Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Gamers Nexus (GN) accused NVIDIA of trying to influence hardware reviews in May 2025. GN said NVIDIA pushed reviewers to emphasize DLSS and Multi Frame Generation (MFG), connected access to engineers or interviews with coverage of those technologies, and handled preview access in ways GN considered unequal. GN then announced a broader investigation into alleged pressure on reviewers, partners, system integrators, and other businesses.
Those claims remain allegations attributed primarily to GN. The available material does not establish a court or regulator finding, prove that every NVIDIA employee or partner participated, or show that one later report resolved every issue raised in May.
What happened between Gamers Nexus and NVIDIA?
The dispute began with GN’s May 18, 2025 video, “NVIDIA’s Dirty Manipulation of Reviews”. GN alleged that NVIDIA representatives attempted to shape how reviews discussed DLSS and MFG 4X, NVIDIA’s frame-generation technology.
According to GN’s account, the issue was not simply that NVIDIA promoted its own features. Hardware companies routinely provide talking points, demonstrations, technical briefings, and recommended testing conditions. GN’s concern was whether access to interviews, engineers, drivers, or preview opportunities was being linked to favorable or specific editorial coverage.
#1 Best Overall
- AI Performance: 767 AI TOPS
- OC mode: 2632 MHz (OC mode)/ 2602 MHz (Default mode)
- Powered by the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture and DLSS 4
- Axial-tech fan design features a smaller fan hub that facilitates longer blades and a barrier ring that increases downward air pressure
- A 2.5-slot design maximizes compatibility and cooling efficiency for superior performance in small chassis
That distinction matters. A request to include a technology is not automatically coercion. The more serious question is whether refusing the request resulted in retaliation, loss of access, delayed information, or unequal treatment compared with other outlets.
Timeline of the controversy
| Date | Development |
|---|---|
| May 18, 2025 | GN publishes its video alleging pressure involving DLSS, MFG 4X, interviews, engineers, and review access. |
| May 20–22, 2025 | GN announces a broader investigation after reporting that system integrators, NVIDIA partners, and media members approached it at Computex with additional concerns. Notebookcheck reported the announcement. |
| June 3, 2025 | GN publishes its RTX 5060 review, describing the process as a “Forbidden Review.” |
| December 13, 2025 | GN publishes a major investigation into the AI GPU black market, export controls, intermediaries, and the movement of NVIDIA AI hardware into China. |
What did GN say it would investigate?
GN’s announced scope was broader than the original review dispute. It said it wanted to investigate allegations that NVIDIA might use its employees, technical access, drivers, interviews, or event access as leverage.
The channel also said system integrators, NVIDIA partners, and media members at Computex had described feeling threatened or pressured. GN wanted to determine whether such conduct was limited to particular account managers or reflected a wider company policy. The proposed scope included relationships involving:
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →- Hardware reviewers and technology media;
- System builders and integrators;
- NVIDIA board partners;
- Commercial partners and other businesses;
- Employees or representatives managing media and partner relationships.
Terms such as “shady” and “underhanded” came from GN’s framing or contemporary coverage. They should not be treated as independently established descriptions of NVIDIA’s conduct.
Rank #2
- Powered by the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture and DLSS 4
- Powered by GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
- Integrated with 16GB GDDR7 256bit memory interface
- PCIe 5.0
- WINDFORCE cooling system
What evidence was publicly presented?
The evidence should be separated by its source and level of verification.
Claims GN directly documented or described
- GN’s communications and interactions with NVIDIA;
- GN’s account of requests to emphasize DLSS and MFG 4X;
- GN’s account that access to interviews or NVIDIA engineers was connected to coverage;
- GN’s reporting about the RTX 5060 preview and driver process.
Claims reported from third parties
- Accounts from unnamed or unidentified system integrators;
- Reports from NVIDIA partners and media members at Computex;
- Assertions that some people felt threatened or feared commercial consequences.
These third-party claims may be important leads, but anonymous testimony is difficult for readers to independently audit. The available material does not establish how many businesses experienced similar treatment, whether the accounts were independently corroborated, or whether any alleged conduct came from a formal NVIDIA policy.
What has not been established
- That NVIDIA committed a statutory offense;
- That NVIDIA’s senior leadership approved the alleged tactics;
- That every NVIDIA employee, partner, or account manager participated;
- That NVIDIA’s review practices were universally different from those of other hardware companies;
- That the May allegations caused a measurable, industry-wide change in published reviews.
No regulator or court finding establishing the allegations is identified in the supplied material. NVIDIA’s official pages about DLSS 4 and Reflex 2 explain product technologies, but they do not resolve the dispute over editorial conduct.
Recommended Free Tools
Why the RTX 5060 dispute mattered
The RTX 5060 episode turned the abstract access dispute into a practical review problem. GN said some outlets received early preview access or drivers while qualified reviewers faced restrictions. It later published its own RTX 5060 testing in the June 3 video, “Forbidden Review: NVIDIA RTX 5060 GPU Benchmarks.”
Rank #3
- Powered by the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture and DLSS 4. System Requirements: Minimum 850W PSU with 16-pin 12V-2x6 (12VHPWR) connector required. Verify before purchasing.
- Military-grade components deliver rock-solid power and longer lifespan for ultimate durability. Compatibility: 348mm (13.7") length, 3.6 slots, 4.3 lbs. Confirm case clearance and slot spacing. GPU bracket included.
- Protective PCB coating helps protect against short circuits caused by moisture, dust, or debris
- 3.6-slot design with massive fin array optimized for airflow from three Axial-tech fans
- Phase-change GPU thermal pad helps ensure optimal thermal performance and longevity, outlasting traditional thermal paste for graphics cards under heavy loads
GN argued that the launch environment made independent testing more difficult and that the card needed to be assessed against older NVIDIA products and competing AMD hardware. Its comparisons included the RTX 4060, RTX 3060, RTX 2060, GTX 1060 6GB, RTX 5060 Ti 16GB, RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, and AMD’s RX 6700 XT.
That review is evidence of GN’s experience and testing process. It is not, by itself, proof that NVIDIA intentionally suppressed all unfavorable coverage. Nor does difficult or unequal access automatically prove that a product’s benchmark results were manipulated.
Why DLSS and frame generation complicate reviews
GPU buyers cannot evaluate modern performance using a single frame-rate number. A review may need to distinguish:
- Native rendering: Frames rendered at the game’s target resolution without upscaling.
- Upscaling: A lower-resolution render reconstructed to a higher output resolution.
- Frame generation: Additional frames generated between traditionally rendered frames.
- Latency: The delay between player input and visible response.
- Image quality: Artifacts, detail, motion clarity, and temporal stability.
- Frame-time consistency: Whether gameplay feels smooth rather than merely producing a high average FPS.
DLSS and MFG can materially change a displayed frame-rate figure, but a generated frame is not equivalent to a traditionally rendered frame in every respect. Readers should therefore look for native results, upscaling results, frame-time charts, latency measurements, image-quality observations, and clear disclosure of the settings used.
Rank #4
- Powered by the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture and DLSS 4
- Powered by GeForce RTX 5060
- Integrated with 8GB GDDR7 128bit memory interface
- PCIe 5.0
- WINDFORCE cooling system
What happened with GN’s later NVIDIA investigation?
GN subsequently produced substantial NVIDIA-related reporting, but the best-known later investigation addressed a different subject. Its December 13, 2025 report, “The NVIDIA AI GPU Black Market,” examined restricted AI GPUs, export controls, smuggling, middlemen, and the movement of hardware into China.
GN said it spent three weeks in Asia and conducted more than 12 hours of interviews with middlemen, suppliers, users, trading companies, professors, repair shops, and other participants in the restricted-GPU market. The reporting discussed shell companies, intermediaries, and the salvage or modification of defective hardware.
GN characterized NVIDIA as “playing all sides,” but that is GN’s interpretation and should be attributed as such. Evidence that intermediaries smuggled or redirected GPUs does not automatically prove that NVIDIA knowingly supplied illegal shipments or bears criminal liability for every downstream transaction.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →The December investigation demonstrates that GN continued examining NVIDIA-related business and geopolitical issues. It should not be presented as definitive confirmation of the May allegations about media manipulation. The two investigations concerned related corporate and hardware ecosystems, but not necessarily the same conduct.
Best Value
- Powered by the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture and DLSS 4 OC mode: 2640MHz/Default mode: 2610MHz (Boost Clock)
- Military-grade components deliver rock-solid power and longer lifespan for ultimate durability
- Protective PCB coating helps protect against short circuits caused by moisture, dust, or debris
- 3.125-slot design with massive fin array optimized for airflow from three Axial-tech fans
- Phase-change GPU thermal pad helps ensure optimal thermal performance and longevity, outlasting traditional thermal paste for graphics cards under heavy loads
What remains unresolved?
The public material supplied for this article does not provide a definitive answer to several important questions:
- Was there a written NVIDIA policy connecting access to specific review coverage?
- How many outlets or commercial partners received different treatment?
- Were individual employees acting independently or following company direction?
- Did outlets lose access or face retaliation after refusing NVIDIA’s requests?
- Did a regulator or court investigate the alleged media-relations practices?
- Did GN publish a final report tying all of the May allegations together?
Until those questions are answered with primary documents, named sources, corroborating accounts, or official findings, the most accurate description is a serious but incompletely resolved dispute.
How consumers should evaluate GPU reviews
- Prefer full reviews to launch previews. Previews can be useful, but they may rely on limited testing, pre-release drivers, or manufacturer-supplied data.
- Check the test conditions. Look for the GPU model, driver version, game version, resolution, quality preset, upscaling mode, and frame-generation setting.
- Separate native and generated performance. A high MFG result should not replace native-rendering data.
- Look beyond average FPS. Frame-time charts, latency, image quality, and consistency often reveal differences hidden by averages.
- Compare multiple independent outlets. Agreement across reviewers is stronger evidence than a single chart or preview.
- Read the disclosure page. Check whether the sample was supplied, whether the outlet uses affiliate links, whether sponsorship exists, and whether the manufacturer imposed editorial conditions.
- Treat access limitations as context, not automatic proof of wrongdoing. Restricted access may affect timeliness and completeness, but it does not alone establish intentional suppression.
Bottom line on the Gamers Nexus–NVIDIA dispute
GN alleged that NVIDIA attempted to influence review emphasis and used access to technical resources or launch materials as leverage. GN then announced a broader investigation into possible pressure involving reviewers, partners, system integrators, and other businesses.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
GN continued reporting on NVIDIA, including its RTX 5060 review and a later investigation into the AI GPU black market. However, the available evidence does not prove every May allegation, establish company-wide authorization, or show that the later black-market documentary resolved the original media-access dispute.
The controversy matters because review access can shape the information available to people spending hundreds or thousands of dollars on hardware. The responsible conclusion is neither that GN proved universal NVIDIA misconduct nor that the allegations can be dismissed as creator drama. Readers should follow the evidence, distinguish marketing claims from independent testing, and demand transparent methods from both manufacturers and reviewers.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
