Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Samsung Electronics may be considering BOE as a supplier of LCD television panels and OLED smartphone panels, but no confirmed purchase agreement has been publicly established. The reported discussions followed a November 2025 settlement between BOE and Samsung Display over OLED patent and trade-secret litigation. They do not, by themselves, show that Samsung has resumed buying BOE panels, that BOE displays are returning to US-bound Galaxy phones, or that every US restriction has been removed.
What Samsung is reportedly considering
A December 26, 2025 report said Samsung Electronics and BOE had resumed high-level discussions about display supply. The reported proposal included as many as 10 million BOE LCD panels for Samsung televisions and possible BOE OLED panels for smartphones. The report also described involvement by BOE chairman Chen Yanshun and Samsung executives.
Those details remain reported rather than officially confirmed. The available reporting does not establish a signed contract, final price, delivery schedule, specific Galaxy or television models, regional allocation, or committed volume. “Considering” could describe exploratory negotiations, supplier qualification, pricing discussions, or a proposed order—not necessarily production shipments.
Source: Android Headlines’ report on the discussions.
#1 Best Overall
- Samsung’s 27” Odyssey OLED G6 Gaming Monitor is engineered for perfection with a QD-OLED Display featuring QHD resolution made to deliver high brightness and a wide range of colors for gameplay
- OLED Safeguard technology supports performance by actively helping to prevent burn-in with a thermal modulation system
- Glare Free Technology keeps screen clear of reflection from external light sources
- The Pantone Validated screen accurately reproduces 2100+ lifelike colors and 110+ skin tone shades
- HDR10 provides brighter highlights and nuanced shadows for added depth and more realistic scenes
Why this is not necessarily a contradiction
The story involves two different Samsung companies:
- Samsung Electronics sells Galaxy smartphones and Samsung televisions. Its device businesses have an incentive to control component costs, maintain supply flexibility, and negotiate with multiple vendors.
- Samsung Display manufactures display panels, owns display-related intellectual property, and pursued the BOE litigation.
A Samsung Electronics procurement decision would therefore not automatically mean that Samsung Display has abandoned its intellectual-property concerns. The companies can have different commercial objectives even within the same broader corporate group.
Samsung Electronics could also consider BOE for LCD television panels without using BOE OLED panels in phones. LCD and OLED involve different technologies, products, specifications, and legal risks. A possible TV-panel relationship would not prove that BOE OLED panels had been cleared for every smartphone or market.
The legal dispute behind the headline
Samsung Display’s dispute with BOE involved both patent-infringement claims and trade-secret allegations.
Patent claims
According to TechCrunch, Samsung Display filed a US International Trade Commission complaint against BOE in December 2022, alleging infringement of Samsung OLED patents. TechCrunch reported that an ITC ruling in March 2025 found BOE had infringed three Samsung Display OLED patents.
A USPTO filing also documents Samsung Display’s 2025 patent assertions against BOE and references related litigation in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
Trade-secret allegations
Samsung Display separately accused BOE of misappropriating confidential OLED manufacturing technology, including technology allegedly connected to former employees and manufacturing processes. TechCrunch reported that an ITC administrative-law judge issued a preliminary finding favorable to Samsung and recommended a lengthy US restriction.
Rank #2
- Ultrawide immersion for elite gameplay: Our expansive 34" QD-OLED monitor delivers seamless speed, and super smooth motion with intuitive function and connectivity.
- Sweeping visuals and color: Evolve your field of view with WQHD and an 1800R curve, combined with QD-OLED's incredible color range and clarity that easily immerses you in any world.
- Colorful clarity: Experience the full spectrum of color as intended with DCI-P3 99.3% color coverage and Delta E<2 color accuracy.
- Vast visuals: See every detail with VESA DisplayHDR TrueBlack 400, 1000 nits peak HDR brightness and infinite contrast ratio.
- Unrivaled speed: Adaptive sync technologies like NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and VESA AdaptiveSync make games feel effortlessly smooth.
These legal descriptions should not be collapsed into the statement that BOE simply “stole Samsung technology.” Samsung made the trade-secret allegations; the reported administrative finding and any later Commission action have distinct procedural meanings. A patent-infringement finding, a trade-secret finding, an administrative-law judge’s recommendation, an ITC Commission decision, and an effective exclusion order are not interchangeable.
What “blocking US sales” actually means
The phrase “blocking US sales” is too broad if it suggests that all BOE displays, all products containing BOE panels, or all BOE-made smartphones are universally banned in the United States.
US ITC exclusion proceedings generally concern the importation of specified covered articles. The exact scope depends on the investigation, asserted claims, named respondents, covered products, downstream products, and the language of any final order. A restriction may concern particular OLED panels or components that allegedly use the disputed technology.
BOE’s own US statement said that the relevant March 19, 2025 ITC ruling concerned Samsung Display’s investigation and that BOE had intervened after Samsung sought a general exclusion order. BOE described its position in a statement about fair competition; that statement should be read as BOE’s account, not as a neutral summary of every legal effect.
Source: BOE’s statement on the ITC ruling.
An import exclusion affecting a component is also not automatically the same as a ban on selling every finished device that contains that component. Importers, downstream products, exemptions, enforcement, and the wording of the final order matter. A panel that may be usable in one product or market may not be usable in a US-bound product if the relevant order covers it.
What the November 2025 settlement changed—and did not establish
Samsung Display and BOE reportedly agreed in November 2025 to settle their patent and trade-secret lawsuits and withdraw pending lawsuits. Samsung Display emphasized the importance of fair technological competition, but the companies did not disclose the settlement’s complete commercial and legal terms.
The public material does not establish whether the settlement:
Rank #3
- High-Performance QHD OLED Display: 26.5-inch QHD (2560 x 1440) TrueBlack Glossy WOLED gaming monitor with 240 Hz refresh rate and 0.03ms response time
- Advanced OLED Protection Technology: ASUS OLED Care Pro functions with Neo Proximity Sensor that precisely detects when the user is away, switching to a black screen to reduce the risk of burn-in
- Exceptional HDR and Color Accuracy: VESA DisplayHDR 400 True Black compliance, 99% DCI-P3 gamut, true 10-bit color, and Delta E < 2 color difference for astonishing HDR performance
- Intuitive Monitor Control Software: Exclusive ASUS DisplayWidget Center application allows users to easily access OLED Care Pro functions and adjust monitor settings using a mouse
- AI-Enhanced Gaming Features: ROG Gaming A.I technology with AI-powered features to enhance users' gaming experience
- included a patent or technology license;
- required royalties or another payment;
- removed, modified, or made any exclusion order moot;
- imposed geographic or product restrictions;
- authorized Samsung Electronics to buy BOE panels;
- resolved every government or private proceeding; or
- covered all Samsung-related entities in the same way.
TechCrunch reported that Samsung Display declined to comment on reports that BOE might pay royalties. Consequently, it would be premature to say that the settlement “lifted the ban” or automatically cleared BOE panels for US-bound Galaxy devices.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Source: TechCrunch’s settlement report.
Why Samsung Electronics might still want BOE
Cost and television economics
LCD panels remain important to television manufacturing, where large-screen component costs and high shipment volumes can materially affect margins. BOE may be able to compete aggressively on pricing, but the available evidence does not provide independent pricing, yield, defect-rate, or reliability data proving that BOE is cheaper or better for Samsung.
Supply diversification
Using another major supplier could reduce Samsung Electronics’ reliance on Samsung Display and provide additional negotiating leverage with other panel makers. Samsung could also reserve Samsung Display capacity for premium products or strategic customers while using external suppliers for selected televisions or phones.
Capacity and product segmentation
Samsung could use BOE panels only for particular price tiers, regions, or product families. Possible arrangements include BOE LCD supply for TVs, BOE OLED supply for lower-cost smartphones, or limited sourcing for markets where the legal and commercial conditions differ.
BOE’s manufacturing scale
BOE says it operates three Gen 6 flexible AMOLED production lines and has shipped more than 600 million OLED panels cumulatively. Those are company-reported figures, not independently audited measures of quality or superiority. BOE also presents OLED products for smartphones, laptops, vehicles, and other categories on its OLED product page.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →What BOE would gain
A supply relationship with Samsung Electronics could give BOE a high-profile global customer, improve capacity utilization, and provide further validation of its OLED manufacturing capabilities. It could also turn a legal settlement into a commercial relationship and reduce the risk of continuing litigation or restrictions.
BOE describes customers across several display categories, but the supplied material does not publicly identify Samsung as a current BOE customer. A reported discussion is therefore not proof of an existing Samsung–BOE supply contract.
Rank #4
- OLED Makes All The Difference: With a display of these mammoth-like proportions, everything must look good. The WQHD quantum dot OLED display with true 10Bit is obligated to offer stunning contrast, cinematic color. Image retention-refresh keeps the images from sticking.
- AMD FreeSync Premium Technology: Say “goodbye” to stuttering and tearing. With AMD FreeSync Premium, the monitor’s frames are synced with the graphics card’s frames, which eliminates screen tearing and provides the smoothest gaming experience.
- Fast and Furious: If you want seamless gameplay at ridiculous levels of speed, you’ve come to the right place. With an 240Hz refresh rate and 0.03ms (G to G) response time, your sessions will be fluid, unbroken and unmatched – with little to no ghosting.
- Brilliant Colors: With the DCI-P3 99% color gamut, Delta E<2, and HDR10, colors are practically bursting out of the screen. Enjoy the best imagery your games have to offer!
- Center of Vision: At 26.5-inches, the X27U is directly in your field of view. Considered a hallmark of eSports tournaments, this is the perfect size to gain an edge over your opponents. The addition of a ZeroFrame design also removes the bezels – giving you have even more visibly over every match and every movement your rivals make.
What this could mean for Galaxy phones and Samsung TVs
No specific consumer-facing change has been confirmed. If Samsung eventually qualifies BOE panels, several outcomes are possible:
- selected models could receive lower-cost panels;
- different suppliers could appear in different regions or device variants;
- BOE panels could be limited to midrange or lower-cost phones;
- Samsung could continue using Samsung Display panels in flagship phones;
- televisions could use BOE LCD panels without any change to Galaxy phones; or
- consumers might notice no difference because Samsung applies strict panel specifications, calibration, and quality controls.
Panel quality is not determined by supplier name alone. Brightness, color accuracy, power consumption, refresh behavior, durability, and lifespan depend on the exact panel generation, driver electronics, calibration, cover glass, firmware, and device design. A BOE panel is not automatically inferior, and a Samsung Display panel does not guarantee that every measured characteristic will be better.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallThere is currently no confirmed Galaxy model, television model, launch date, or regional SKU that can be identified as using BOE panels based on the supplied reporting. Different panel suppliers can also coexist within the same nominal model or product family.
What Samsung would have to evaluate
Before placing a meaningful order, Samsung Electronics would likely assess more than the quoted panel price:
- total landed cost, including logistics and tariffs;
- yield, defect rates, and quality consistency;
- brightness, color accuracy, power efficiency, and lifespan;
- LTPO or variable-refresh capability where required;
- foldable-panel reliability for foldable products;
- capacity, delivery reliability, and factory location;
- patent clearance, licensing, and royalty obligations;
- ability to supply US-bound products without exclusion-order exposure;
- quality-control processes across production lines;
- long-term technology support and roadmap; and
- geopolitical, reputational, and compliance risks.
The central trade-off is straightforward: external supply may lower costs and improve bargaining power, while Samsung Display may offer tighter control over premium specifications and intellectual-property strategy. A settlement can reduce litigation risk without eliminating every procurement or compliance question.
What remains unknown
The most important unanswered questions are whether Samsung Electronics signed an agreement, how many panels—if any—it ordered, which products and regions are involved, and whether any smartphone panels would be OLED variants covered by the earlier dispute.
Recommended Free Tools
The settlement’s licensing, royalty, geographic, and product terms are also undisclosed in the available sources. The current enforceability and scope of any US restriction cannot be inferred solely from the existence of a settlement. Those questions require the relevant ITC disposition, settlement documents, or a direct company announcement.
Bottom line
The evidence supports a narrower conclusion than the headline “Samsung Considers BOE OLED Displays After Blocking US Sales.” Samsung Electronics was reportedly discussing BOE LCD and OLED supply after Samsung Display and BOE settled major litigation. But the discussions were not publicly confirmed as a purchase order, and the US legal issue concerned specified covered products and import restrictions—not necessarily a blanket ban on every BOE display or finished device.
This is best understood as a possible post-settlement supply-chain realignment. It does not show that Samsung has abandoned Samsung Display, that BOE panels are already returning to US-bound Galaxy phones, or that consumers should expect an immediate change in Samsung products.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
