Smartphone for Seniors, No SIM Needed, Smart5 | $119.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Tracfone Motorola Moto G 2025, 64GB, Saphire Blue (Locked to | $49.88 | Buy on Amazon |
What is confirmed—and what is not
| Reported or confirmed | Not publicly confirmed in the available reporting |
|---|---|
| A U.S. foreign-bribery investigation was reportedly active. | A signed settlement agreement. |
| ZTE could pay more than $1 billion. | The final penalty amount. |
| The allegations reportedly date to 2018 and earlier. | A criminal charge, civil complaint or formal admission of wrongdoing. |
| South America and other regions were mentioned. | The specific countries, officials, contracts or payments involved. |
| Chinese government approval was reportedly required for a deal. | A new U.S. export ban or supplier restriction. |
The core report was published by Reuters and republished by Sahm Capital. U.S. agencies reportedly declined to confirm or deny an active enforcement matter. The report did not establish that ZTE had agreed to pay, that the Justice Department had filed charges, or that the company had admitted the alleged conduct.
What ZTE is reportedly being investigated for
According to the Reuters report, the Justice Department was investigating whether ZTE made payments to foreign officials to gain business advantages in South America and other regions. The alleged activity reportedly occurred in 2018 and earlier.
#1 Best Overall
- Only Compatible with Lively Phone Service: The Jitterbug Smart5 is only compatible with Lively phone service; plans include unlimited talk, text and 24/7 access to Lively’s caring team
- Simple Cell Phone: This is our simplest smartphone yet, with a pre-installed SIM card, larger 6.75” screen, easy-to-navigate menu, voice calling, real-time call captioning and Urgent Response button
- Help When You Need It: Once your new phone is activated with Lively, the Lively team is here to help if you want to learn more about your phone, need a ride, have a health concern, or an emergency
- Online Activation: Activate your phone online for easy setup, and for additional questions, call our customer service agents for questions about your service and phone
- Why Lively: Lively offers Jitterbug cell phones and Lively medical alert devices that can help seniors feel connected, safe and healthy
That description is narrower than saying ZTE was found to have bribed officials. The available material does not identify the officials, contracts or payment arrangements. It also does not establish whether the case includes related allegations involving agents, improper commissions, inaccurate accounting records, weak internal controls, concealment or obstruction.
Those can be separate legal theories under the FCPA, but they should not be treated as established facts in this investigation without a charging document, settlement or company admission.
What the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act covers
The FCPA generally prohibits companies subject to U.S. jurisdiction from offering or paying anything of value to foreign officials to obtain or retain business or secure an improper business advantage.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallCrashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteThe law also includes accounting provisions. Companies may face scrutiny over whether their books and records accurately reflect transactions and whether they maintain adequate internal accounting controls. As a result, an FCPA resolution can involve more than the alleged payment itself.
In ZTE’s case, however, the available reporting describes an investigation and a possible negotiated resolution—not an adjudicated FCPA violation.
Why a settlement could exceed $1 billion
The reported figure is a possible overall resolution, not necessarily a single fine. Depending on the facts and agencies involved, a settlement could include:
- Criminal penalties or forfeiture;
- Civil penalties;
- Disgorgement of profits or transaction-related benefits;
- Prejudgment interest;
- Credits for penalties paid to another agency or government;
- A deferred-prosecution or nonprosecution agreement;
- An independent compliance monitor; and
- New anti-bribery controls, audits and reporting obligations.
The final amount could therefore be materially higher or lower than the reported “more than $1 billion.” The structure of the deal could matter as much as its headline value, particularly if it imposes monitoring or restrictions affecting ZTE’s access to suppliers.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsHow this differs from ZTE’s earlier U.S. cases
The new report should not be confused with ZTE’s best-known U.S. enforcement actions. Those matters involved sanctions, export controls, obstruction and false statements—not a confirmed bribery penalty.
| Date | Matter | Amount or consequence |
|---|---|---|
| March 2017 | ZTE pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate U.S. sanctions by sending U.S.-origin goods to Iran, obstructing justice and making a material false statement. The company’s conduct also involved telecommunications equipment shipped to North Korea. | Approximately $1.19 billion across U.S. agencies. DOJ separately announced $430,488,798 in criminal fines and forfeiture; Commerce announced a $661 million BIS penalty, including $300 million suspended for seven years. Treasury’s OFAC settlement was $100,871,266. |
| April–July 2018 | Commerce activated a supplier denial order after determining that ZTE had made false statements about disciplining employees involved in the earlier violations. | ZTE agreed to pay $1 billion and place another $400 million in escrow as suspended penalty money. Management and compliance changes were required, and the supplier ban was later lifted. |
| December 2025 report | Reuters reported a possible DOJ investigation into alleged foreign bribery connected with winning telecom business. | ZTE could pay more than $1 billion. No final settlement was publicly confirmed in the available reporting. |
The Justice Department’s 2017 announcement describes the sanctions-related guilty plea, while the Commerce Department’s account details the broader interagency resolution. Neither describes that case as a bribery matter.
Rank #2
- Carrier: This phone is locked to Tracfone, which means this device can only be used on the Tracfone wireless network. Tracfone plan required, activating is easy, just 3 steps.
- DISPLAY: Immersive viewing on a 6.7-inch super-bright 120Hz display with powerful stereo speakers and Bass Boost for cinematic entertainment.
- CAMERA SYSTEM: Advanced 50MP Quad Pixel camera captures sharp, detailed photos and videos in any lighting condition
- PERFORMANCE: Lightning-fast 5G connectivity paired with a powerful processor and RAM Boost for smooth multitasking.
- BATTERY LIFE: Long-lasting 5000mAh battery with TurboPower charging technology delivers hours of power in minutes.
Could ZTE lose access to U.S. technology again?
That is a key risk, but there was no reported decision to impose a new denial order in the available material.
The 2018 episode shows why the issue matters. ZTE relies on U.S. components and technology for parts of its phones, servers and networking equipment, according to the Reuters report. In 2018, Commerce lifted the supplier ban only after ZTE completed the required payment and escrow arrangements. The agency’s announcements are available here and here.
A new bribery resolution could include compliance conditions, affect existing obligations or prompt additional Commerce scrutiny. But it would be inaccurate to say that the U.S. has decided to cut off ZTE’s suppliers again.
Potential financial and business consequences
If a settlement exceeding $1 billion is reached, ZTE could face a substantial cash outflow, legal costs, compliance spending and possible monitoring fees. The financial effect would depend on the final amount, payment schedule, accounting treatment and whether other penalties receive credit.
The operational consequences could be more important than the fine itself. Restrictions on U.S. chips, software or other components could disrupt product development and sales, increase substitution costs and complicate relationships with telecom customers. Those outcomes are possible risks, not announced consequences.
The company could also face reputational damage, tighter scrutiny of overseas agents and contracts, and limits on government business. The reported requirement for Chinese government approval adds another layer of uncertainty; the available report does not explain the precise legal mechanism or identify the approving authority.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →ZTE’s previous corruption-related reporting
Historical allegations should be kept separate from the reported 2025 investigation. A 2015 assessment by Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global’s Council on Ethics reportedly linked ZTE to corruption allegations in 18 countries and investigations in 10, including Algeria, the Philippines and Zambia. Those historical reports do not establish that the current U.S. investigation concerns each of those countries or allegations.
Separately, Reuters reported in 2020 that ZTE said it had not been notified of an alleged U.S. bribery investigation. That statement concerned an earlier report and should not be treated as ZTE’s confirmed response to the later 2025 account. The historical report is available through Investing.com.
Timeline
- March 2017: ZTE pleaded guilty in a U.S. sanctions and export-control case involving Iran, North Korea, obstruction and false statements. The combined resolution was approximately $1.19 billion.
- April 2018: Commerce activated a supplier denial order over alleged false statements concerning employee discipline.
- June–July 2018: ZTE agreed to a $1 billion payment and $400 million escrow arrangement, after which the supplier ban was lifted.
- December 2025: Reuters reported that ZTE might pay more than $1 billion to resolve a separate foreign-bribery investigation.
What readers should watch next
- An official DOJ announcement, indictment, complaint or settlement;
- A ZTE filing or formal statement;
- The final amount and whether it includes multiple agencies or credits;
- Any Commerce Department action involving the 2018 agreement or supplier access;
- Whether a compliance monitor or enhanced reporting program is imposed; and
- Whether Chinese authorities approve a proposed resolution.
The Bottom Line
Bottom line: ZTE reportedly may pay more than $1 billion to resolve a U.S. foreign-bribery investigation, but the available reporting does not show that a $1 billion penalty has been imposed or finalized. The potential FCPA case is separate from ZTE’s earlier sanctions and export-control settlements, and its biggest risk may be renewed scrutiny of the U.S. technology supplies on which parts of its business depend.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
