The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
AT&T and Broadcom settled their VMware support lawsuit in December 2024, after announcing a settlement-in-principle the previous month. The terms were not made public, and the case ended without a public ruling on whether Broadcom could override AT&T’s claimed contractual right to renew support for perpetual VMware licenses. The dispute is a useful warning for organizations facing software-renewal changes—but it does not establish a universal right for VMware customers to keep legacy support.
What happened—and when
AT&T Services sued Broadcom and VMware in New York Supreme Court on August 29, 2024. The case, index number 654490/2024, concerned AT&T’s existing VMware licenses and its claimed rights to renew support under earlier agreements. The complaint is available through the New York courts.
In November 2024, the parties told the court they had reached a settlement-in-principle and asked for more time to document it. On December 13, counsel informed the court that the action had been settled and that the parties intended to submit a stipulation of discontinuance. The settlement details were not disclosed in the public reporting. TechTarget’s settlement report describes the later development; the November settlement-in-principle was reported here.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| November 2023 | Broadcom completed its roughly $61 billion acquisition of VMware. |
| August 29, 2024 | AT&T filed suit in New York. |
| October 2024 | The court ordered interim support protection while the case proceeded and encouraged a practical resolution. |
| November 21–22, 2024 | The parties reported a settlement-in-principle. |
| December 13, 2024 | Counsel said the parties had settled and intended to file a discontinuance. |
That timeline matters: “near settlement” describes the November stage, not the current status. The public information cited here does not establish the settlement’s commercial terms or a later judicial decision on the contract dispute.
#1 Best Overall
- HP Proliant DL360 G9 4-Bay LFF Server | 2x E5-2695v4 2.10GHz 18-Core CPU (36-Cores Total)
- 256GB DDR4 RAM | 4x 4TB 7.2K SATA 3.5" HDD
- Smart Array P440ar w/ 2GB FBWC | 4x1Gbe NIC
- 2x 500W PSU | Windows Server 2019 Standard Evaluation
Why AT&T sued
After acquiring VMware, Broadcom shifted the portfolio away from sales of perpetual licenses and standalone support toward subscription-based bundled offerings. AT&T alleged that its earlier agreements gave it the right to renew support for licenses it already held, and that Broadcom was trying to condition continued support on acceptance of the new commercial model.
AT&T’s complaint described an estate of about 75,000 virtual machines across roughly 8,600 hosts or servers. It alleged that the proposed change could raise costs by about 1,050%. Those are AT&T’s claims in litigation, not findings made after a trial. CIO Dive summarized the deployment figures, while Legal Dive reported on the alleged cost increase.
AT&T also said a 2022 amendment extended the relevant enterprise-license period to September 8, 2026. The reach of the renewal language—and how it interacted with other contract terms—was disputed. A stated license period is not, by itself, proof that every related support service must remain available on unchanged terms.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Broadcom’s position and the court’s role
Broadcom disputed AT&T’s interpretation and damages. Public reporting on its arguments said Broadcom maintained that the relevant products or services had been discontinued, that AT&T had not properly renewed or audited the deployments, and that the new commercial model had been communicated. Broadcom also pointed to AT&T’s reported plans to migrate away from VMware. These were defenses and arguments, not a court’s final conclusions. TechTarget’s account of the court proceedings discusses the competing positions.
Rank #3
- This Certified Refurbished product is tested and certified to look and work like new. The refurbishing process includes functionality testing, basic cleaning, inspection, and repackaging. The product ships with all relevant accessories, a minimum 90-day warranty, and may arrive in a generic box. Only select sellers who maintain a high performance bar may offer Certified Refurbished products on Amazon.com
- Dell PowerEdge R710 6B LFF Server
- 2x 2.93GHz X5670 12-Cores Total / 144GB RAM / 6x 2TB 3.5" HDD
- H700 w/ 512MB / DVD-ROM / 2x PSU
- Includes Bezel and Rails / No Operating System
The court granted interim relief requiring support to continue while the dispute was pending. That protection mattered to an operator with a large production environment: losing vendor assistance during a contract fight can create immediate operational risk. The judge reportedly questioned why technical support could not continue if the expertise remained available, while also recognizing disputes about product scope and AT&T’s audit information. Interim relief is not a final ruling that AT&T’s contract interpretation was correct.
The contract issue beneath the pricing dispute
The central question was not simply whether VMware had moved to subscriptions. It was whether the agreements AT&T had already signed required continued support or renewal options despite a later change to the vendor’s product catalog. That question can turn on several distinct rights:
- Perpetual license: a right to use specified software indefinitely, subject to the license terms.
- Support and maintenance: separate services that may provide technical assistance, updates, patches, or other benefits during a defined period.
- Renewal option: a contractual mechanism to extend support or another service, potentially subject to deadlines, pricing rules, or conditions.
- Product availability and end-of-support terms: provisions that may define when a vendor can stop selling or supporting a product or version.
- Order forms and amendments: later documents that may add to, qualify, or conflict with a master agreement.
A perpetual license does not automatically mean perpetual support. Conversely, a supplier’s decision to change its product catalog does not, by itself, answer whether a particular contract’s renewal commitment remains enforceable. AT&T and Broadcom disputed how those provisions fit together, and their settlement left no public merits ruling resolving that question.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What the settlement does—and does not—tell other customers
The agreement ended this litigation, but its substantive terms were not publicly disclosed. Public sources cited here do not verify a settlement payment, discount, support duration, product coverage, migration assistance, admission of liability, or the specific VMware rights AT&T retained. AT&T reportedly said it planned to migrate away from VMware, but the record described here does not establish the timetable, replacement platform, or whether the settlement changed that plan.
Best Value
- Item Package Dimension: 36.0L X 24.0W X 8.0H Inches
- Item Package Weight - 48.0 Pounds
- Item Package Quantity - 1
- Product Type - Computer
Because the case settled before a public merits decision, it did not create binding precedent that Broadcom must honor every customer’s legacy support terms. It may have had commercial signaling value: a large customer challenged a proposed change and obtained interim protection while negotiating. But the outcome of another customer’s dispute will depend on that customer’s own contracts, facts, and procedural choices.
That distinction matters when reading the later New York appellate decision in T-Mobile’s separate VMware support dispute. The court upheld preliminary relief in that case while arbitration proceeded. T-Mobile had different agreements and facts; that decision is not a ruling on AT&T’s contract or a blanket guarantee for VMware customers.
A practical contract review for VMware customers
For a business assessing its exposure, the AT&T case is a reason to review documents and plan contingencies—not to assume the same result. Legal and procurement teams should identify:
- Whether there is a unilateral option to renew, and the deadline and process for exercising it.
- Whether the option covers support only, software licenses, or both.
- How renewal pricing is set: fixed, capped, formula-based, or subject to a new quote.
- Whether the master agreement, enterprise order, amendment, or product-specific terms control if provisions conflict.
- What end-of-availability and end-of-support clauses say, and whether they qualify a renewal right.
- Whether support attaches to a named version, SKU, or broader product family.
- Any deployment-reporting or audit duties that could affect eligibility or pricing.
- Successor, assignment, governing-law, arbitration, and interim-relief provisions.
- The operational consequences of a support lapse, including security patches, incident response, backup, and disaster recovery.
Keep contractual options and technical continuity plans aligned. Litigation may preserve service temporarily and strengthen negotiating leverage, but it is costly and company-specific. A negotiated extension may buy transition time but could involve higher near-term costs. Moving to a subscription can preserve access to current offerings while changing procurement and cost predictability. Migrating away may reduce exposure to future renewal changes, but it brings application compatibility, staffing, tooling, testing, and downtime risks.
Any migration decision should begin with workload and dependency discovery, not a product slogan. An organization’s fit with another platform depends on its hardware, storage, networking, disaster-recovery design, operating systems, compliance obligations, skills, and appetite for operational change. AT&T’s reported migration intention is not evidence that one alternative is right for every VMware estate.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
