Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
The Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, or AP) imposed a €30.5 million administrative fine on Clearview AI Inc. over its collection and use of personal and biometric facial data. The AP also ordered the company to stop relevant unlawful processing, remove unlawfully obtained data, comply with access requests, and appoint an EU representative where required.
The AP’s warning that directors could potentially face personal liability is separate from the corporate fine. The available decision does not show that Clearview’s CEO or another named executive was personally fined.
The short version
- Corporate fine: €30.5 million, imposed on Clearview AI Inc. The dollar equivalent was approximately $33 million to $33.7 million depending on the exchange-rate date.
- Conditional penalties: More than €5.1 million in additional exposure if Clearview failed to comply with the AP’s orders.
- Conduct at issue: Processing Dutch residents’ personal and biometric facial data without an adequate legal basis, inadequate transparency, failures involving access requests, and failure to appoint an EU representative.
- Executive warning: The AP said directors could potentially face liability if they knowingly allow GDPR violations to continue despite having the authority to stop them.
- Enforcement status: The AP’s decision says collection claims would be passed to the Dutch Central Judicial Collection Agency, but collection would not proceed until related legal proceedings had concluded. The available record does not establish that Clearview has paid the fine.
What happened, and when?
The formal AP decision is dated May 16, 2024. The action entered the wider news cycle on September 3, 2024, when the AP’s English-language announcement was published and widely reported. Those dates are important: September 3 was not the date on which the formal decision was issued.
The respondent was Clearview AI Inc., the U.S. company behind a searchable facial-image database and facial-recognition service identified in the decision as “Clearview for law-enforcement and public defenders.” The AP concluded that Clearview had processed data relating to people in the Netherlands in violation of multiple GDPR requirements.
#1 Best Overall
- [2 Pack] This product includes 2 pack privacy screen protectors.WORKS FOR iPhone 17e/16e/14/iPhone 13/13 Pro 6.1 Inch tempered glass screen protector.Featuring maximum protection from scratches, scrapes, and bumps.[Not for iPhone 16 6.1 inch, iPhone 13 mini 5.4 inch, iPhone 13 Pro Max/iPhone 14 Pro Max/iPhone 14 Plus 6.7 inch, iPhone 14 Pro 6.1 inch]
- Specialty: to enhance compatibility with most cases, the Tempered glass does not cover the entire screen. HD ultra-clear rounded glass for iPhone 17e/16e/14/iPhone 13/13 Pro is 99.99% touch-screen accurate.
- 99.99% High-definition clear hydrophobic and oleophobic screen coating protects against sweat and oil residue from fingerprints.
- High Privacy: Keeps your personal, private, and sensitive information hidden from strangers,screen is only visible to persons directly in front of screen.Good choose when you are in the bus,elevator,metro or other public occasions.(Note: Due to this privacy cover will darken the image to prevent the peeking eyes near you, you might need to turn your device display brightness up a bit when use it.)
- Online video installation instruction: Easiest Installation - removing dust and aligning it properly before actual installation,enjoy your screen as if it wasn't there.
The authoritative amount is €30.5 million. Reports converted that figure to roughly $33 million or $33.7 million, but the dollar value changes with exchange rates. The euro figure is therefore the more precise way to describe the penalty.
Read the AP’s formal decision for the underlying findings and orders.
What did the AP find unlawful?
The case was broader than a finding that Clearview had merely “scraped photos.” The AP examined the creation and operation of a searchable biometric database, the company’s legal basis for processing, its information provided to individuals, its handling of rights requests, and its European compliance structure.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
No adequate legal basis
Under GDPR Article 6, processing personal data generally requires a lawful basis. The AP found that Clearview did not have an adequate legal basis for the relevant processing of Dutch residents’ data.
Biometric data processing
Facial images can become biometric data when they are processed to enable the unique identification of an individual. Biometric data receives heightened protection under GDPR Article 9. The AP found violations involving the processing of this special category of personal data.
Insufficient transparency
The AP also found that Clearview did not provide information to data subjects in the way required by the GDPR’s transparency rules, including obligations associated with Articles 12 and 14. The issue was not simply whether images were publicly visible online; it was whether the company could lawfully collect and use them for this service while properly informing affected people.
Failures involving access requests
Two access requests were specifically at issue. The AP found that Clearview failed to respond properly and failed to facilitate Dutch residents’ exercise of their access rights under Article 15.
Rank #2
- Perfect Fit for iPhone 17 Pro Max：Engineered exclusively for iPhone 17 Pro Max with seamless edge-to-edge coverage, ensuring precise alignment and reliable full-screen protection.
- Advanced Privacy Protection：Features a 28° privacy filter with smooth 2.5D curved edges, preventing side glances in public. Your screen remains visible only to you—ideal for commuting, traveling, and crowded environments.
- Effortless Installation：Equipped with an auto dust-elimination tool that delivers a fast, accurate, and bubble-free application, keeping your screen perfectly clear with minimal effort.
- Military-Grade Protection：Made of nano-reinforced 9H tempered glass, SGS certified. Provides 5X stronger scratch resistance and proven durability, withstanding thousands of pressure and impact tests.
- Smudge & Fingerprint Resistant：Hydrophobic and oleophobic coating repels fingerprints, sweat, and oil—ensuring your screen stays clean, clear, and smooth to the touch.
This matters because the case was not only about the initial collection of images. Data-protection law also gives individuals rights to learn whether their data is being processed and, subject to the applicable rules, obtain information about that processing.
No required EU representative
The AP found that Clearview had failed to appoint an EU representative as required under Article 27. A representative requirement can apply to certain organizations outside the European Union that process personal data relating to people in the EU and fall within the GDPR’s territorial scope.
That finding does not mean every internet-facing AI company is automatically subject to the GDPR. Scope depends on the facts, including the nature of the processing, the people affected, and the applicable territorial and material provisions.
The European Data Protection Board’s summary lists the relevant GDPR provisions and the AP’s principal findings. The EDPB summarized the action; it did not itself impose the Dutch fine.
How was the €30.5 million fine divided?
The decision identifies two principal administrative-fine components:
| Component | Amount | Broad subject |
|---|---|---|
| Processing and biometric-data violations | €20 million | Lawfulness of processing and related biometric-data requirements |
| Access-rights violations | €10.5 million | Failures involving access requests and facilitating data-subject rights |
| Total | €30.5 million | Administrative fine imposed on Clearview AI Inc. |
This allocation should not be read as though every individual GDPR provision automatically received a separate €30.5 million penalty. The total reflects the fine components described in the decision.
The extra €5.1 million was conditional—not part of the original fine
The AP also issued four orders backed by penalties for non-compliance. They required Clearview to end and not resume the relevant violations, including by:
Rank #3
- [3 Pack] This product includes 3 pack privacy screen protectors.WORKS FOR iPhone 16/iPhone 15/iPhone 15 Pro 6.1 Inch tempered glass screen protector. Due to the rounded edge design of the iPhone 16/iPhone 15/iPhone 15 Pro and to enhance compatibility with most cases,the tempered glass screen protectors will be slightly smaller than the phone screen.[Not for iPhone 16e 6.1 inch, iPhone 15 Plus/iPhone 15 Pro Max/iPhone 16 Plus 6.7 inch,iPhone 16 Pro 6.3 inch,iPhone 16 Pro Max 6.9 inch]
- Specialty: HD rounded glass for iPhone 16/iPhone 15/iPhone 15 Pro 6.1 Inch is 99.99% touch-screen accurate.
- 99.99% High-definition hydrophobic and oleophobic screen coating protects against sweat and oil residue from fingerprints. Featuring maximum protection from scratches, scrapes, and bumps.
- High Privacy: Keeps your personal, private, and sensitive information hidden from strangers,screen is only visible to persons directly in front of screen.Good choose when you are in the bus,elevator,metro or other public occasions.(Note: Due to this privacy cover will darken the image to prevent the peeking eyes near you, you might need to turn your device display brightness up a bit when use it.)
- Online video installation instruction: Easiest Installation - removing dust and aligning it properly before actual installation,enjoy your screen as if it wasn't there.
- stopping the relevant processing of Dutch residents’ personal data;
- removing unlawfully obtained personal data;
- complying with data-subject access obligations;
- facilitating the exercise of access rights; and
- appointing an EU representative where Article 27 required one.
Continued non-compliance could expose Clearview to more than €5.1 million in additional penalties. These are conditional enforcement measures. They are not the same as a second administrative fine already imposed for the original conduct.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Combining the figures into a single “$38 million fine” would therefore be misleading. The accurate distinction is:
- €30.5 million: the administrative fine imposed on Clearview AI Inc.;
- more than €5.1 million: possible additional penalties tied to failure to comply with the orders; and
- possible director liability: a warning about personal responsibility under specified circumstances, not a personal fine shown in this decision.
What does the executive-liability warning mean?
The AP warned that directors could potentially face liability if they know GDPR violations are occurring, have the power to stop them, and deliberately fail to do so.
That is an important enforcement signal, but it should not be overstated. The evidence supports saying that the AP warned of possible director liability. It does not establish that the AP personally fined Clearview CEO Hoan Ton-That, prosecuted him, or imposed a separate penalty on another named executive.
The distinction is between:
- Corporate administrative liability: the €30.5 million fine imposed on Clearview AI Inc.; and
- Potential personal liability: a possible future consequence for directors who knowingly permit violations they have authority to stop.
Whether personal liability could actually be imposed would depend on the facts, the applicable legal process, the individual’s role and authority, and any separate proceeding. A warning is not the same as an established personal finding.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsWhy could the Netherlands act against a U.S. company?
Clearview’s incorporation in the United States did not, in the AP’s view, remove the processing from the GDPR’s reach. The authority focused on processing personal data relating to people in the Netherlands in connection with Clearview’s service.
GDPR jurisdiction and enforcement are fact-dependent. The case does not mean that every company anywhere in the world is automatically subject to the GDPR merely because its website can be viewed in Europe. Relevant questions include what data is processed, whose data it is, what the organization does with it, and whether the GDPR’s territorial and material-scope conditions are met.
Rank #4
- [3+3 Pack] This product includes 3 pack privacy screen protectors and 3 pack camera lens protectors with Installation Frame. Works For iPhone 16 [6.1 inch] tempered glass screen protector and camera lens protector. Featuring maximum protection from scratches, scrapes, and bumps. [Not for iPhone 16e 6.1 inch, iPhone 16 Pro 6.3 inch, iPhone 16 Pro Max 6.9 inch, iPhone 16 Plus 6.7 inch]
- Night shooting function: specially designed iPhone 16 6.1 Inch camera lens protective film. The camera lens protector adopts the new technology of "seamless" integration of augmented reality, with light transmittance and night shooting function, without the need to design the flash hole position, when the flash is turned on at night, the original quality of photos and videos can be restored.
- High Privacy: Keeps your personal, private, and sensitive information hidden from strangers, screen is only visible to persons directly in front of screen. Good choose when you are in the bus,elevator,metro or other public occasions. (Note: Due to this privacy cover will darken the image to prevent the peeking eyes near you, you might need to turn your device display brightness up a bit when use it.)
- Easiest Installation - Please watch our installation video tutorial before installation. Removing dust and aligning it properly with the help of the included installation frame before actual installation, enjoy your screen as if it wasn't there.
- 99.99% High-definition clear hydrophobic and oleophobic screen coating protects against sweat and oil residue from fingerprints, and enhance the visibility of the screen.
Nor did the decision amount to a general ban on facial-recognition technology. It addressed Clearview’s particular processing practices, database, service, and compliance failures.
Can the Netherlands collect the money?
Issuing a regulatory decision and collecting money from a foreign company are separate practical questions.
The AP’s decision says collection claims would be passed to the Dutch Central Judicial Collection Agency. It also says the AP would not proceed with collection of the fines until follow-up legal proceedings concerning the decision had concluded.
On the available record, it should not be stated that Clearview has paid the fine, that collection has been completed, or that the penalty is automatically collectible in the United States. The decision’s collection language shows that procedural developments and enforcement steps matter.
For the same reason, “the AP imposed” and “the AP ordered” are safer descriptions than saying the penalty is finally enforced or fully collected. The available sources do not establish the complete outcome of every possible challenge or collection proceeding.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What did Clearview say?
Clearview’s chief legal officer, Jack Mulcaire, described the decision as unlawful, lacking due process, and unenforceable, according to Associated Press reporting. Those are the company’s objections, not findings established by the AP decision.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →The company’s position is relevant to the procedural and enforcement questions, but it does not alter what the Dutch authority ordered or the distinction between the imposed fine and the conditional penalties.
Best Value
- 【Industry-Leading 100% Anti-Spy Privacy Protection】Designed for iPhone 17 Pro Max. Larger iPhone screens are easier for others to glance at, so UltraGlass uses patented, SEGI-certified 25° Blackout-3 optical technology to help block side views and keep emails, banking apps, and private content visible only to you—while keeping the front view HD-clear and comfortable through hours of scrolling and streaming.
- 【Unbreakable TOP 9H+ Glass, the Excellent 2nd Screen for Your iPhone】Boasting unparalleled shatter resistance and durability. And the core excellence is the top 9H+ tempered glass material, which is widely applied in aerospace and military fields for its ① Shatter-proof ② Scratch & Wear Resistance ③ Durability that is 7-8 times higher than other materials. Thus, UltraGlass builds a second tough screen for your iPhone 17 Pro Max.
- 【Industry NO.1 Military-Grade Shatterproof】Authorized by the International Military Standard with 50+ rigorous engineering tests of 220 lbs impact, 8,000+ drop tests, 25,000+ scratch tests, etc., its strength, toughness and durability perform NO.1 among all glass. By especially breaking the industry's record with a 12ft drop, the iPhone 17 Pro Max screen protector is ensured to be unbreakable from its surface to every edge and corner.
- 【Invisible Armor, 1:1 Full Covers the iPhone's Screen】Mimicking the iPhone's original screen design, it uses a 1:1 3D curved reinforced black edge that wraps around every curve — case friendly — while securing even the most vulnerable edges. Seamlessly blending with the iPhone 17 ProMax screen, it's virtually invisible and feels like the original screen while offering enhanced full-screen protection.
- 【0 Bubbles + 0 Dust + 0 Misaligned =100% Successful Installation】Includes everything you need with pioneering automatic positioning, dust removal, and absorption technology, making the installation just effortlessly easy in seconds. No bubbles, no troubles—transforming beginners into experts!
Why the case matters beyond Clearview
Publicly available images are not automatically free for any use
The dispute illustrates why the fact that an image can be viewed online does not by itself resolve whether it can be collected, indexed, enriched with facial-recognition technology, and used in a commercial or law-enforcement database. Regulators examine the purpose, legal basis, transparency, safeguards, and rights available to affected people.
Biometric databases create heightened compliance risk
Facial recognition can transform ordinary images into biometric identifiers. That can bring stricter legal requirements and greater consequences when an organization cannot show a lawful basis or fails to respect data-subject rights.
Rights handling is an operational issue
The access-request findings show that compliance is not limited to drafting a privacy notice. An organization needs practical systems for identifying requests, searching its data, responding within legal requirements, and explaining what it does with personal information.
Recommended Free Tools
Cross-border companies need a real enforcement strategy
A company can face a national supervisory authority even when it has no local headquarters. But the ability to issue an order is not identical to the ability to collect money quickly across borders. Companies operating internationally must consider both substantive compliance and the procedural consequences of ignoring a regulator.
Directors may face scrutiny over known violations
The AP’s warning signals that regulators may look beyond the company as an abstract legal entity when senior decision-makers knowingly tolerate ongoing violations they can stop. It does not establish automatic personal liability, but it raises the stakes for board-level oversight of high-risk data practices.
How this fits the wider Clearview enforcement history
Clearview has faced regulatory action in multiple jurisdictions. In the United Kingdom, the Information Commissioner’s Office fined the company £7.5 million in 2022 and issued an enforcement notice. In October 2025, the U.K. Upper Tribunal held that the regulator had jurisdictional grounds to proceed and remitted the matter for further proceedings, according to the ICO’s update.
That is comparative context, not a ruling on the Dutch decision. Penalties from different countries are not automatically cumulative or immediately collectible. Each action has its own appeals, jurisdictional questions, orders, and enforcement process.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteWhat remains unresolved?
The AP clearly imposed the €30.5 million corporate fine and issued compliance orders. The unresolved practical questions are different:
- What was the final outcome of follow-up legal proceedings concerning the decision?
- Was the fine ultimately collected?
- Did Clearview comply with the orders and avoid the additional conditional penalties?
- Was any separate personal-liability proceeding brought against a director?
Unless a later court or AP record answers those questions, the careful conclusion is that the Dutch regulator imposed a major corporate penalty and warned about possible director liability, while the available record does not establish full payment, completed collection, or a personal executive fine.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
