Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Reuters reported that TSMC withdrew an approximately 40% price concession on advanced wafers supplied to Intel after then-CEO Pat Gelsinger made comments questioning Taiwan’s stability and Intel’s dependence on Taiwanese manufacturing. The alleged change would have raised Intel’s cost by roughly $9,200 per wafer, based on Reuters’ reported figures. However, neither Intel nor TSMC publicly confirmed the specific discount or that Gelsinger’s remarks caused it to end.
What Reuters reported
In a special report published October 29, 2024, Reuters said TSMC had offered Intel unusually favorable pricing for certain advanced manufacturing. Four people familiar with the agreement told Reuters that the discount was approximately 40% on 3-nanometer wafers priced at about $23,000 each.
Reuters reported that TSMC later stopped honoring the concession after Gelsinger made public comments about Taiwan and the risks of concentrating semiconductor production there. Intel then allegedly had to pay the full price, reducing the profitability of the affected business.
The report was based on interviews with roughly four dozen current and former Intel employees and executives, as well as internal videos, supplier documents and regulatory records. That is substantial reporting, but it is not the same as a publicly disclosed contract or an official explanation from either company.
#1 Best Overall
- The world’s fastest gaming processor, built on AMD ‘Zen5’ technology and Next Gen 3D V-Cache.
- 8 cores and 16 threads, delivering +~16% IPC uplift and great power efficiency
- 96MB L3 cache with better thermal performance vs. previous gen and allowing higher clock speeds, up to 5.2GHz
- Drop-in ready for proven Socket AM5 infrastructure
- Cooler not included
Read the Reuters report as syndicated by Investing.com.
How much was the reported discount worth?
| Item | Calculation | Approximate amount |
|---|---|---|
| Reported 3nm wafer price | As reported by Reuters | $23,000 |
| Reported discount | 40% of $23,000 | $9,200 |
| Estimated discounted price | $23,000 minus $9,200 | $13,800 |
| Estimated increase after discount ended | Difference between the two prices | $9,200 per wafer |
Those figures are arithmetic based on Reuters’ reported numbers, not independently disclosed contract terms. They do not establish Intel’s total financial loss. The available reporting does not specify how many wafers were covered, how long the discount applied, or whether the quoted amount represented Intel’s fully loaded cost.
Foundry economics can also involve volume commitments, capacity reservations, advance payments, yield adjustments, packaging, testing, masks and other contract-specific terms. The reported figure applies to the described 3nm wafer arrangement; it should not be generalized to every Intel product or to Intel’s entire relationship with TSMC.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWhat did Pat Gelsinger say about Taiwan?
Reuters identified two comments as relevant to the deterioration it described:
Rank #2
- AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gaming and Content Creation Processor
- Max. Boost Clock : Up to 5.7 GHz; Base Clock: 4.3 GHz
- Form Factor: Desktops , Boxed Processor
- Architecture: Zen 5; Former Codename: Granite Ridge AM5
- May 2021: Gelsinger said, “You don’t want all of your eggs in the basket of a Taiwan fab.”
- December 2021: While promoting investment in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing, he said, “Taiwan is not a stable place.”
The remarks were made months apart from one another and were framed around supply-chain concentration, geopolitical risk and Intel’s effort to rebuild domestic manufacturing. Reuters reported that the comments were followed by the alleged pricing change, but the publicly available account does not establish the exact date when TSMC changed the arrangement.
Why the comments could matter to TSMC
Taiwan is central to TSMC’s workforce, operations, corporate identity and economic importance. Saying that Taiwan is unstable, while arguing that companies should not rely too heavily on manufacturing there, can be interpreted as criticism of the environment in which TSMC built its global position.
The comments also created a business tension. Gelsinger was promoting Intel’s return to leading-edge manufacturing in the United States while Intel was simultaneously relying on TSMC for advanced production. From Intel’s perspective, using TSMC could address near-term product needs while its own manufacturing capabilities were being rebuilt. From TSMC’s perspective, public criticism from a major customer’s chief executive could be commercially and politically unhelpful.
Recommended Free Tools
That context makes the reported pricing consequence plausible as a business-risk story. It does not, by itself, prove that TSMC withdrew the discount because of the comments.
Rank #3
- Can deliver fast 100 plus FPS performance in the world's most popular games, discrete graphics card required
- 6 Cores and 12 processing threads, bundled with the AMD Wraith Stealth cooler
- 4.2 GHz Max Boost, unlocked for overclocking, 19 MB cache, DDR4-3200 support
- For the advanced Socket AM4 platform
Did TSMC really withdraw the discount because of Gelsinger’s remarks?
The most accurate answer is: Reuters reported that it did, based on people familiar with the agreement, but the companies did not publicly confirm the causal link.
TSMC did not publicly say that it withdrew the concession as a response to Gelsinger’s statements. Intel did not publicly confirm that it had received a 40% discount or attribute a price increase to those remarks. TSMC said Intel remained an important customer, while Intel described TSMC as an important partner and said the companies had a healthy business relationship.
That distinction matters. The reported consequence was a move from discounted pricing to full pricing—not the loss of access to TSMC or the termination of the relationship. Public diplomacy and private commercial terms can diverge, especially in a major supplier relationship, but readers should not treat anonymous-source reporting as an official contract disclosure.
What did Morris Chang reportedly think?
Reuters reported that TSMC founder Morris Chang publicly characterized Gelsinger as “a bit rude” after the comments.
Rank #4
- Pure gaming performance with smooth 100+ FPS in the world's most popular games
- 6 Cores and 12 processing threads, based on AMD "Zen 5" architecture
- 5.4 GHz Max Boost, unlocked for overclocking, 38 MB cache, DDR5-5600 support
- For the state-of-the-art Socket AM5 platform, can support PCIe 5.0 on select motherboards
- Cooler not included
That remark is evidence that the statements were sensitive at a personal and institutional level. It is not proof that TSMC formally retaliated, nor does it independently verify the alleged pricing decision.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why was Intel buying manufacturing from TSMC?
Intel historically designed and manufactured many of its own processors. During Gelsinger’s tenure, however, the company was trying to restore process-technology leadership while also outsourcing some production.
TSMC had the ability to manufacture advanced-node chips for external customers. Using TSMC therefore offered Intel access to leading-edge capacity while Intel worked through manufacturing delays and attempted to rebuild its own process capabilities.
The arrangement was more than a routine procurement deal. It exposed Intel to dependence on a supplier and region that its CEO was publicly arguing the company should not rely on too heavily. That contradiction is the central business lesson in the episode: diversification may be strategically sound, but criticizing a critical supplier while depending on its capacity can create relationship and pricing risks.
Best Value
- Processor provides dependable and fast execution of tasks with maximum efficiency.Graphics Frequency : 2200 MHZ.Number of CPU Cores : 8. Maximum Operating Temperature (Tjmax) : 89°C.
- Ryzen 7 product line processor for better usability and increased efficiency
- 5 nm process technology for reliable performance with maximum productivity
- Octa-core (8 Core) processor core allows multitasking with great reliability and fast processing speed
- 8 MB L2 plus 96 MB L3 cache memory provides excellent hit rate in short access time enabling improved system performance
What the episode does—and does not—prove
The reported episode illustrates how executive communication can affect relationships with strategically important suppliers. A 40% concession on high-end wafers, if the reported terms are accurate, could materially affect product margins. The episode also highlights the cost of pursuing geopolitical diversification while relying on the very supplier and region being criticized.
It does not prove that TSMC ended its relationship with Intel, that the comments were the sole cause of the pricing change, or that Intel lost billions of dollars. No verified wafer volume or contract duration is available for calculating an aggregate loss.
Nor does the episode explain Intel’s broader difficulties by itself. Reuters placed it alongside manufacturing delays, product-strategy problems and financial pressure during Gelsinger’s tenure. The narrower and better-supported conclusion is that the alleged loss of preferential pricing was one reported example of how strategic dependence and public messaging can collide.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Bottom line: Reuters reported that TSMC privately withdrew an approximately 40% discount on Intel’s 3nm wafers after Gelsinger’s Taiwan-related comments. At the reported $23,000 wafer price, that equals about $9,200 per wafer. The alleged cause and the total financial impact remain unconfirmed by Intel and TSMC.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
