Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Citrix Systems announced an agreement to acquire privately held Ardence on December 20, 2006. Ardence developed software-streaming and real-time provisioning technology that could deliver operating-system and application images from centralized servers to desktops, servers, blades, and diskless PCs. Citrix completed the acquisition on January 5, 2007.
The purchase gave Citrix a provisioning layer that complemented its application-delivery business. Ardence’s technology later became the foundation for Citrix Provisioning Server, now documented as Citrix Provisioning.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Getting Started with Citrix Provisioning Services 7.0 | $24.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
Citrix XenDesktop Implementation: A Practical Guide for IT Professionals | $31.84 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
Troubleshooting Citrix XenApp® | $40.99 | Buy on Amazon |
What Citrix announced
Citrix announced a definitive agreement to acquire Ardence—not a licensing arrangement, partnership, or minority investment. The purchase price was not disclosed in the original announcement, and Citrix expected the transaction to close during the first quarter of 2007. The acquisition closed earlier than that forecast, on January 5, 2007.
Contemporary coverage described Ardence as a provider of real-time provisioning and software-streaming technology. Citrix said the deal would extend its application-delivery portfolio into on-demand provisioning of desktops, server images, and service-oriented-architecture objects. Computerworld’s announcement coverage and a contemporary reproduction of Citrix’s release provide the original context.
#1 Best Overall
What Ardence’s technology actually did
“Streaming” in this deal did not mean streaming video or other media. Ardence streamed software environments and disk images.
In practical terms, administrators could maintain a centrally managed virtual disk or operating-system image and provision it to a target machine over a network. The target could be a desktop, laptop, server, blade, or diskless PC. The operating system and applications could then run on the target hardware while being supplied from centralized resources.
- Centralized images: IT teams could manage standardized operating-system and application environments from a central location.
- Rapid deployment: New or reconfigured machines could receive an image instead of being installed individually.
- Hardware flexibility: The approach supported bare-metal and diskless provisioning scenarios.
- Operating-system support: Contemporary descriptions identified both Windows and Linux streaming capabilities.
This was different from Citrix’s traditional hosted application or session-delivery model. In a remote-session model, applications generally execute on a server and the user receives an interactive display. Ardence’s technology provisioned an operating system and software image to the target machine, allowing workloads to run locally. The two approaches could complement each other, but they were not the same technology.
Recommended Free Tools
Why Citrix wanted Ardence
Citrix already focused on delivering applications over networks. Ardence added a way to deliver and manage the underlying desktop and server environments themselves.
The fit was especially relevant to Citrix’s Dynamic Desktop Initiative, which sought more centralized and dynamically managed desktop environments. Citrix presented the combination as a way to improve IT agility, security, reliability, and flexibility. Those were strategic benefits claimed by the companies at the time, not independently measured results from the acquisition.
The technology also addressed a growing enterprise requirement: managing large fleets of standardized desktops and servers without maintaining every installation separately. Centralized provisioning could reduce repetitive administration and make image changes easier to distribute. It did not, however, eliminate the need for storage, networking, authentication, image maintenance, endpoint management, or capacity planning.
Citrix’s broader mid-2000s strategy
Ardence was part of Citrix’s effort to assemble a broader application-delivery and virtualization infrastructure portfolio. Contemporary reporting connected the transaction with Citrix acquisitions such as Reflectent Software and Orbital Data, which addressed different parts of monitoring and network or application delivery.
Citrix later acquired XenSource, adding server-virtualization and hypervisor technology. That distinction matters: Ardence supplied operating-system streaming and provisioning capabilities, while XenSource supplied a different server-virtualization layer. Ardence did not, by itself, create Citrix’s entire virtualization business.
Closing date and financial terms
The transaction has two important dates:
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| December 20, 2006 | Citrix announced the definitive agreement to acquire Ardence. The purchase price was undisclosed. |
| January 5, 2007 | Citrix completed the acquisition of Ardence Delaware Inc. and acquired all outstanding capital stock. |
Later SEC filings provide the transaction’s accounting detail. Citrix’s 2007 annual report recorded approximately $50.3 million in cash and approximately $1.4 million in acquisition-related costs, for total consideration of about $51.7 million. See the 2007 Form 10-K.
An earlier filing reported approximately $50.6 million paid to Ardence stockholders, about $2 million in transaction costs, and assumed equity awards. These figures should not be treated as contradictory headline prices: they reflect different reporting stages and accounting treatments. The original announcement itself did not disclose a purchase price.
Citrix expected Ardence to contribute approximately $15 million to $18 million in fiscal-2007 revenue, according to contemporary reporting and the transaction adviser. That was an expectation associated with the deal, not a later audited measure of its independent performance.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
From Ardence to Citrix Provisioning Server
The acquisition’s clearest product result appeared in 2007. Citrix released Citrix Provisioning Server, based on technology acquired from Ardence. Citrix described the product as enabling Windows desktops and server workloads to be virtualized on network storage and streamed on demand to x86 servers or PCs. The product integration was reported in Citrix’s 2007 Form 10-Q.
The standalone Ardence brand did not continue indefinitely. Citrix’s legacy product lifecycle matrix records end-of-life dates for Ardence product editions between 2008 and 2010. The technology’s lineage continued through Citrix Provisioning Server, later Citrix Provisioning Services, and ultimately Citrix Provisioning.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the technology meant operationally
The model offered meaningful advantages for organizations with large, relatively standardized environments:
Rank #3
- one master image could serve many machines;
- deployment and replacement could be faster than rebuilding each endpoint;
- software versions could be made more consistent across a fleet;
- diskless or bare-metal targets could be provisioned; and
- administrators could centralize important parts of desktop and server maintenance.
It also concentrated dependencies and risks. A network interruption could affect booting or continued operation. Streaming servers and shared storage needed enough capacity for simultaneous deployments and boots. Driver incompatibilities could make a common image unsuitable for heterogeneous hardware. A faulty master image could spread a bad update across many endpoints. Provisioning servers, databases, and storage also required appropriate isolation and security controls.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →In other words, Ardence reduced some forms of endpoint administration; it did not make infrastructure administration disappear. Centralization could improve control and consistency while also concentrating operational and security risk.
Modern product relevance
As of 2026, Citrix documentation describes Citrix Provisioning as software-streaming infrastructure that delivers patches, updates, and configuration information to multiple virtual-desktop endpoints through a shared desktop image. That is the clearest surviving product lineage from the Ardence acquisition.
The current product is not the same release, branding, or technical environment as Ardence’s 2006-era software. Current Citrix Provisioning 2603 documentation includes requirements such as server certificates, Secure Boot certificate changes, and additional TCP/UDP communication ports. Those requirements should not be projected backward as evidence of what Ardence required in 2006. The current documentation is useful for understanding the descendant product, not for reconstructing every detail of the original system.
Why the acquisition mattered
Citrix’s Ardence purchase was a strategic tuck-in acquisition. It helped Citrix move beyond delivering applications and toward delivering the desktop and server environments that supported those applications.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →The key historical outcome was not simply that Citrix bought a small software company. Ardence supplied a provisioning and operating-system-streaming layer that Citrix integrated into its broader delivery and virtualization strategy. That layer became Citrix Provisioning Server and, through later name and product changes, remains visible in Citrix’s provisioning portfolio.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
