Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchPC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
AWS remained the largest provider in the global cloud infrastructure-services market in calendar Q4 2024, with an estimated 30% share. Synergy Research Group put Microsoft at 21% and Google Cloud at 12% of a market worth about $90.6 billion. The figures show a substantial AWS lead alongside faster growth by its two closest rivals—not a market divided only among three companies.
How the Q4 2024 cloud market ranked
Synergy Research Group estimated that global cloud infrastructure-services spending reached $90.6 billion in October–December 2024, up 22% year over year. Its estimated shares put AWS first, Microsoft second and Google Cloud third. The implied dollar values below are calculated by applying those rounded shares to the market total; they are not vendor-reported revenue.
| Provider or group | Estimated share | Implied share of $90.6B | What the figure means |
|---|---|---|---|
| AWS | 30% | About $27.2B | Largest share; down from about 31% in Q4 2023 |
| Microsoft | 21% | About $19.0B | Second-largest share |
| Google Cloud | 12% | About $10.9B | Third-largest share |
| All other providers | 37% | About $33.5B | Combined remainder of a market that includes many providers |
The top three together represented about 63% of the overall infrastructure-services market. Synergy uses a separate public-cloud framing in which the top three accounted for about 68%; the percentages have different denominators and should not be compared as if they described the same market. Synergy’s market report also put full-year 2024 spending at $330.4 billion.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →What the $90.6 billion measures
This is a worldwide estimate for enterprise spending on infrastructure as a service (IaaS), platform as a service (PaaS) and hosted private-cloud services. It is not a tally of every product each company calls “cloud.” In particular, it is not equivalent to SaaS revenue, software licenses, consulting, advertising or a vendor’s entire cloud-related reporting segment.
#1 Best Overall
That distinction matters when comparing the market-share estimates with company earnings. Synergy classifies market activity across providers; company filings report revenue under each company’s accounting and segment definitions. An estimated share multiplied by the market total is a useful scale indicator, not a replacement for a financial statement.
AWS: still far ahead, despite a small share decline
AWS held an estimated 30% share, roughly nine percentage points ahead of Microsoft. Its share slipped about one point from Q4 2023, but that does not mean AWS revenue fell: the market expanded, and Amazon reported AWS revenue of about $28.8 billion for Q4 2024, up 19% year over year. Amazon also reported roughly $10.6 billion in AWS operating income for the quarter. Those are company-reported figures, distinct from Synergy’s market-share estimate. Amazon’s Q4 results provide the company’s reporting basis; CRN’s market-share coverage summarizes the estimates and comparisons.
AWS’s lead reflects a long-established cloud business, a broad service portfolio, a large installed base and a mature partner ecosystem. Its infrastructure spans compute, storage, databases, security and developer services, which can make it a natural fit for organizations already operating there. Strong operating income also gives Amazon resources to invest, although operating-income figures across companies are not perfectly comparable because segment definitions differ.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
AWS’s scale is not proof that it is the cheapest or technically best choice for every workload. Costs and performance depend on factors such as region, architecture, instance type, data movement and purchase commitments.
Microsoft: enterprise reach, with a measurement caveat
Synergy estimated Microsoft’s share at 21%. Azure benefits from its place in a wider Microsoft ecosystem that includes enterprise identity, security, developer tools, productivity software and hybrid-cloud offerings. Existing commercial relationships can simplify procurement for some organizations, and Microsoft can sell infrastructure alongside data, AI and business applications.
Microsoft does not disclose Azure infrastructure revenue as a standalone GAAP line item. Its “Microsoft Cloud” category covers multiple businesses, while “Azure and other cloud services” is a broader growth measure than infrastructure alone. For another common point of confusion, Microsoft’s FY2024 Q4 ended June 30, 2024—not December 31. In that fiscal quarter, Microsoft Cloud revenue was $36.8 billion, up 21%, and Azure and other cloud services grew 29%; neither figure is calendar Q4 2024 Azure revenue. Microsoft’s release identifies the period and categories.
Rank #3
There is an additional wrinkle in year-over-year share comparisons: CRN reported that Synergy changed the classification of some Microsoft revenue in 2024, moving some activity toward SaaS rather than IaaS/PaaS. That makes a simple comparison with earlier estimates less clean. The 21% share is best read as an analyst estimate under the classification used for this market snapshot, not as a Microsoft-reported Azure percentage.
Google Cloud: fastest growth among the three
Google Cloud’s estimated 12% share left it well behind AWS and Microsoft, but its reported growth was faster than theirs in the comparisons available here. Alphabet reported Google Cloud revenue of $11.955 billion in Q4 2024, up 30% year over year, and segment operating income of $2.093 billion. These are Google Cloud segment results, not a direct match for Synergy’s infrastructure-market estimate. Alphabet’s SEC-filed earnings exhibit gives the reported figures.
Google’s strengths include data analytics, machine learning, Kubernetes and AI infrastructure, including its own TPU accelerators. Those capabilities can appeal to organizations building data-intensive or AI-heavy systems. Its improved segment profitability also shows that growth was accompanied by operating income in this quarter; it does not establish that Google is more profitable than competitors on a like-for-like basis.
Why AI intensified the competition
Synergy attributed at least half of the increase in cloud-services revenue since ChatGPT launched to generative AI. That is Synergy’s assessment of the growth contribution, not evidence that AI accounts for half of all cloud revenue. AI can increase spending in several connected ways:
- Training and inference require compute capacity, including scarce accelerators.
- AI systems need high-performance networking and storage to move and process data.
- Managed model platforms and APIs create new PaaS demand.
- Cloud customers are adding AI features to existing applications and data services.
- GPU shortages can direct some workloads to specialist providers as well as hyperscalers.
AI is an accelerant, not the sole source of market growth. Migration and modernization, analytics, security, hybrid deployments and broader enterprise workload expansion also contribute. Smaller and specialist providers—including GPU-focused clouds such as CoreWeave—can win particular workloads even when they hold a small portion of the overall market.
What the rankings do—and do not—say
AWS was not displaced
AWS remained No. 1 with a sizable lead. A one-point estimated share decline in a growing market is evidence of relative share movement, not proof that AWS lost revenue, customers or leadership permanently.
The market was not a three-company contest
The remaining 37% included providers such as Alibaba, Oracle and IBM, as well as regional and specialist firms. CRN reported approximate shares of 4% for Alibaba, 3% for Oracle and about 2% each for IBM, Salesforce, Tencent and Huawei. Those rounded estimates illustrate why a three-provider leaderboard does not describe the whole market.
Market share is not profitability or buyer value
Share, reported revenue, growth, operating income and free cash flow answer different questions. None alone establishes which provider will have the lowest total cost or best performance for a particular workload.
How cloud buyers should use the comparison
The market ranking is context, not a recommendation. The practical choice depends on the workload and the organization’s existing technical and commercial position.
| Provider | Often worth evaluating when | Points to test carefully |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | You already run substantial AWS workloads, need a broad service catalog, or value its large partner ecosystem. | Service-level billing complexity, data-transfer charges, commitment terms and the cost controls needed to manage a large estate. |
| Azure | Your organization relies on Microsoft identity, Windows Server, SQL Server, Microsoft 365, GitHub or hybrid operations, or existing agreements shape procurement. | Product and licensing complexity, service-specific dependencies, and the distinction between broad Microsoft cloud categories and Azure infrastructure. |
| Google Cloud | Analytics, Kubernetes, machine learning or AI infrastructure is central and Google’s data and AI tooling suits the workload. | Skills availability, regional and procurement requirements, and the cost variability of AI workloads. |
Before committing, compare providers against the same workload assumptions rather than a generic price claim. Check region and data-residency needs, accelerator availability, storage and database choices, egress and inter-region traffic, identity integration, portability, support requirements, disaster recovery and the cost of reserved capacity or committed spend. Usage-based pricing and commitments can both make sense, but commitments trade flexibility for potentially lower unit costs.
For a real estimate, use each provider’s calculator with the same region, utilization, operating system, storage, traffic and support assumptions: AWS Pricing Calculator, Azure Pricing Calculator and Google Cloud Pricing Calculator. Treat free credits or trial allowances separately from recurring production costs.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
