Some links on this page are affiliate links: if you buy through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you.
Intel has hired a former Samsung Foundry executive, but there is no publicly verified evidence of a formal collaboration between Intel Foundry and Samsung Foundry. No joint venture, manufacturing agreement, memorandum of understanding, technology-sharing deal, or confirmed capacity arrangement has been announced in the available evidence.
The report appears to combine Intel’s recruitment of Shawn Seung Hoon Han, its push to attract Korean foundry customers, and speculation about possible cooperation in packaging or supply-chain capacity. Those developments are strategically relevant—but they are not the same as a company-to-company partnership.
What Intel and Samsung have actually confirmed
Intel Foundry announced in April 2026 that it had appointed Shawn Seung Hoon Han as senior vice president and general manager of Foundry Services. Han spent roughly three decades at Samsung and most recently had responsibility for Samsung Foundry sales. Intel said the appointment was intended to support expanded customer engagements. Intel’s announcement did not describe Samsung Foundry as an Intel partner.
Intel subsequently appointed Seok-Hee Lee on June 18, 2026, to lead advanced packaging, system integration, back-end technology development, and back-end manufacturing, according to Reuters reporting published by Investing.com. The sequence shows Intel recruiting senior Korean semiconductor expertise across both foundry sales and packaging. It does not establish that Samsung Electronics or Samsung Foundry agreed to cooperate with Intel.
#1 Best Overall
Why the headline may be misleading
“Interested in collaborating” is an ambiguous phrase. It might refer to informal executive discussions, a customer using both companies, compatible packaging standards, possible capacity cooperation, or a formal commercial agreement. These scenarios have very different implications.
Based on the available evidence, the strongest supported description is: Intel hired a former Samsung Foundry sales leader while trying to expand its external-foundry business and reach more Korean customers.
Intel also held its Direct Connect Asia event in Seoul, where it promoted its foundry business in a market closely associated with Samsung. Tom’s Hardware reported that Intel was seeking customers in Samsung’s home market. Targeting Samsung’s customers is competitive activity, not evidence of cooperation with Samsung itself.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What Han’s appointment means for Intel
Intel’s external-foundry strategy is still developing. Unlike Samsung, TSMC, GlobalFoundries, and UMC, Intel historically built much of its business around manufacturing its own processors. Intel acknowledges in its annual filing that it has limited experience in the highly competitive third-party foundry market.
A senior executive with Samsung Foundry sales experience could help Intel in several practical areas:
- Building relationships with Korean chip designers, system companies, and semiconductor suppliers.
- Explaining Intel’s process and packaging roadmap to prospective customers.
- Managing design-win qualification and commercial negotiations.
- Addressing customer concerns about yield, capacity, delivery schedules, pricing, and confidentiality.
- Understanding how customers compare process technologies and decide whether to move production.
These are reasonable strategic inferences from Han’s background and Intel’s stated objective. They do not justify claims that Han transferred Samsung customers, confidential information, or business to Intel.
Rank #2
How Intel Foundry and Samsung Foundry compete
Intel’s own filing lists Samsung among its direct competitors in advanced manufacturing. Foundries compete on process availability, time to market, performance, power efficiency, transistor density, capacity, price, margins, quality, yield, advanced packaging, ecosystem support, and customer service.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Intel Foundry offers wafer fabrication, advanced packaging, chiplets, software, and related services. Its disclosed process portfolio includes Intel 18A, Intel 3, Intel 7, Intel 16, a planned 12-nanometer process developed with UMC, and future Intel 14A development.
The business is also financially challenging. Intel reported 2024 Intel Foundry revenue of $17.543 billion, a gross loss of $8.053 billion, and an operating loss of $13.408 billion. Those segment figures include the foundry operation as reported by Intel and should not be interpreted as external-customer revenue alone.
Intel’s filing also highlights concerns that potential customers may have about intellectual-property protection, confidentiality, and conflicts with Intel’s own product businesses. Those issues would make any direct Intel–Samsung arrangement especially sensitive because both companies compete for many of the same customers and advanced-node programs.
What forms of cooperation are theoretically possible?
Several arrangements could make strategic sense, particularly as AI systems require advanced logic, high-bandwidth memory, chiplets, and sophisticated packaging. However, none of the following has been confirmed between Intel Foundry and Samsung Foundry.
| Possible model | What the available evidence shows | What would prove it |
|---|---|---|
| Intel hires Samsung personnel | Confirmed in Han’s case | Intel’s public appointment announcement |
| Intel targets Samsung-linked customers | Plausible and reported after Intel’s Seoul event | A named customer or Intel confirmation of a deal |
| Intel and Samsung jointly package AI chips | Unconfirmed | A joint announcement or customer disclosure naming a specific program |
| Samsung uses Intel wafer capacity | Unconfirmed | A contract, filing, or production disclosure |
| Intel uses Samsung Foundry for selected products | Unconfirmed | A product, customer, or supply-chain announcement |
| Intel and Samsung form a joint venture | No evidence located | A formal corporate announcement or regulatory filing |
Why advanced packaging is part of the speculation
Advanced packaging can combine separately manufactured dies, memory, and interconnect technologies into one high-performance system. That makes it possible to imagine arrangements in which one company manufactures logic, another supplies memory-related components, and a third performs packaging or integration.
Rank #3
In theory, Intel’s packaging and system-integration capabilities could complement Samsung’s logic, memory, packaging, and Korean supply-chain relationships. Hypothetical examples include Intel packaging a system containing Samsung-made components, Samsung fabricating one portion of a multi-die design while Intel makes another, or a customer qualifying both companies for geographically diversified production.
But a customer using Intel and Samsung independently would not necessarily mean Intel Foundry and Samsung Foundry had a direct agreement. Multi-foundry manufacturing requires compatible design rules, libraries, process-development kits, electrical specifications, testing procedures, logistics, security controls, and yield management. Qualification can be expensive and slow.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Potential benefits and obstacles
For Intel
A relationship involving Samsung’s broader ecosystem could provide access to Korean customers, additional packaging opportunities, and potentially more utilization for Intel facilities. Han’s recruitment may also improve Intel’s credibility with customers familiar with Samsung’s foundry business.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
The obstacles are substantial. Samsung remains a competitor, and a hire alone does not prove that Intel can deliver competitive yields, pricing, process maturity, or schedules. Sharing sensitive roadmaps or customer information could also weaken Intel’s competitive position.
For Samsung
Samsung could theoretically gain access to Intel’s U.S. manufacturing or packaging footprint and offer customers another route to geographic diversification. A carefully separated arrangement might also create complementary capacity for complex AI systems.
At the same time, helping Intel would strengthen a rival. Samsung would need safeguards around intellectual property, customer segregation, process information, and commercial data. It may instead prefer to improve utilization and execution through its own fabs and ecosystem.
For chip customers
Using both foundries could provide supply alternatives and negotiating leverage. It might also allow a customer to combine different process, memory, and packaging strengths.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →The trade-off is complexity. Designs are not automatically portable between Intel and Samsung processes. Different process design kits, libraries, electrical rules, packaging flows, yield profiles, delivery schedules, and testing requirements can erase the theoretical benefits of a multi-vendor strategy.
Intel already has a disclosed foundry collaboration—but it is with UMC
One source of confusion may be Intel’s existing, publicly disclosed collaboration with United Microelectronics Corporation. Intel’s filing describes a planned 12-nanometer process developed with UMC. That is a useful comparison: a real collaboration has a named counterparty and a disclosed technical scope. The filing does not identify Samsung Foundry as a comparable partner.
What remains unknown
The available material does not establish:
- Whether Intel and Samsung executives held formal partnership discussions.
- Whether a customer is involved in any proposed arrangement.
- Whether the subject is wafer fabrication, packaging, memory, intellectual property, capacity, or investment.
- Whether Samsung has confirmed or denied discussions.
- Whether any agreement has been signed.
- Whether any product has entered qualification, pilot production, or mass production.
It is also important to distinguish stages of commercial activity. “Interest,” “talks,” “evaluation,” “qualification,” “design win,” “prepayment,” and “mass production” are not interchangeable. Customer interest does not equal booked production volume.
What would confirm a real Intel–Samsung collaboration?
The claim should be upgraded from speculation only after stronger evidence appears, such as:
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute- A joint Intel–Samsung press release.
- A Samsung Electronics or Samsung Foundry regulatory filing.
- An Intel filing naming Samsung as a wafer, packaging, capacity, or technology partner.
- A signed memorandum or commercial agreement with a stated scope.
- A customer announcement naming both companies in one manufacturing flow.
- A joint event presentation identifying the program, process node, packaging technology, geography, customer, investment, or production volume.
Another anonymous report, a shared industry theme such as HBM or chiplets, or another executive hire would not by itself meet that standard.
Bottom line
Intel is clearly strengthening its foundry organization and recruiting senior Samsung-linked expertise. It is also pursuing customers in South Korea and emphasizing advanced packaging. Those moves could eventually support cooperation involving a customer, packaging flow, or regional capacity.
For now, however, the evidence supports a story about competition, recruiting, and possible ecosystem overlap—not a verified Intel Foundry–Samsung Foundry partnership.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
