PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchSome links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Meta has not publicly abandoned Llama, but Llama no longer appears to be the whole plan. After Llama 4 drew a weaker reception than Meta seemed to expect, the company reorganized its AI effort around Meta Superintelligence Labs, recruited new leadership and committed enormous sums to computing infrastructure. The result is a strategic question for developers and investors alike: can Meta keep Llama’s open-model ecosystem while shifting its most ambitious work toward new, potentially less-open models?
That distinction matters. “Left behind” is a thesis about Llama’s place in Meta’s strategy—not proof that the company has stopped developing it. Meta may still release Llama models, while making a different model family and its consumer products the center of its AI push.
Llama’s original bargain: give away access to gain influence
Meta’s Llama strategy offered a different route to generative-AI relevance from selling access to a closed model through an API. By making model weights available under Meta’s terms, the company invited outside developers to download, adapt, host and build on its models. That could attract researchers and talent, encourage a wider ecosystem, and make open-weight AI a stronger alternative to proprietary systems.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteThere was also a defensive logic. If Meta could not immediately dominate the most capable models, it could still shape the tools and standards developers used. Wider adoption could benefit Meta even when a developer ran a model outside Meta’s own services. Mark Zuckerberg made the case that open AI could encourage adoption, broaden scrutiny and make Meta’s infrastructure more useful to others in Meta’s 2023 earnings remarks. The company later described making open AI competitive with closed models as a goal in its 2024 remarks.
#1 Best Overall
- CARDBOARD MONKENAUT — Get our best Gorilla Tag bundle yet with this Amazon exclusive deal. Purchase Meta Quest 3S to get exclusive items, including the Gorilla Space Program Suit and Helmet, plus 2,000 SHINY ROCKS.
- NO WIRES, MORE FUN — Break free from cords. Game, play and explore immersive worlds — untethered and without limits.
- 2X GRAPHICAL PROCESSING POWER — Enjoy lightning-fast load times and next-gen graphics for smooth gaming powered by the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processor.
- EXPERIENCE VIRTUAL REALITY — Take gaming to a new level and blend virtual objects with your physical space to experience two worlds at once in your VR headset.
- 2+ HOURS OF BATTERY LIFE — Charge less, play longer and stay in the action with an improved battery that keeps up. *Based on the graphic performance of the Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 platform vs the Meta Quest 2 platform.
That strategy could also support Meta’s own distribution. Meta AI can reach people through Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp and the web; the company does not need to sell model tokens to benefit if AI keeps users engaged or improves its products. But Llama’s public success and Meta’s ability to capture the resulting economic value are separate questions.
Why Llama 4 became a turning point
When Meta announced Scout and Maverick on April 5, 2025, it presented Llama 4 as a natively multimodal family built using a mixture-of-experts architecture. The announcement also described Behemoth as a much larger teacher model with 288 billion active parameters and 16 experts, and reported strong results on selected STEM benchmarks. Those specifications and benchmark results were Meta’s claims; they should not be mistaken for an independent, across-the-board verdict on model quality.
The gap between a confident launch narrative and market expectations is central to the Llama 4 story. Reporting described the release’s reception as poor and connected dissatisfaction with the models to Meta’s subsequent changes. That is evidence of disappointment, not a universal finding that every Llama 4 model was unusable or inferior in every task. Performance depends on the task, evaluation method, cost, latency and deployment needs; a model can lose ground on frontier reasoning yet remain useful because it is customizable or easier to run.
Behemoth added to the uncertainty. Meta introduced it as a teacher model, but the announcement did not amount to a public release of Behemoth for general use. Its promised role and reported capabilities therefore cannot be treated as the same thing as a model developers could download and evaluate. Delays and confusion around what was announced, released or available could also weaken confidence in the cadence of the Llama program.
The stakes were higher because Meta had positioned Llama as a leader in open models. A disappointing release can hurt more when a company has made leadership part of the brand. The fairest summary is that Llama 4 appears not to have met important market or internal expectations, as reported, while a definitive judgment requires comparisons across independent evaluations and specific use cases. Reuters reporting carried by CNA linked the new superintelligence effort to competitive pressure and the reaction to Llama 4.
Rank #2
- CARDBOARD MONKENAUT — Get our best Gorilla Tag bundle yet with this Amazon exclusive deal. Purchase Meta Quest 3 to get exclusive items, including the Gorilla Space Program Suit and Helmet, plus 2,000 SHINY ROCKS.
- NEARLY 30% LEAP IN RESOLUTION — Experience every thrill in breathtaking detail with sharp graphics and stunning 4K+ Infinite Display.
- NO WIRES, MORE FUN — Break free from cords. Game, play and explore in immersive worlds — untethered and without limits.
- 2X GRAPHICAL PROCESSING POWER — Enjoy lightning-fast load times and next-gen graphics for smooth gaming powered by the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processor.
- EXPERIENCE VIRTUAL REALITY — Blend virtual objects with your physical space and experience two worlds at once in your VR headset.
Meta Superintelligence Labs shifts the center of gravity
In 2025, Meta established Meta Superintelligence Labs, combining teams spanning foundations, products and Fundamental AI Research. In its second-quarter 2025 remarks, Meta said Alexandr Wang would lead the overall effort, Nat Friedman would lead AI products and applied research, and Shengjia Zhao would serve as chief scientist.
The organizational shift suggests a change in emphasis. The earlier Llama story centered on public model releases, broad developer adoption and an open-weight ecosystem. The new structure puts more visible weight on frontier capability, concentrated talent, speed and product integration. Models increasingly look like components of a wider Meta AI platform—not necessarily the public product or brand in their own right.
That does not automatically mean Meta’s research has become less ambitious or that Llama is over. It does mean the company is trying to coordinate research, products and infrastructure more tightly around an effort described in superintelligence terms. Centralization may help Meta make decisions faster; it may also intensify tension between long-horizon research and pressure to ship competitive products.
The Scale AI deal was a bet on more than a company
Meta invested $14.3 billion in Scale AI, a data and evaluation company, and brought its founder and CEO Alexandr Wang into its superintelligence effort. Reuters reported a transaction valuation of about $29 billion; the investment was also reported by the Associated Press and Reuters.
It would be too simple to say Meta bought Scale because Llama 4 failed. The deal can reasonably be read as an attempt to strengthen several capabilities at once: data operations, model evaluation, recruiting and execution. Wang’s appointment also signaled a shift toward a more centralized, delivery-focused approach. The deal does not establish which bottleneck—research, data, evaluation, product choices or organizational speed—was most responsible for the Llama 4 reception.
Rank #3
- NO WIRES, MORE FUN — Break free from cords. Game, play, exercise and explore immersive worlds — untethered and without limits.
- 2X GRAPHICAL PROCESSING POWER — Enjoy lightning-fast load times and next-gen graphics for smooth gaming powered by the SnapdragonTM XR2 Gen 2 processor.
- EXPERIENCE VIRTUAL REALITY — Take gaming to a new level and blend virtual objects with your physical space to experience two worlds at once.
- 2+ HOURS OF BATTERY LIFE — Charge less, play longer and stay in the action with an improved battery that keeps up.
- 33% MORE MEMORY — Elevate your play with 8GB of RAM. Upgraded memory delivers a next-level experience fueled by sharper graphics and more responsive performance.
Research culture under pressure
Meta’s AI work spans different traditions: FAIR’s longer-horizon research, teams responsible for shipping AI in consumer products, and a new frontier effort organized around rapid progress. Those missions can reinforce one another, but they can also compete for talent and attention. A lab focused on near-term product impact may not always prioritize the same work as researchers pursuing more fundamental questions.
Leadership departures have made that tension more visible. Joelle Pineau’s 2025 departure changed the continuity of Meta’s research leadership. Yann LeCun, Meta’s longtime chief AI scientist, later planned to leave to start a company pursuing his own approach to next-generation AI, according to Reuters reporting that cited the Financial Times. These departures are evidence of change, not proof that Meta’s technical work has declined or that Llama 4 caused any individual exit.
Meta also cut about 600 roles in the Superintelligence Labs organization, according to reported coverage. The reduction was framed as a move toward a smaller structure and faster decisions. It is not, by itself, evidence of an overall retreat: Meta has continued to invest heavily and hire in AI. The deeper question is whether a leaner, more centralized organization can keep the research talent and culture it needs while moving quickly enough to compete.
Is Meta abandoning open-source AI?
There is not enough evidence to say Meta has abandoned Llama or open-weight releases. Meta’s stated strategy has supported open AI, and reporting in April 2026 said the company planned open-source versions of future models. That is a reported plan, not a comprehensive official policy promising that every model—or Meta’s most capable model—will be released openly. Axios reported the expected open releases while describing Meta as trying to recover ground after Llama 4.
The terms matter:
- Open source has technical and legal implications that go beyond being able to use a model.
- Open weights means model parameters are available, but the training data, code and full process may not be, so independent reproduction may not be possible.
- Free access describes a price to the user, not whether the model is open.
- Open ecosystem describes a strategic approach; it does not establish that a model meets a formal definition of open source.
Meta has reasons to keep releasing open-weight models: developer adoption, ecosystem influence and the possibility that users build on Meta’s tools. It also has reasons to protect its most advanced systems: a frontier model kept proprietary could be a product advantage, especially if it powers a widely used assistant. Both approaches can coexist—Meta could release smaller open models while keeping its strongest system closed.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Rank #4
- NEARLY 30% LEAP IN RESOLUTION — Experience every thrill in breathtaking detail with sharp graphics and stunning 4K Infinite Display.
- NO WIRES, MORE FUN — Break free from cords. Play, explore and exercise in immersive worlds — untethered and without limits.
- 2X GRAPHICAL PROCESSING POWER — Enjoy lightning-fast load times and next-gen graphics for smooth gaming powered by the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processor.
- EXPERIENCE VIRTUAL REALITY — Blend virtual objects with your physical space and experience two worlds at once.
- 2+ HOURS OF BATTERY LIFE — Charge less, play longer and stay in the action with an improved battery that keeps up.
Meta’s first-quarter 2026 results confirmed a first model from Superintelligence Labs, while Reuters reported that it appeared under the Muse family name. A new family does not prove Llama has been discontinued; nor does it prove Muse is simply a rebrand or replacement. It does, however, make the strategic question more concrete: Llama may continue while losing its position as Meta’s most prominent frontier-model identity.
What “left behind” should mean
Model rankings alone cannot settle whether Llama is falling behind. A more useful assessment looks across several dimensions:
- Frontier capability: How do the latest models perform on independent evaluations relevant to real tasks—not only selected launch benchmarks?
- Release cadence: Is Meta shipping models reliably, or announcing systems that arrive late or remain unavailable?
- Developer adoption: Are teams choosing Llama over other open-weight families or proprietary APIs?
- Availability and terms: Can developers get the weights, tools and licenses they need, and are hosted options dependable?
- Product impact: Is Meta AI improving in apps, messaging, recommendations, advertising and hardware?
- Strategic centrality: Is Llama still the flagship, or one model family among several?
- Economic capture: Does Meta turn AI investment into engagement, advertising value, ecosystem control or other durable returns?
- Talent: Can Meta recruit and retain the people needed to build and improve competitive models?
Llama can lose a frontier benchmark race and remain valuable: its weights may underpin fine-tuned derivatives, local deployments and applications where control matters more than a top score. It can also be strategically less important to Meta even if developers continue using it. Those are different kinds of “falling behind.”
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Meta’s business case does not depend on selling model tokens
Meta can potentially monetize AI through more relevant advertising, stronger recommendations, higher engagement, assistants in messaging apps, AI-enabled business services and hardware such as AI glasses. The company has an unusually large consumer distribution network; users may encounter Meta AI without caring which model family powers it. That gives Meta a route to value even if another company’s model ranks higher on a particular evaluation.
The reverse is also true: distribution cannot guarantee that people will prefer Meta’s assistant, or that AI features will yield a measurable financial return. Meta’s 2025 results reported 3.58 billion average daily active people across its services in December 2025; its first-quarter 2026 results reported 3.56 billion for March 2026. Those figures show the scale of its audience, not how much AI generated revenue or caused engagement changes. Meta has said AI improvements increased time spent on its platforms, but the commercial question is whether such gains are durable and valuable enough to justify the cost.
For developers, the practical question is not whether Llama is the only model worth using. Compare capability on your own workload, licensing, inference cost, latency, hosting, fine-tuning support, data policies and operational requirements. Open weights may suit teams that need customization or local deployment; a managed model service may be preferable when operational simplicity, support and scaling matter more. Keep model interfaces and evaluations portable so a change in Meta’s roadmap does not force a costly rebuild.
Infrastructure is a huge input—not a guarantee
Meta spent $72.22 billion on capital expenditures in 2025. It first forecast $115 billion to $135 billion in 2026 capital expenditures, then raised that range to $125 billion to $145 billion in its first-quarter 2026 results. These are company-reported figures and forecasts; they describe spending plans, not proof that the spending will produce a leading model or a profitable product. See Meta’s full-year results and its SEC-filed first-quarter results.
Meta has described AI-optimized data centers, custom chips and a large infrastructure effort, including Hyperion, which the company said it expects to scale to 5 gigawatts over several years. It has also announced partnerships with NVIDIA and Arm while expanding its own MTIA silicon program: NVIDIA, Arm and MTIA. Together, these announcements point to a portfolio approach to computing rather than reliance on one hardware path.
Recommended Free Tools
More compute can support larger training runs, product deployment and inference at scale. It cannot, by itself, fix weak evaluations, poor data, unclear product goals or organizational disruption. Infrastructure can also become mismatched as models and architectures change. For investors, the test is whether this spending produces measurable benefits in advertising, engagement, consumer AI adoption or other businesses. For Meta, the potential reward is long-term capacity and leverage; the risk is spending heavily without a commensurate improvement in products or competitive position.
How investors and developers should read the shift
For investors, separate the AI model story from the AI business story. A weaker Llama release may signal execution problems, but it does not alone establish that Meta’s broader AI investment is failing. Watch whether the company can connect its spending to user behavior and business results, and whether strategic changes produce more consistent model releases.
For developers, Llama remains worth evaluating when open weights, customization or local control fit the project. But avoid treating today’s model brand as a guarantee of future cadence or support. Compare alternatives on the actual workload, confirm the applicable license and deployment terms, and keep prompts, test sets and infrastructure choices as portable as possible. The right choice may be a Llama model, another open-weight model or a managed service; the dossier provides no basis for a universal recommendation.
The verdict: demoted is more defensible than abandoned
Meta built Llama to make open-weight AI central to its competitive strategy. Llama 4’s weaker-than-expected reception, followed by the creation of Superintelligence Labs, new leadership, restructuring and vast infrastructure commitments, suggests the company is broadening—and possibly redirecting—that strategy. Llama may still matter as an open ecosystem and a useful model family. But it may no longer be the single public symbol of Meta’s most ambitious AI work.
The decisive test is whether Meta can regain technical credibility and ship reliably without giving up the adoption and developer trust that made Llama valuable. Until Meta clarifies the place of Llama alongside newer models, the accurate conclusion is not that Llama is dead. It is that the model family may be getting left behind as the centerpiece of Meta’s AI story.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
